Method and device for processing postal articles

• US 20050167342A1
• Filed: 10/15/2002
• Published: 08/04/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 10/16/2001
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Deutsche Post AG
• Original Assignee: Deutsche Post AG
• Inventors: Meier, Gunther, Vullriede, Carsten, Stumm, Dieter, Fery, Peter, Helmus, Jurgen
• Application Number:
  US10/492,954
• Publication Number:
  US 20050167342A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 209/584
• CPC Class Codes: B07C 1/00 Measures preceding sorting according to destination
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 17/00435 Details specific to central, non-customer apparatus, e.g. servers at post office or vendor
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 2017/00443 Verification of mailpieces, e.g. by checking databases
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 2017/0058 Printing of code
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 2017/00725 Reading symbols, e.g. OCR

Abstract

Disclosed herein are a method and device for processing postal articles. According to the disclosure, the method includes automatically verifying whether a postal article has an expected prepayment and placing a verification on the postal article where the postal article has the expected prepayment.

Claims

1. A method for processing mailpieces, the method comprising:

(a) sorting the mailpieces by at least one automated sorting installation;

(b) carrying out an automated checking procedure to ascertain whether the mailpiece has the expected postage;

(c) applying a code onto the mailpiece to complete the checking Drocedure, wherein the checking procedure comprises checking whether the mailpiece is marked with a payment assurance code with a processing machine and in case the mailpiece had not already been provided with a payment assurance code, applying to the mailpiece the payment assurance code by the same processing machine.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising recording data record components of the mailpieces that are not marked in a data processing system.

3. The method claim 1, wherein the sorting step (a) consists of preliminarily sorting the mailpieces in a mail center for incoming mail and in a mail center for outgoing mail.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the sorting step (a) consists of a fine sorting the mailpieces in a mail center for incoming mail and in a mail center for outgoing mail.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the automated checking procedure comprises checking whether the mailpiece has been franked with a certain type of postage.

6. A device for processing mailpieces comprising a unit for recording information that is present on at least one surface of the mailpieces, the unit comprising an image management module and a reading unit capable of checking the presence of a payment assurance code.

7. The device of claim 6, wherein the device comprises at least one computer for processing the mailpiece as a function of a marking applied onto the mailpiece, the marking indicating that the payment assurance has been effectuated.

8. A system for payment assurance, the system comprising:

(a) incoming mail centers; and

,

(b) outgoing mail centers for a preliminary sorting of mailpieces for the incoming mail centers;

wherein the incoming and outgoing mail centers each comprise;

(i) several devices for processing mailpieces, wherein the devices are capable of checking the presence of a payment assurance code on the mailpiece, and the devices are each connected to

(ii) a unit for recording information present on at least one surface of the mailpieces.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein essentially all of the devices for processing mailpieces comprise a unit for recording information present on at least one surface of the mailpieces, an image management module, and a reading unit capable of checking the presence of a payment assurance code.

13. The system of claim 8 further comprising a comparator capable of carrying out a customer-related comparison of sales of all recorded PC-franked mailpieces with a postage amount from the Postage Point.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the pre-definable time intervals is a workday for each customer.

15. The system of claim 13, wherein the comparator compares the cumulative franking amount of all recorded mailpieces to the postage amount from a postage point daily and determines the difference.

16. The system of claim 13 further comprising a processor adapted to determine whether a production value exceeds the postage amount and, if the production value exceeds the postage amount, generating a warning report, and performing an evaluation, a further processing, a storage of the comparison results per license number as well as entering the customer data into the negative file, so that this data can, at predefined time intervals, be transmitted from the central payment assurance unit to the local payment assurance unit.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein the data comprise cumulative postage amount spent.

18. The system of claim 14, wherein the data comprise postage amount from the postage point.

10. A system for payment assurance. the system comprising:

(a) a franking database capable of compiling its own data as well as data that has been transmitted bv a central payment assurance unit at pre-definable time intervals;

(b) a comparator that allows a comparison of

(i) a cumulative postage amount used for all of sender-franked mailpieces of a customer with

(ii) a cumulative amount of paid value cards and value charges.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the comparator compares and determines a difference between the sum of the amounts of generated postage and the sum of the paid value cards and value charges for each sender franking machine identification read during a specific reporting period.

12. The system of claim 10 comprising a Processor that operates. when a limit value defined for a difference detected bv the comparator is exceeded, to perform at least one of automatically exporting the data of a corresponding sender franking machine identification into an “

alarm file” and

issuing an automatic warning report and performing an evaluation, a further processing, a storage of the comparison results per sender franking machine identification as well as the entering of the sender franking machine identification into the negative file are all carrioed out.