Brain-based processing skill enhancement

• US 20050153268A1
• Filed: 01/14/2004
• Published: 07/14/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 01/14/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: William D. Harrison, William H. Junkin
• Original Assignee: William D. Harrison, William H. Junkin
• Inventors: Junkin, William H., Harrison, William D.
• Application Number:
  US10/756,284
• Publication Number:
  US 20050153268A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/321
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 5/00 Electrically-operated educational appliances working with questions and answers G09B7/00; simulators G09B9/00; advertising or displaying in general G09F
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

Skill enhancement tool for assessing and improving an individual'"'"'s performance in multiple domains including processing of complex audio, visual and tactile perceptual inputs, operation of complex controls via manipulation, enacting complex motor sequences and complex cognitive tasks. The invention presents complex stimuli to an individual, monitors his or her reactions to the stimuli, and, in response to the user'"'"'s reactions, changes the future stimuli to be presented in such a way as to alter the user'"'"'s brain entrainment patterns to elicit improvement.

Claims

1. A method for enhancing a skill of an individual, comprising:

determining a baseline performance level of the individual;

presenting first complex stimuli to the individual;

measuring the individual'"'"'s reactions to the first stimuli and determining a second performance level;

presenting second complex stimuli that may be the same or different from the first complex stimuli based upon the individual'"'"'s reactions.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the complex stimuli include auditory stimulation.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the complex stimuli include visual stimulation.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the complex stimuli include tactile stimulation.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the means for measurement includes means for measurement of reaction time.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the measuring includes measuring sensitivity.

7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the measuring includes measuring specificity.

8. A method according to claim 1 further comprising:

carrying out in an automated fashion an algorithm that selects the second complex stimuli so as to provide increased or decreased challenge level to the individual, as a function of the individual'"'"'s current performance level.

9. A method according to claim 1, further comprising storing and utilizing performance levels attained by the individual to set initial values in the system when the particular individual begins a subsequent session.

10. A method according to claim 1, further comprising measuring baseline, improvement, and fatigue.

11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the individual'"'"'s reaction comprises indicating a location on a display device.

12. A method according to claim 1, wherein future stimuli include extraneous signals that may distract the individual, including audio signals and/or visual signals.

13. A method according to claim 1, wherein the stimuli are selected so as to enhance the relative balance of activity in a set of at least two distinct brain areas.

14. A method according to claim 13 wherein the left anterior cortex is one of the brain areas to be balanced.

15. A method according to claim 14 wherein activity in left anterior cortex becomes increased.

16. A method according to claim 1 wherein the stimuli are altered via an algorithm for the extraction of statistically salient features.

17. A method according to claim 16 further comprising using a projection pursuit algorithm for the extraction of statistically salient features.

18. A method according to claim 16 wherein the extracting features comprises:

assigning a weight value for each feature in the presented stimulus;

incrementing weight values for those features in a stimulus presented before a performance improvement;

selecting subsequent stimulus feature combinations preferentially from those features with highest weight values.

19. A method according to claim 13 wherein particular brain areas are entrained to the range of the alpha rhythm.

20. A method according to claim 13 wherein particular brain areas are entrained to the range of the beta rhythm.

21. A method according to claim 13 wherein particular brain areas are entrained to the range of the theta rhythm.

22. A method according to claim 1 further comprising comparing the individual'"'"'s reactions across trials.

23. A method according to claim 1 wherein the skill is the performance of a particular task and the method measurably enhances the performance of an individual performing the task.

24. A method according to claim 3 wherein the visual stimuli use various spectra (colors) of light to differentially stimulate the sympathetic and/or parasympathetic system.

25. A method for enhancing skills of a first group of subjects, comprising:

determining baseline performance levels of the subjects;

presenting first complex stimuli to the subjects;

measuring the subjects reactions to the first stimuli;

ranking the subjects based upon performance level achieved, determining second stimuli that were used by those subjects who achieved highest performance levels;

applying the second stimuli to subjects.

26. A method according to claim 25 wherein the subjects are those in the first group of subjects.

27. A method according to claim 25 wherein the subjects are among those in a second group of subjects different from the first group of subjects.

28. A method for enhancing skills of a first group of subjects, comprising:

determining baseline performance levels of the subjects;

presenting first complex stimuli to the subjects;

measuring the subjects reactions to the first stimuli;

ranking the subjects based on the number of trials needed to needed to achieve some (predetermined) criterion performance level, based upon performance level achieved,

determining second stimuli that were used by those subjects who achieved the predetermined performance level with the fewest number of trials needed;

applying the second stimuli to subjects.

29. A method according to claim 28 wherein the subjects are those in the first group of subjects.

30. A method according to claim 28 wherein the subjects are among those in a second group of subjects different from the first group of subjects.

31. A method for enhancing skills of a first group of subjects, comprising:

determining baseline performance levels of the subjects;

presenting multiple stimuli the subjects;

measuring the subjects reactions to the multiple stimuli;

ranking the stimuli based on the number of times each stimulus occurred immediately before an improvement was measured;

determining further stimuli based on the ranking of stimuli that most often induced enhanced performance;

applying the identified further stimuli to subjects.

32. A method according to claim 31 wherein the subjects are those in the first group of subjects.

33. A method according to claim 31 wherein the subjects are among those in a second group of subjects different from the first group of subjects.

34. A method according to claim 31 wherein the further stimuli are created as combinations of those stimuli that occurred most often before improvement was observed.

35. A method according to claim 31 wherein the newly created combination stimuli are applied to additional subjects.

36. A method for rank ordering subjects, comprising:

presenting multiple stimuli to a first group of subjects;

measuring the subjects reactions to the multiple stimuli;

ranking the stimuli based on the number of times each stimulus occurred immediately before an improvement was measured;

determining identified stimuli based on the ranking of stimuli that most often induced enhanced performance;

testing the performance of a second group of subjects using the identified stimuli; and

ranking the subjects based on their respective performances.

37. A method according to claim 36 wherein a subset of “

most capable”

subjects are identified by selecting only those subjects achieving a rank ordering above a determined threshold value.

38. A method for rank ordering subjects comprising:

subjecting multiple subjects to stimuli and testing their respective performance;

identifying a fixed sequential set of stimuli which resulted in the best performance;

presenting the fixed, sequential set of stimuli to subjects to be ranked; and

ranking the subjects according to the fewest trials required before achieving a criterion performance level.

39. A method according to claim 38 wherein a subset of “

most capable”

subjects is identified by selecting only those subjects achieving a rank ordering above a determined threshold value.