Intelligent access control and warning system for operations management personnel

• US 20050171797A1
• Filed: 02/04/2004
• Published: 08/04/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 02/04/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Alcatel SA (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Alcatel SA (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: Abigail, Shawn Gregory
• Application Number:
  US10/770,424
• Publication Number:
  US 20050171797A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/9
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0806 for initial configuration or provisioning, e.g. plug-and-play
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/12 Discovery or management of network topologies
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/147 for predicting network behaviour
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/34 Signalling channels for network management communication
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/50 Testing arrangements

Abstract

A method of informing operations management personnel of the impact of an operations management action about to be performed is presented. Responsive to a request for the operations management action to be performed, a logic module ascertains the real world impact the operations management action will have when performed, and an informative message is formulated. In ascertaining the impact the operations management action, the logic module queries at least one managed entity roster tracking currently provisioned services and/or transactions, client lists, policies, etc. The formulated message is displayed to operations management personnel in obtaining confirmation of the request to perform the operations management action. Implementations of the logic module relate to network management systems, system management systems, transaction management system, transaction clearance systems, as well as to service provisioning applications. Advantages are derived from an informed decision making in respect of the real world impact assessment provided in real-time in connection with requesting each operations management action to be performed, and a finer granularity of control over operations management actions to be performed by operations management personnel.

Claims

1. A management system comprising:

a. a human-machine interface enabling an operator to interact therewith in submitting a request for an operations management action to be performed;

b. a managed entity roster tracking at least one managed entity; and

c. a logic module querying the managed entity roster, in connection with the request for the operations management action to be performed on the at least one managed entities, to determine and provide an indication as to the impact the operation management action would have in performing thereof.

2. The management system claimed in claim 1, further comprising one of a network management system, an element management system, an information management system, a service provisioning management system, a security management system, and a transaction management system.

3. The transaction management system claimed in claim 2, further comprising one of:

an online transaction management system, and a transaction clearance management system.

4. The information management system claimed in claim 2, further comprising one of:

a database management system, and a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) repository management system.

5. The management system claimed in claim 1, wherein the management roster further comprises one of:

network management database tracking managed entities, a client database tracking customer profiles, a transaction database tracking transactions, a service level agreement repository tracking customer service contracts, a policy repository, and operator permissions.

6. A service provisioning application comprising:

a. a human-machine interface enabling an operator to interact therewith in submitting a request for an operations management action to be performed;

b. a managed entity roster tracking information in respect of at least one managed entity; and

c. a logic module querying the managed entity database, in connection with the request for the operations management action to be performed on the at least one managed entities, to determine and provide an indication as to the impact the operation management action would have in performing thereof.

7. The management system claimed in claim 6, wherein the management roster further comprises one of:

network management database tracking managed entities, a client database tracking customer profiles, a transaction database tracking transactions, a service level agreement repository tracking customer service contracts, a policy repository, and operator permissions.

8. A method of providing an impact indication in performing an operations management action comprising the steps of:

a. obtaining an indication of the operations management action to be performed;

b. ascertaining the real world impact of the operations management action to be performed; and

c. formulating an informative message detailing the real world impact in performing the operations management action.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein obtaining the indication the method further comprises a step of:

trapping the operations management action to be performed.

10. The method claimed in claim 8, wherein obtaining the indication the method further comprises a step of:

receiving an indication of the operations management action to be performed.

11. The method claimed in claim 8, wherein ascertaining the real world impact of the operations management action, the method further includes querying a managed entity roster.

12. The method claimed in claim 8, further comprising a step of:

displaying the informative message to operations management personnel in connection with obtaining confirmation of the request for the operations management action to be performed, the operations management personnel thus being able to make a informed decision in requesting the operations management actions to be performed.

13. The method claimed in claim 12, further comprising a step of:

allowing the request for performing the operations management action subsequent to receiving an informed confirmation to proceed based on the displayed message stating the real world impact of the operations management action.

14. The method claimed in claim 8, further comprising a step of:

selectively denying the operations management action request based on the real world impact ascertained.

15. The method claimed in claim 14, wherein ascertaining the real world impact of the operations management action, the method further comprising a step of:

determining an impact level.

16. The method claimed in claim 15, further comprising a step of:

determining an impact type from;

a network impact, a service impact, and a customer impact.

17. The method claimed in claim 16, further comprising a step of:

weighting each impact type.

18. The method claimed in claim 14, wherein the step of selectively denying the operations management action request based on the real world impact ascertained is relaxed during periods of scheduled maintenance.

19. The method claimed in claim 8, further comprising a step of:

selectively denying the operations management action request based on a combination of the real world impact ascertained and the span of control of the individual operator which submitted the operations management action to be performed.

20. The method claimed in claim 19, further comprising a step of:

selectively denying the operations management action request submitted in respect of;

a 911 service provisioning equipment, and a 911 provisioned service connection.

21. The method claimed in claim 19, wherein the step of selectively denying the operations management action request based on the real world impact ascertained is relaxed during periods of scheduled maintenance.