Multibeam phased array antenna

• US 20050134505A1
• Filed: 12/18/2003
• Published: 06/23/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Original Assignee: The Boeing Co.
• Inventors: McCleary, James C., Turpin, Raenaurd D., Werntz, Paul C., Kalian, David
• Granted Patent: US 6,946,992 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 342/368
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 25/007 using two or more primary active elements in the focal region of a focusing device for operation on different wavebands H01Q5/22

Abstract

Systems and methods provide intermodulation reduction techniques for multiple beam phased array antennas. For example, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an optimization approach is employed to determine array element excitations that reduce IM interference.

Claims

1. A method of determining array element excitations for input data signals of an array antenna, the method comprising:

evaluating initial array element excitations to determine intermodulation interference generated when the input data signals are transmitted as corresponding antenna beams;

determining expected performance of the antenna beams corresponding to the input data signals relative to the intermodulation interference; and

modifying the initial array element excitations to generate modified array element excitations to improve the expected performance of the antenna beams relative to the intermodulation interference.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing the modified array element excitations as array element excitations for the input data signals to be transmitted by the array antenna.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the evaluating of the initial array element excitations comprises:

determining intermodulation beam signals;

determining intermodulation beam-performance corresponding to the intermodulation beam signals; and

calculating the intermodulation interference expected for each of the antenna beams corresponding to the input data signals.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining expected performance of the antenna beams comprises calculating directivity, mainbeam gain, and/or EIRP at a number of coverage points.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the determining further comprises calculating sidelobe beam gain, directivity, and/or EIRP at a number of coverage points.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the determining operation further comprises a comparison of the expected performance for isolation, directivity, and/or EIRP to specifications.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying operation comprises modifying the initial array element excitations to perform phase optimization of the input data signals to suppress the intermodulation interference.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the evaluating operation further comprises determining if any sidelobe interference is generated, the determining operation further comprises comparing the expected performance of the antenna beams relative to any sidelobe interference, and the modifying operation further comprises modifying the initial array element excitations to improve the expected performance of the antenna beams relative to any sidelobe interference.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying operation comprises a conjugate gradient optimizer algorithm, a sequential quadratic optimizer algorithm, or a genetic algorithm.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising maintaining nominal operating points of amplifiers of the array antenna.

11. An antenna system comprising:

beam forming modules adapted to receive input signals and control signals;

amplifiers associated with the beam forming modules;

array elements coupled to corresponding ones of the amplifiers;

memory storing instructions; and

a processor adapted to execute the instructions to calculate expected intermodulation interference and modify the control signals to reduce the intermodulation interference.

12. The antenna system of claim 11, wherein the beam forming modules provide amplitude and/or phase adjustments to the input signals based on the control signals.

13. The antenna system of claim 11, wherein the amplifiers are common amplifiers adapted to amplify more than one of the input signals.

14. The antenna system of claim 11, wherein the instructions further comprise the following operations to be performed by the processor:

calculating intermodulation array element excitations;

evaluating directivities and/or EIRP of intermodulation beams;

summing the intermodulation interference corresponding to each of the input signals; and

calculating an isolation value of directivities and/or EIRP associated with the input signals relative to directivities and/or EIRP of the intermodulation beams.

15. The antenna system of claim 14, wherein the instructions further comprise the following operations to be performed by the processor:

comparing the isolation value to a desired value;

comparing the directivities and/or EIRP associated with the input signals to desired directivity and/or EIRP values; and

modifying the control signals to optimize the isolation value and/or the directivities and/or the EIRP values associated with the input signals.

16. The antenna system of claim 15, wherein the instructions further comprise the following operations to be performed by the processor:

calculating sidelobe interference due to the input signals; and

factoring the sidelobe interference into the isolation value calculated.

17. The antenna system of claim 11, wherein the antenna system is incorporated as part of a spacecraft.

18. A method of optimizing array element excitations for input signals to an array antenna, the method comprising:

calculating one or more antenna beam parameters corresponding to the input signals;

calculating one or more antenna beam parameters corresponding to intermodulation interference;

calculating a difference between the antenna beam parameters corresponding to the input signals relative to the antenna beam parameters corresponding to the intermodulation interference; and

modifying the array element excitations to reduce the intermodulation interference.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the calculating operation for the one or more antenna beam parameters corresponding to the input signals is performed for selected coverage points.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the calculating operation for the one or more antenna beam parameters corresponding to the intermodulation interference further comprises calculating intermodulation array element excitations.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein the modifying operation substantially maintains directivities and/or EIRP corresponding to the input signals to desired values while reducing the intermodulation interference.

22. The method of claim 18, wherein one of the antenna beam parameters comprises edge of beam coverage for antenna beams corresponding to the input signals.

23. The method of claim 22, further comprising comparing the edge of beam coverage to desired first values and comparing the difference calculated to desired second values.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the comparing operations for the edge of beam coverage and the difference are assigned weighted priorities relative to each other and to each of the associated input signals.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein the modifying operation further comprises maintaining amplifier levels at desired nominal operating points.