Facilitating the process of designing and developing a project

• US 20050114829A1
• Filed: 09/30/2004
• Published: 05/26/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 10/30/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Getchell, Scott D., Dyas, Holly, Kroes, Roelof, Kazmi, Pervez, Paschino, Enzo, Haynes, Paul D., Robin, Allison, Oikawa, Robert Y.
• Application Number:
  US10/955,248
• Publication Number:
  US 20050114829A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/101
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

The process of designing and developing a software project is facilitated with one or more of multiple exemplary data structures. These exemplary data structures facilitate interaction among team members from one or more teams selected from those of an exemplary team model and across process phases of two or more process phases selected from those of an exemplary process model. Moreover, the exemplary data structures facilitate implementation of and adherence to (i) an exemplary risk management discipline and process and (ii) an exemplary readiness management discipline and process. These exemplary data structures include, but are not limited to, a milestone review data structure, a team lead project progress data structures, a vision/scope data structure, a project structure data structure, a team member project progress data structure, a master project plan data structure, a training plan data structure, a functional specification data structure, and a post project analysis data structure.

Claims

1. One or more processor-accessible media having processor-executable instructions that comprise a data structure, the data structure comprising:

at least two fields identifying needs and processes for training people who are to participate in creating a software solution;

wherein the at least two fields correspond respectively to at least two teams formed from the people who are to participate in creating the software solution.

2. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least two fields comprise a first field corresponding to a product management team and a second field corresponding to a test team.

3. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least two fields comprise a first field corresponding to a program management team and a second field corresponding to a user experience team.

4. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least two fields comprise a first field corresponding to a development team and a second field corresponding to a release management team.

5. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the at least two fields correspond to at least two teams selected from the group of teams comprising:

product management, program management, development, test, user experience, and release management.

6. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 5, wherein a field of the at least two fields includes two or more of:

a description of project responsibilities, an indication of knowledge and skill requirements, an explanation of proficiency levels by knowledge and skill area, or a listing of training requirements.

7. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the data structure comprises a training plan data structure;

and wherein the data structure further comprises;

a summary field that provides an overall summary of the contents of the training plan data structure; and

an objectives field that describes the training activities'"'"' key objectives in terms of creating sufficient competency in both technical and project management knowledge and skill areas.

8. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the data structure further comprises:

a training requirements field that defines what a planned-for training process is to deliver by identifying teams that are to have training, by defining their specific knowledge and skill requirements, by establishing proficiency levels for that knowledge and skill, and by identifying training to attain the proficiency targets.

9. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, wherein the data structure further comprises:

(i) an information technology (IT) administration field that relates to position and responsibilities of a customer'"'"'s IT administration staff and (ii) a helpdesk and support (HS) staff field that relates to position and responsibilities of the customer'"'"'s HS staff;

wherein the IT administration field and the HS staff field each include at least one of;

a description of project responsibilities, an indication of knowledge and skill requirements, an explanation of proficiency levels by knowledge and skill area, or a listing of training requirements.

10. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a milestone review data structure that is adapted to summarize observations and findings of a project'"'"'s milestone review;

wherein the milestone review data structure comprises;

a status of milestone deliverables field that lists deliverables that are to be completed at a milestone review and identifies their status; and

a readiness-for-next-milestone field that describes how well the project is positioned to achieve a next milestone.

11. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a team lead project progress data structure that is adapted to summarize a team'"'"'s progress on a project, including variance and impact on project delivery;

wherein the team lead project progress data structure comprises;

an issues and opportunities field that lists issues that affect the project and highlights project-related opportunities; and

a team project schedule update field that provides a report of changes to schedule status.

12. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a vision/scope data structure that is adapted to represent ideas and decisions developed during an envisioning phase of a project for the software solution; and

wherein the vision/scope data structure describes an agreement between an overall team of the project and a customer of the software solution on a desired solution and overall project direction.

13. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 12, wherein the vision/scope data structure comprises:

a business opportunity field that describes the customer'"'"'s situation and needs;

a solutions concept field that describes an approach the overall team of the project is to take to meet the customer'"'"'s needs;

a scope field that describes a boundary of the solution as defined through a range of features and functions and a customer acceptance criteria;

a solution design strategies field that describes architectural and technical designs to be used to create the software solution.

14. The one or more processor-acessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a project structure data structure that is adapted to define an approach the at least two teams are to take in organizing and managing a project for the software solution, the project data structure comprising a strategic representation of decisions regarding one or more of goals, work scope, team requirements, team processes, or risk.

15. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 14, wherein the project structure data structure comprises:

a knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) field that specifies requirements for project participants, the requirements organized into functional teams and responsibilities; and

a risk and issue assessment field that identifies and quantifies risks and issues that become apparent during an envisioning phase.

16. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 15, wherein the risk and issue assessment field comprises at least one of:

risk identification statements that lists project risks and conditions and consequences of each of the listed risks;

a risk analysis that describes an objective assessment of any risk'"'"'s significance, including a calculation of risk exposure by assessing probability and impact for each item on the list of project risks;

risk plans that describe actions that can prevent and/or minimize risks and provide a course of action if a risk does occur;

or risk priorities that enumerates the top “

x”

risks that threaten the project.

17. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a team member project progress data structure that is adapted to summarize periodic accomplishments and to highlight concerns and issues that may affect a project for creating the software solution;

wherein the team member project progress data structure comprises;

an open action items field that summarizes “

open”

action items scheduled for completion within a given reporting period; and

an issues and opportunities field that lists issues that affect the project and highlights project-related opportunities.

18. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a master project plan data structure that is adapted to present a single synchronized plan covering multiple which subsidiary plans;

wherein the master project plan data structure comprises;

a master project plan summary field that provides an overview of the master project plan data structure, the overview including a general description of subsidiary plans contained therein.

19. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 18, wherein the master project plan data structure includes qualitative information relating to at least one subsidiary plan selected from the group comprising:

a development plan, a test plan, a support plan, and a training plan.

20. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 19, wherein the development plan includes information regarding development objectives, overall delivery strategy, and key design goals;

the test plan includes information regarding testing objectives, overall test approach, expected test results, and test deliverables; and

the training plan includes information regarding training objectives, training requirements, training schedule, and training methods.

21. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a functional specification data structure that is adapted to include technical drill-down information explaining what the at least two teams are building and deploying;

wherein the functional specification data structure comprises;

a functional specification executive summary field that provides a strategic statement of the functional specification data structure, at least partially, by identifying which foundational data structures comprise the functional specification data structure and by providing a brief statement regarding each such foundational data structure.

22. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 21, wherein the functional specification data structure further comprises eight summary fields, each summary field of the eight summary fields directed to one of usage scenarios, user requirements, business requirements, operations requirements, system requirements, conceptual design, logical design, or physical design.

23. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

a post project analysis data structure that is adapted to record results from conducting a depth and breadth assessment of a project for creating the software solution from its inception to its completion.

24. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 23, wherein the assessment of the post project analysis data structure captures successes, challenges, and failures as well as identifying what should have been done differently on the project and what could be done differently in future projects.

25. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 23, wherein the post project analysis data structure comprises:

a summary field that provides a brief summary of the post project analysis data structure, including what will be done with contents thereof, with the contents including lessons learned; and

an objectives field that defines objectives of the post project analysis data structure, the objectives including at least one of (i) recording results of a comprehensive project analysis or (ii) ensuring that the lessons learned during the project are documented and shared.

26. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 23, wherein the post project analysis data structure comprises at least two fields selected from a group of nine fields comprising a planning field, a resources field, a project management/scheduling field, a development/design/specifications field, a testing field, a communications field, a team/organization filed, a solution field, and a tools field;

and wherein each field of the at least two fields includes at least one of an accomplishments subfield, a challenges subfield, or a lessons learned subfield.

27. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 23, wherein the one or more processor-accessible media comprise at least one of (i) one or more storage media or (ii) on or more transmission media.

28. A device comprising:

at least one processor; and

one or more media including processor-executable instructions that are capable of being executed by the at least one processor, the processor-executable instructions adapted to direct the device to perform actions comprising

accessing a training plan data structure;

enabling a user of the device to modify the training plan data structure; and

storing the training plan data structure after modification;

wherein the training plan data structure includes information related to risk management and readiness management for a software project.

29. The device as recited in claim 28, wherein at least one field of the training plan data structure that may be modified by the user of the device relate to one or more of a product management team, a program management team, a development team, a test team, a user experience team, and a release management team.

30. The device as recited in claim 28, wherein at least one field of the training plan data structure that may be modified by the user of the device includes information related to training to ensure an adequate level of knowledge, skills, and abilities by participants of the software project.

31. The device as recited in claim 28, wherein the one or more media includes or otherwise provides access to a knowledge, skills, and abilities database.

32. The device as recited in claim 28, wherein the processor-executable instructions are adapted to direct the device to perform further actions comprising:

accessing a prioritized risk list;

accessing at least part of risk knowledge base; and

enabling the user of the device to update the prioritized risk list responsive to the risk knowledge base.

33. A method comprising:

establishing a multiple stage process model comprising at least a stabilizing stage that is at least partially conducted subsequent to at least a portion of a developing stage; and

storing data associated with said multiple stage process model.

34. The method as recited in claim 33, wherein said multiple stage process model includes at least one further stage selected from a group of stages comprising an envisioning stage, a planning stage, and a deploying stage.

35. The method as recited in claim 33, wherein said stabilizing stage includes at least one milestone selected from a group of milestones comprising a bug convergence milestone, a zero bug bounce milestone, a user acceptance testing milestone, a release candidates milestone, a pre-production testing complete milestone, and a pilot complete milestone.

36. The method as recited in claim 33, wherein at least a portion of said stabilizing stage occurs prior to a deploying stage.

37. One or more processor-accessible media having processor-executable instructions that comprise a data structure, the data structure comprising:

a first field that defines knowledge, skills, and/or abilities to be utilized to conduct a software project, the first field organized into functional teams and responsibilities; and

a second field that describes processes, methods, and/or tools to be used to manage risks associated with the software project.

38. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 37, wherein:

the knowledge, skills, and/or abilities of the first field include technical, managerial, and/or support capabilities; and

the second field includes one or more of;

a description of risk management processes, methods, and/or tools;

a schedule/frequency of risk management activities;

roles and responsibilities within the risk management process; and

specifications of a risk assessment form.

39. The one or more processor-accessible media as recited in claim 37, wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by a device, are adapted to direct the device to perform an action comprising at least one of:

transmitting the data structure from the device;

or

receiving the data structure at the device.