Method for accurate estimation of noise for data modems

• US 20050135466A1
• Filed: 12/18/2003
• Published: 06/23/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2003
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: LSI Corporation (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Inventors: Goel, Nagendra K.
• Granted Patent: US 7,362,801 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 375/227
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/3171 BER [Bit Error Rate] test

Abstract

Noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation are relatively straightforward tasks. However, when SNR is small, systematic errors in measurement may result in over-estimation of SNR, which also occurs during runtime monitoring of SNR. Here, sufficient numbers of bits have been preassigned to each channel using QAM modulation scheme. Therefore, SNR relative to QAM lattice size depends on the noise margin and the desired (bit error rate) BER. If a relatively small margin is desired, similar measurement errors may result in over-estimation of SNR. Another problem that arises is that the variance of the noise estimator is relatively high. Therefore, SNR estimates may vary by several dB, and there is only 50% confidence in the usual estimators that the actual SNR value will not be worse than that estimated. Thus, a computationally efficient method for SNR estimation that also allows for specification of a confidence level in the estimates is provided.

Claims

1. A method for accurate estimation of noise for data modems, said method comprising the steps of:

a) defining a pre-determined limit of a calculated variance;

b) collecting data having said calculated variance;

c) applying a correction factor to said calculated variance every time said calculated variance is more than said pre-determined limit; and

d) deriving a true variance of the data by using curve fitting.

2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said pre-determined limit of said calculated variance depends on the accuracy with which is desired to measure SNR, as well as computational resources available.

3. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising performing curve fitting on a function of the variance.

4. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising performing curve fitting on the SNR.

5. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by table lookup.

6. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by table lookup.

7. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by splines.

8. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by splines.

9. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by polynomial curve fitting.

10. A method as defined in claim 2, wherein said curve fitting used is performed by polynomial curve fitting.

11. A method as defined in claim 10, wherein polynomial fit is applied to said calculated variances that are above 0.4.

12. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising collecting ten thousand points of data.

13. A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising collecting two hundred fifty-six points of data.