Tensegrity joints for prosthetic, orthotic, and robotic devices

• US 20050216097A1
• Filed: 03/16/2005
• Published: 09/29/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 03/16/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: FitBionic, Inc.
• Original Assignee: FitBionic, Inc.
• Inventors: Rifkin, Jerome
• Application Number:
  US11/080,972
• Publication Number:
  US 20050216097A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 623/53
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/60 Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/64 Knee joints
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/66 Feet; Ankle joints
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/5003 having damping means, e.g. shock absorbers for implantable joints A61F2002/30563
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/5072 having spring elements spring-biased locking means A61F2002/30505; for implantable joints A61F2002/30565; other elastic means A61F2002/5007
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/6621 Toes
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/6628 Big toes
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/6635 Metatarsals
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2002/6642 Heels

Abstract

Embodments of the invention relate to a prosthetic, orthotic, or robotic foot having at least two joints. One joint is located in a position analogous to the human MTP joint, and the other is located in a position analogous to the human subtalar joint. Motions of these two joints are mechanically couples. Furthermore, these joints are created using “tensegrity” design principals, where connections between the compression members are made by a network of tension members. These tension members create axes of motion, and limitations on those axes of motion. Actuators or linear elastic “springs” are use to alter the torque/angular deflection response curve of these joints, so that the rollover profile of the human foot can be duplicated by this invention.

Claims

1. At least a portion of an artificial prosthetic or orthotic foot for a human, or a robotic foot comprising:

an artificial midfoot joint;

an artificial metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint; and

a mechanical coupler configured to coordinate movement of the artificial midfoot joint relative to the artificial MTP joint.

2. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the mechanical coupler is configured to move the artificial midfoot joint into plantarflexion when the artificial MTP joint moves into dorsiflexion.

3. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, further comprising an artificial toe and an artificial forefoot;

wherein the artificial MTP joint connects the artificial toe to the artificial forefoot.

4. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, further comprising an artificial forefoot and an artificial heel;

wherein the artificial midfoot joint connects the artificial forefoot to the artificial heel.

5. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the coordinated movement of the artificial midfoot joint relative to the artificial MTP joint substantially corresponds to a coordinated movement of a natural midfoot joint relative to a natural MTP joint during ambulation of a natural human foot.

6. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, further comprising an artificial toe,

wherein when a weight is removed from the artificial toe by a contralateral leg heelstrike gait event, the mechanical coupler is configured provide a spring-like action that pulls the artificial midfoot joint and the artificial MTP joint and causes them to move substantially synchronously, rotating in opposite directions,

wherein the spring-like action releases energy that propels the at least a portion of the artificial forward and into a swing phase gait event.

7. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, further comprising an artificial toe and an artificial heel,

wherein the mechanical coupler is configured to coordinate movement of the artificial toe relative to the artificial heel.

8. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 9, wherein mechanical coupler is a tension member,

wherein the tension member is configured to move the artificial toe substantially synchronously with the artificial heel when the tension member is in a taut configuration.

9. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the at least a portion of an artificial foot is a whole artificial foot.

10. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein at least one of the artificial midfoot joint and the artificial MTP joint includes a tensegrity joint.

11. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the artificial midfoot joint has a range of motion, from a substantially maximal excursion in a plantarflexion direction to a substantially maximal excursion in a dorsiflexion direction, between about 0.1 degrees and about 120 degrees.

12. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 11, wherein the artificial midfoot joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 0.5 degrees and about 60 degrees.

13. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 12, wherein the artificial midfoot joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 1 degree and about 30 degrees.

14. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 13, wherein the artificial midfoot joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 1 degree and about 10 degrees.

15. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the artificial midfoot joint has a range of motion, from a substantially maximal excursion in a plantarflexion direction to a substantially maximal excursion in a dorsiflexion direction, substantially similar to a corresponding natural human subtalar joint.

16. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the artificial midfoot joint has a range of motion, from a substantially maximal excursion in a plantarflexion direction to a substantially maximal excursion in a dorsiflexion direction, substantially similar to a sum of ranges of motion of a human ankle and human subtalar joints.

17. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from a substantially maximal excursion in a plantarflexion direction to a substantially maximal excursion in a dorsiflexion direction, between about 0.1 degrees and about 340 degrees.

18. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 17, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 0.5 degrees and about 60 degrees.

19. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 18, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 1 degree and about 30 degrees.

20. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 19, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 1 degree and about 15 degrees.

21. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from a substantially maximal excursion in a plantarflexion direction to a substantially maximal excursion in a dorsiflexion direction, substantially similar to a corresponding natural human MTP joint.

22. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the mechanical coupler has elastic properties.

23. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the mechanical coupler is configured to store energy.

24. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the mechanical coupler is configured to release stored energy when the artificial midfoot joint and the artificial MTP joint move substantially synchronously, rotating in opposite directions.

25. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the mechanical coupler is configured to compliantly couple the movement of the artificial MTP joint relative to the artificial midfoot joint.

26. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 1, wherein the mechanical coupler is configured such that after the mechanical coupler is pulled taut, the mechanical coupler is configured to allow for an input of energy to one or more portions of the artificial foot as the artificial MTP joint and the artificial midfoot joint and causes them to move substantially synchronously, rotating in opposite directions

27. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 20, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 1 degree and about 10 degrees.

28. The at least a portion of an artificial foot of claim 27, wherein the artificial MTP joint has a range of motion, from the substantially maximal excursion in the plantarflexion direction to the substantially maximal excursion in the dorsiflexion direction, between about 1 degree and about 5 degrees.