Method and system for energy management via energy-aware process scheduling

• US 20050125701A1
• Filed: 12/03/2003
• Published: 06/09/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 12/03/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Rajamony, Ramakrishan, Rawson, Freeman Leigh III, Hensbergen, Eric Van
• Application Number:
  US10/727,318
• Publication Number:
  US 20050125701A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 713/320
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 1/3203 Power management, i.e. event-based initiation of a power-saving mode
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 1/329 by task scheduling
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2209/483 Multiproc
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/4893 taking into account power or heat criteria power management in computers in general G06F1/3203; thermal management in computers in general G06F1/206
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 10/00 Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management

Abstract

A method and system for energy management via energy-aware process scheduling provides per-process energy use/power dissipation control to manage system energy requirements and thermal conditions without throttling overall system performance. Use of energy by a particular process is measured or is estimated from resource requirements that are determined by the operating system or reported by the application owning the process. The scheduler then determines whether or not to allocate execution slices to the process in conformity with the measured or estimated energy requirements of the process. The scheduler may insert “idle” execution slices to reduce energy use/power dissipation or may prefer low energy-use processes over high energy-use processes. Pragmatic faults may be issued as warnings from the operating system to an application to indicate that energy requirements need to be curtailed. If the warning sent to the application does not result in sufficient energy use/power dissipation reduction, then the scheduler may implement the selective allocation of slices to processes that have an excessive energy requirement. The scheduler may be notified of such a condition through pragmatic “critical” faults that indicate a higher degree of severity than the previously-issued warning faults.

Claims

1. A method of managing energy in a processing system, comprising:

receiving an indication of a need to reduce a energy usage level in said processing system at a scheduler;

determining whether or not a next process to be scheduled has an associated level of energy usage greater than a threshold; and

selectively scheduling an execution slice for said next process in response to determining that said associated level of energy usage does not exceed said threshold.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

reading values of a plurality of performance counters during one or more previous execution slices of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said values of said plurality of performance counters.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

measuring actual energy usage of said processing system during or more previous execution slices of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said measured energy usage.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

second determining a resource usage of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said resource usage.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising receiving from an application owning said next process an indication of said resource usage, and wherein said second determining determines said resource usage in conformity with said received indication.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein said second determining is performed by said operating system by observing prior allocation of resources to said next process.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

issuing a pragmatic warning fault indicating that a system energy usage above a system energy threshold; and

second receiving said pragmatic warning fault at an application associated with said next process, and in response to said second receiving, reducing a resource usage within said application, whereby a energy usage of said next process is reduced.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

issuing a critical pragmatic fault indicating that said system energy usage has not been reduced below said system energy threshold; and

receiving said critical pragmatic fault at said scheduler, and wherein said selectively scheduling is performed in response to said receipt of said critical pragmatic fault by said scheduler.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said selectively scheduling inserts idle slices into an execution queue, whereby said energy usage level is reduced.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said selectively scheduling schedules a second process having a lower level of energy usage than said next process in preference over said next process.

11. A processing system, comprising:

a processor;

a memory coupled to said processor for storing program instructions and data values, and wherein said program instructions comprise an operating system scheduler that includes program instructions for

receiving an indication of a need to reduce a energy usage level in said processing system at a scheduler,

determining whether or not a next process to be scheduled has an associated level of energy usage greater than a threshold, and

selectively scheduling an execution slice for said next process in response to determining that said associated level of energy usage does not exceed said threshold.

12. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

reading values of a plurality of performance counters during one or more previous execution slices of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said values of said plurality of performance counters.

13. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

measuring actual energy usage of said processing system during or more previous execution slices of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said measured energy usage.

14. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

second determining a resource usage of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said resource usage.

15. The processing system of claim 14, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for receiving from an application owning said next process an indication of said resource usage, and wherein said determining determines said resource usage in conformity with said received indication.

16. The processing system of claim 14, wherein said program instructions for second determining further comprise program instructions for observing prior allocation of resources to said next process.

17. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

issuing a pragmatic warning fault indicating that a system energy usage above a system energy threshold; and

receiving said pragmatic warning fault at an application associated with said next process, and in response to said receiving, reducing a resource usage within said application, whereby a energy usage of said next process is reduced.

18. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

issuing a critical pragmatic fault indicating that said system energy usage has not been reduced below said system energy threshold; and

receiving said critical pragmatic fault at said scheduler, and wherein said selectively scheduling is performed in response to said receipt of said critical pragmatic fault by said scheduler.

19. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions for selectively scheduling insert idle slices into an execution queue, whereby said energy usage level is reduced.

20. The processing system of claim 11, wherein said program instructions for selectively scheduling schedule a second process having a lower level of energy usage than said next process in preference over said next process.

21. A computer program product comprising signal-bearing media encoding program instructions and data, wherein said program instructions comprise an operating system scheduler that includes program instructions for

receiving an indication of a need to reduce a energy usage level in said processing system at a scheduler,

determining whether or not a next process to be scheduled has an associated level of energy usage greater than a threshold, and

selectively scheduling an execution slice for said next process in response to determining that said associated level of energy usage does not exceed said threshold.

22. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said is program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

reading values of a plurality of performance counters during one or more previous execution slices of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said values of said plurality of performance counters.

23. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

measuring actual energy usage of said processing system during or more previous execution slices of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said measured energy usage.

24. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

second determining a resource usage of said next process; and

estimating said associated level of energy usage in conformity with said resource usage.

25. The computer program product of claim 24, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for receiving from an application owning said next process an indication of said resource usage, and wherein said determining determines said resource usage in conformity with said received indication.

26. The computer program product of claim 24, wherein said program instructions for second determining further comprise program instructions for observing prior allocation of resources to said next process.

27. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

issuing a pragmatic warning fault indicating that a system energy usage above a system energy threshold; and

receiving said pragmatic warning fault at an application associated with said next process, and in response to said receiving, reducing a resource usage within said application, whereby a energy usage of said next process is reduced.

28. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said program instructions further comprise program instructions for:

issuing a critical pragmatic fault indicating that said system energy usage has not been reduced below said system energy threshold; and

receiving said critical pragmatic fault at said scheduler, and wherein said selectively scheduling is performed in response to said receipt of said critical pragmatic fault by said scheduler.

29. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said program instructions for selectively scheduling insert idle slices into an execution queue, whereby said energy usage level is reduced.

30. The computer program product of claim 21, wherein said program instructions for selectively scheduling schedule a second process having a lower level of energy usage than said next process in preference over said next process.