Rewards method and apparatus for improved neurological training

• US 20050153267A1
• Filed: 07/19/2004
• Published: 07/14/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 01/13/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Posit Science Corp.
• Original Assignee: Neuroscience Solutions Corporation
• Inventors: Goldman, Daniel, Merzenich, Michael M., Mahncke, Henry, Zimman, Jeffrey S.
• Application Number:
  US10/894,388
• Publication Number:
  US 20050153267A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/308
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

An apparatus and method for training the sensory perceptual system in a human is provided. The apparatus and method incorporates a number of different programs to be played by the human. The programs artificially process selected portions of language elements, called phonemes, so they will be more easily distinguished by a human, and gradually improves the human'"'"'s neurological processing of the elements through repetitive stimulation. The programs continually monitor a human'"'"'s ability to distinguish the processed language elements, and adaptively configures the programs to challenge and reward the human by altering the degree of processing. Rewards are presented to the human when correct selections are made. Surprise rewards are randomly presented to the human when correct selections are made. Surprise rewards are provided randomly to the human to surprise and further reward the human during training.

Claims

1. A method for improving neuromodulatory function in a human, the method employing computer based training games, the method comprising:

providing one or more training games to the human, each of the one or more training games having a plurality of trials;

presenting one of the plurality of trials from the one or more training games to the human, as a trial;

determining whether the human correctly responded to the trial;

if the human correctly responded to the trial, determining whether an increased reward should be presented;

if an increased reward should be presented, presenting the increased reward;

if an increased reward should not be presented, but the human correctly responded to the trial, presenting a normal reward;

wherein the increased reward is not presented simply because the human correctly responded to the trial.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of presenting comprises:

presenting a stimulus to the human;

requiring a response to the stimulus from the human;

recording the human'"'"'s response.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein the stimulus comprises graphical selections on a screen.

4. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein the stimulus comprises acoustic events presented thru speakers.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 wherein the stimulus further comprises graphical selections on a screen.

displaying on a screen a scene having a plurality of selections for the human;

presenting an acoustic cue which requires a selection from the human; and

requiring the human to select one of the plurality of selections.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the trial requires the human to make a selection.

7. The method as recited in claim 6 wherein the selection is made by indicating a selection on a computing device.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of presenting includes a correct selection and at least one incorrect selection.

9. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein said step of determining determines whether the human indicated a correct selection.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of determining whether an increased reward should be presented comprises:

presenting an increased reward for correct responses, randomly.

11. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of determining whether an increased reward should be presented comprises:

presenting an increased reward for correct responses, pseudo randomly.

12. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of determining whether an increased reward should be presented comprises:

presenting an increased reward for correct responses, according to a look up table having a predefined pattern for increased rewards.

13. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of determining whether an increased reward should be presented comprises:

presenting an increased reward approximately 30% of the time that a normal reward is presented.

14. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of determining whether an increased reward should be presented comprises:

establishing a surprise percentage for the increased reward;

upon a correct response, evaluating whether the increased reward is due, based on the surprise percentage;

if the increased reward is due, providing the increased reward; and

if the increased reward is not due, provided the normal reward.

15. The method as recited in claim 14 wherein the surprise percentage is approximately 30%.

16. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein if the human correctly responded to the trial, said step of determining whether an increased reward should be presented further comprises:

if an increased reward should be presented, determining whether the increased reward coincides with a reward animation; and

if the increased reward coincides with a reward animation, presenting the normal reward instead of the increased reward.

17. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein a normal reward comprises increasing points on a scoreboard by a predetermined amount.

18. The method as recited in claim 17 wherein an increased reward comprises increasing points on a scoreboard by an increased amount which is greater than the predetermined amount.

19. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein a normal reward comprises presenting an indication of progress in the game.

20. The method as recited in claim 19 wherein an increased reward comprises presenting an indication of progress in the game which is greater than progress of the normal reward.

21. The method as recited in claim 17 wherein an increased reward comprises playing an audible reward that is different than an audible reward played when presenting the normal reward.

22. A method on a computing device for effecting positive neuromodulatory function on a human, the method providing unexpected surprise rewards, the method comprising:

within a computing game context, presenting a series of trials to a human, each of the trials having at least one correct response and at least one incorrect response;

when the human selects an incorrect response, not providing a reward;

when the human selects a correct response, determining whether the human should be presented with a normal reward, or a surprise reward; and

presenting the reward, whether normal or surprise;

wherein the surprise reward is presented randomly according to a predetermined frequency.

23. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein the computing game context comprises a game played on a device which comprises:

a display to present video information;

or

speakers to present audio information, or both; and

an input to allow human selection of choices.

24. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein each of the trials utilize acoustic stimulus as audio information.

25. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein the normal reward comprises adding a predetermined number of points to a scoreboard.

26. The method as recited in claim 25 wherein the surprise reward comprises adding an additional number of points to a scoreboard, which is greater than the predetermined number of points.

27. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein the normal reward comprises presenting an indication of progress in the game.

28. The method as recited in claim 27 wherein the surprise reward comprises presenting an indication of progress in the game which is greater than the normal reward.

29. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein the normal reward comprises presenting an indication of progress in the game.

30. The method as recited in claim 29 wherein the surprise reward comprises presenting an indication of progress in the game which is greater than progress of the normal reward.

31. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein the surprise reward is presented approximately 30 percent of the time of the normal reward.

32. The method as recited in claim 22 wherein if the surprise reward is selected, and it coincides with presentation of a reward animation, presenting a normal reward instead.

33. A method for rewarding correct selections in a computing game context designed to stimulate neurological development, the method comprising:

providing a normal reward for a correct selection;

providing a surprise reward for a correct selection; and

when a correct selection is made, occasionally presenting the surprise reward rather than the normal reward.

34. The method as recited in claim 33 wherein said step of occasionally presenting is random.

35. The method as recited in claim 33 wherein said step of occasionally presenting occurs approximately 30 percent of the time for correct selections.