Energy analyzer for a refrigeration system

• US 20050223720A1
• Filed: 06/09/2004
• Published: 10/13/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 04/07/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: York International Corporation (Johnson Controls International plc)
• Original Assignee: York International Corporation (Johnson Controls International plc)
• Inventors: Hubbard, Roy Samuel Jr., Miller, Wanda Jean
• Application Number:
  US10/864,895
• Publication Number:
  US 20050223720A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 62/129
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/30 for purposes related to the operation of the system, e.g. for safety or monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: F24F 11/47 Responding to energy costs
• CPC Class Codes: F25B 2500/19 Calculation of parameters
• CPC Class Codes: F25B 2600/021 Inverters therefor
• CPC Class Codes: F25B 2700/21161 of the fluid heated by the condenser
• CPC Class Codes: F25B 49/00 Arrangement or mounting of control or safety devices
• CPC Class Codes: F25B 49/02 for compression type machines, plants or systems
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 30/70 Efficient control or regulation technologies, e.g. for control of refrigerant flow, motor or heating

Abstract

An energy analyzer for a refrigeration system includes a refrigeration circuit having a compressor, a condenser and an evaporator, and a first drive type. A memory device contains an equation correlating refrigeration system operating performance using a first drive type to that of a second drive type without requiring the second drive type. The equation defines a polynomial expression having different combinations of two variables, the temperature of water entering the condenser, and the ratio defined by the second drive type input power divided by the design second drive type power. Each of these values is continuously calculated during operation of the refrigeration system. The equation solution correlates to the second drive type input power divided by the design second drive type input power. Energy costs associated with operation of the refrigeration system using the second drive type can then be calculated for comparison with the first drive type.

Claims

1. A method for comparing costs associated with operating a refrigeration system using a first drive type versus a second drive type, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a refrigeration system using a first drive type;

providing an equation to calculate operating cost of the refrigeration system using a second drive type, the equation incorporating at least one operating parameter of the refrigeration system;

measuring the at least one operating parameter of the refrigeration system;

determining a cost associated with operation of the refrigeration system using the first drive type;

calculating a cost associated with operation of the refrigeration system using the second drive type with the equation and the measured at least one operating parameter; and

comparing the cost associated with operating the refrigeration system using the first drive type with the cost associated with operating the refrigeration system using the second drive type.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of calculating a cost includes the step of:

determining an amount of energy required by the first drive type to operate the refrigeration system for a predetermined time.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of calculating a cost further includes the step of:

calculating a ratio based on the amount of energy required by the first drive type divided by a predetermined amount of energy required for the first drive type; and

wherein the calculated ratio is incorporated into the equation.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the first drive type is one of a constant speed drive and a variable speed drive and the second drive type is one of a constant speed drive and a variable speed drive.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the first drive type is a constant speed drive and the second drive type is a variable speed drive.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the first drive type is a variable speed drive and the second drive type is a constant speed drive.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing an equation includes providing a polynomial.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the step of providing a polynomial includes inputting values associated with operation of the refrigeration system.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one measured operating parameter is at least one parameter selected from the group consisting of temperature of a fluid entering a condenser, temperature of a fluid leaving a condenser, saturated condensing temperature and temperature differential between evaporator temperature and condenser temperature.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

repeating the step of comparing the cost associated with operating the refrigeration system using the constant speed drive with the cost associated with operating the refrigeration system using the variable speed drive at a predetermined time interval for a predetermined time duration; and

storing results of repeated cost comparisons.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing an equation includes providing a polynomial in the form

C1+(C2×

A)+(C3×

A²)+(C4×

B)+(C5×

A×

B)+(C6×

A²×

B)+(C7×

B²)+(C8×

A×

B²)+(C9×

A×

B²), wherein C1 through C9 are constants, A is a ratio of first drive type input kW to first drive type design kW and B is the at least one measured operating parameter.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the at least one measured operating parameter is at least one parameter selected from the group consisting of temperature of a fluid entering a condenser, temperature of a fluid leaving a condenser, saturated condensing temperature and temperature differential between evaporator temperature and condenser temperature.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of providing an equation includes determining constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial in response to a refrigerant used in the refrigeration system.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of providing an equation includes determining constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial in response to a condenser fluid used in the refrigeration system.

15. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of providing an equation includes determining constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial in response to an evaporator fluid used in the refrigeration system.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the evaporator fluids are selected from the group consisting of water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, calcium chloride brine and sodium chloride brine.

17. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of providing an equation includes determining constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial in response to a type of compressor used in the refrigeration system.

18. A refrigeration system comprising:

a refrigeration circuit having a compressor driven by a motor, a condenser and an evaporator connected in a closed loop;

a first drive type to drive the compressor motor;

at least one sensor to measure at least one operating parameter of the refrigeration circuit;

a computer system comprising a microprocessor and a memory device and at least one computer program, the at least one computer program comprising;

means for calculating operating costs of the refrigeration circuit using the first drive type and a second drive type;

means for calculating an amount of energy used by the first drive type in the refrigeration circuit for a predetermined time;

means for calculating a first ratio based on the amount of energy used by the first drive type divided by a predetermined amount of energy required by the first drive type;

means for calculating a second ratio based on the amount of energy required by the second drive type divided by a predetermined amount of energy required by the second drive type; and

wherein the second ratio is determined from an equation having the first ratio and the at least one operating parameter as inputs to the equation.

19. The refrigeration system of claim 18 wherein the first drive type is a constant speed drive and the second drive type is a variable speed drive.

20. The refrigeration system of claim 18 wherein the first drive type is a variable speed drive and the second drive type is a constant speed drive.

21. The refrigeration system of claim 18 wherein the first drive type is a first constant speed drive and the second drive type is a second constant speed drive.

22. The refrigeration system of claim 18 wherein the first drive type is a first variable speed drive and the second drive type is a second variable speed drive.

23. The refrigeration system of claim 19 wherein the at least one computer program repeatedly compares the cost associated with operating the refrigeration circuit using the constant speed drive with the cost associated with operating the refrigeration circuit using the variable speed drive and stores results of comparisons.

24. The refrigeration system of claim 18 wherein the at least one measured operating parameter is selected from the group consisting of temperature of a fluid entering a condenser, temperature of a fluid leaving a condenser, saturated condensing temperature and temperature differential between an evaporator temperature and condenser temperature.

25. The refrigeration system of claim 19 wherein the equation is a polynomial.

26. The refrigeration system of claim 25 wherein the polynomial is in the form

C1+(C2×

A)+(C3×

A²)+(C4×

B)+(C5×

A×

B)+(C6×

A²×

B)+(C7×

B²)+(C8×

A×

B²)+(C9×

A²×

B²), wherein C1 through C9 are constants, A is a ratio of CSD input kW to CSD design kW and B is the at least one measured operating parameter.

27. The refrigeration system of claim 26 wherein the at least one measured operating parameter is selected from the group consisting of temperature of a fluid entering a condenser, temperature of a fluid leaving a condenser, saturated condensing temperature and temperature differential between an evaporator temperature and condenser temperature.

28. The refrigeration system of claim 26 wherein the constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial are determined in response to the refrigerant system using different refrigerants.

29. The refrigeration system of claim 26 wherein the constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial are determined in response to the refrigerant system using different condenser fluids.

30. The refrigeration system of claim 26 wherein the constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial are determined in response to the refrigerant system using a different type of compressor.

31. The refrigeration system of claim 26 wherein the constants C1 through C9 of the polynomial are determined in response to the refrigerant system using different evaporator fluids.

32. The refrigeration system of claim 31 wherein the evaporator fluids are selected from the group consisting of water, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, calcium chloride brine and sodium chloride brine.

33. A method for comparing costs associated with operating a refrigeration system using a constant speed drive versus a variable speed drive, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a refrigeration system using a constant speed drive;

providing an equation to calculate operating cost of the refrigeration system using a variable speed drive, the equation incorporating at least one operating parameter of the refrigeration system;

measuring the at least one operating parameter of the refrigeration system;

determining a cost associated with operation of the refrigeration system using the constant speed drive;

calculating a cost associated with operation of the refrigeration system using the variable speed drive using the equation and the measured at least one operating parameter; and

comparing the cost associated with operating the refrigeration system using the constant speed drive with the cost associated with operating the refrigeration system using the variable speed drive.