System and method for determining costs within an enterprise

• US 20050120010A1
• Filed: 11/19/2004
• Published: 06/02/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 11/20/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: aPriori Technologies, Inc.
• Original Assignee: aPriori Technologies, Inc.
• Inventors: Hiller, Eric A., Schrader, R. Sebastian, Azzolino, Frank V., Carroll, Andrew J., Rishel, Jeremy D., Philpott, Michael L.
• Application Number:
  US10/993,405
• Publication Number:
  US 20050120010A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, there is disclosed a method for determining costs within an enterprise. The method comprises determining a set of cost-drivers based on characteristics of three-dimensional design data of a manufacturable component; and providing, to a plurality of different enterprise functions, database access to cost data from any combination of: the set of cost-drivers, and a set of costs determined based on the set of cost-drivers. In another embodiment, there is disclosed a computer system for determining costs within an enterprise. The system comprises a database comprising a set of stored cost-drivers determined based on characteristics of three-dimensional design data of a manufacturable component; and a network capable of providing, to a plurality of different enterprise functions, access to cost data from any combination of: the set of cost drivers, and a set of costs determined based on the set of cost-drivers.

Claims

1. A method for determining costs within an enterprise, the method comprising:

determining a set of cost-drivers based on characteristics of three-dimensional design data of a manufacturable component; and

providing, to a plurality of different enterprise functions, database access to cost data from any combination of;

the set of cost-drivers, and a set of costs determined based on the set of cost-drivers.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein providing the database access is performed during product development of a newly designed manufacturable component.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of different enterprise functions comprises a design function, a manufacturing function, a purchasing function, and a business management function.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein providing the database access comprises providing a plurality of different cost-levels.

5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the plurality of cost-levels comprises a cost-level selected from a design cost, a manufacturing cost, and a purchasing cost.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the manufacturing cost comprises a cost determined based on costs of routing production of the manufacturable component to a specific manufacturing station.

7. A method according to claim 5, wherein the purchasing cost comprises a cost selected from purchasing costs for a plurality of different manufacturing plants.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the cost-drivers are stored in a database in association with three-dimensional computer-aided design data for the manufacturable component.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the cost-drivers are stored in a database independent of three-dimensional computer-aided design data for the manufacturable component.

10. A method according to claim 1, wherein providing the database access is used to perform a should-cost analysis for a design project comprising a plurality of manufacturable components.

11. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

initiating a cost estimation cycle with each design change in the three-dimensional design data of the manufacturable component.

12. A method according to claim 1, wherein determining the set of cost drivers comprises using a geometric feature extraction algorithm.

13. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

determining a set of acceptable manufacturing process routings for the manufacturable component;

determining a lowest cost routing, of the set of acceptable routings; and

displaying the lowest cost routing to a user on a graphical user interface.

14. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

using a first server to store the cost data; and

using a second server to store a set of cost models from which the cost drivers are determined.

15. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

providing different levels of security access to the cost data, to different enterprise functions, the levels of security access comprising modify access and read-only access.

16. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

providing an interpreter to allow a user to link cost drivers to custom cost models, used to determine the costs based on the cost drivers.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein the interpreter uses a scripting language to link the cost drivers to the custom cost models.

18. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

providing a comparison of tooling investments for producing the manufacturable component based on the cost data.

19. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

graphically superimposing a representation of the set of cost-drivers onto the three-dimensional design data.

20. A method according to claim 1, further comprising:

providing a manufacturing cost for an assembly of a plurality of manufacturable components, wherein the manufacturing cost for each manufacturable component of the assembly is determined using cost-drivers based on three-dimensional design data of each such manufacturable component.

21. A method according to claim 1, wherein providing the database access comprises providing cost data, to at least some of the plurality of different enterprise functions, that is based on manufacturing attributes specified without direct reference to a geometric model of the manufacturable component.

22. A computer system for determining costs within an enterprise, the system comprising:

a database comprising a set of stored cost-drivers determined based on characteristics of three-dimensional design data of a manufacturable component; and

a network capable of providing, to a plurality of different enterprise functions, access to cost data from any combination of;

the set of cost drivers, and a set of costs determined based on the set of cost-drivers.

23. A computer system according to claim 22, the system comprising:

a design interface, for providing the database access to a design function;

a manufacturing interface, for providing the database access to a manufacturing function;

a purchasing interface, for providing the database access to a purchasing function; and

a management interface, for providing the database access to a business management function.

24. A computer system according to claim 22, the system comprising:

a customization interface, for allowing a user to determine cost data based on costs of routing production of the manufacturable component to one of a plurality of different manufacturing plants.

25. A computer system according to claim 23, wherein the manufacturing interface allows a user to determine a cost based on costs of routing production of the manufacturable component to a specific manufacturing station.

26. A computer system according to claim 23, wherein the purchasing interface is capable of providing a should-cost analysis for a design project comprising a plurality of manufacturable components.

27. A computer system according to claim 22, wherein the database comprises three-dimensional computer-aided design data for the manufacturable component, stored in association with the cost drivers.

28. A computer system according to claim 22, wherein the database comprises three-dimensional computer-aided design data for the manufacturable component, stored independent from the cost drivers.

29. A computer system according to claim 22, the system comprising a process optimizer capable of initiating a cost estimation cycle with each design change in the three-dimensional design data of the manufacturable component.

30. A computer system according to claim 29, wherein the process optimizer is capable of determining the set of cost drivers using a geometric feature extraction algorithm.

31. A computer system according to claim 27, wherein the process optimizer is capable of:

determining a set of acceptable manufacturing process routings for the manufacturable component;

determining a lowest cost routing, of the set of acceptable routings; and

providing the lowest cost routing to a graphical user interface for display to a user.

32. A computer system according to claim 22, the system comprising:

a first server for storing the cost data; and

a second server for storing a set of cost models from which the cost drivers are determined.

33. A computer system according to claim 22, the system comprising an interpreter capable of allowing a user to link cost drivers to custom cost models, used to determine the costs based on the cost drivers.

34. A system according to claim 22, further comprising:

an assembly module for providing a manufacturing cost for an assembly of a plurality of manufacturable components, wherein the manufacturing cost for each manufacturable component of the assembly is determined using cost-drivers based on three-dimensional design data of each such manufacturable component.

35. A system according to claim 22, wherein the network is capable of providing access to the cost data, to at least some of the plurality of different enterprise functions, based on manufacturing attributes specified without direct reference to a geometric model of the manufacturable component.