Internet-based job placement system for managing proposals for screened and pre-qualified participants

• US 20050228709A1
• Filed: 04/08/2005
• Published: 10/13/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 04/08/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hillel Segal
• Original Assignee: Hillel Segal
• Inventors: Segal, Hillel
• Application Number:
  US11/102,925
• Publication Number:
  US 20050228709A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/9
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063112 Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

The present automated job placement system uses a multi-step process, with advanced screening and pre-qualification of candidates and positions, to match qualified prospective employees with job openings. The system supports two types of participant match processes that involve prospective employers and prospective employees, each acting simultaneously. One match process involves prospective employees offering proposals for available jobs, and the second match process involves prospective employers offering proposals to prospective employees. Both types of participant match processes use similar advance screening and pre-qualification procedures, with all proposal exchanges taking place on an Internet website. In addition, this automated job placement system provides built-in deadlines for each step, with an easy-to-use proposal tracking and active proposal reminder mechanism. This unique use of deadline-contingent proposals and counter-proposals greatly enhances the likelihood that a negotiated agreement will be reached that is beneficial for both parties. The overall state-of-the-art functionality thus provided is a significant improvement over existing Internet-based job search systems.

Claims

1. An automated job placement system connected to a communication medium for automatically matching participants who provide respective sets of information and criteria, comprising:

job posting means for receiving a set of information over said communication medium from a prospective employer that defines a job posting and a set of criteria that identify qualifications of prospective employees for said job posting;

prospective employee means for receiving information over said communication medium from at least one prospective employee that identifies qualifications of at least one prospective employee;

pre-qualification means for enabling the review of said information received from a prospective employee that identifies qualifications of said prospective employee to approve said prospective employee as qualified to place employment proposals for a selected job posting; and

match means for automatically matching at least one approved prospective employee with said job posting.

2. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 1 wherein said job posting means comprises:

skills checklist means for presenting said prospective employee with a list of specific tasks unique to said job posting.

3. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 2 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

skills verification means for automatically correlating data input by said prospective employee over said communication medium in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said job posting with said set of criteria that identify qualifications of prospective employees for said job posting to generate a match when said data input by said prospective employee satisfies said set of criteria.

4. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 3 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

positive feedback means for automatically notifying said prospective employee when said data input by said prospective employee in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said job posting is approved as indicating that said prospective employee is qualified to place offers on said job posting.

5. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 3 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

negative feedback means for automatically notifying said prospective employee when said information received from said prospective employee is declined as indicating that said prospective employee is unqualified to place an employment proposal for said job posting.

6. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 3 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

employer skills verification means for submitting data, input by said prospective employee, to said employer when said data input by said prospective employee fails to satisfy said set of criteria.

7. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 6 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

positive feedback means for automatically notifying said prospective employee when said data input by said prospective employee in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said job posting is approved by said employer as indicating that said prospective employee is qualified to place offers on said job posting.

8. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 6 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

negative feedback means for automatically notifying said prospective employee when said information received from said prospective employee is declined as indicating that said prospective employee is unqualified to place an employment proposal for said job posting.

9. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 1 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

automated feedback means for automatically notifying said prospective employee when said information received from said prospective employee is approved as indicating that said prospective employee is qualified to place an employment proposal for said job posting.

10. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 1 further comprising:

participant proposal means for receiving an employment proposal from a prospective employee for a one of said job postings; and

proposal delivery means for automatically delivering said received employment proposal to said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings.

11. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 10 further comprising:

interaction means for exchanging proposals between said prospective employee for a one of said job postings and said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings.

12. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 11 further comprising:

tracking means for maintaining a record of said proposals exchanged between said prospective employee for a one of said job postings and said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings.

13. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 12 further comprising:

deadline means for maintaining a record of a deadline indicative of an expiration of a presently active proposal.

14. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 13 further comprising:

reminder means, responsive to said deadline means, for presenting said prospective employee for a one of said job postings and said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings with an indication of said deadline.

15. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 12 further comprising:

summary means, responsive to said tracking means, for displaying a record of said proposals exchanged between said prospective employee and said prospective employer to at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer.

16. The automated job placement system for automatically matching participants of claim 15 further comprising:

display management means, responsive to input received from at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer concurrent with said summary means displaying said record of said proposals, for enabling said at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer to modify the display of said record of said proposals to present information in a form requested by said at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer.

17. A method for automatically matching participants who provide respective sets of information and criteria, using an automated job placement system that is connected to a communication medium, comprising:

receiving a set of information over said communication medium from a prospective employer that defines a job posting and a set of criteria that identify qualifications of prospective employees for said job posting;

receiving information over said communication medium from a prospective employee that identifies qualifications of said prospective employee;

enabling the review of said information received from said prospective employee that identifies qualifications of said prospective employee to approve said prospective employee as qualified to place employment proposals for a selected job posting; and

automatically matching at least one prospective employee with said job posting.

18. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 17 wherein said step of receiving a set of information from a prospective employer comprises:

presenting said prospective employee with a list of specific tasks unique to said job posting.

19. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 18 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

correlating data input by said prospective employee over said communication medium in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said job posting with said set of criteria that identify qualifications of prospective employees for said job posting.

20. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 19 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

automatically notifying said prospective employee when said data input by said prospective employee in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said job posting is approved as indicating that said prospective employee is qualified to place offers on said job posting.

21. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 19 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

automatically notifying said prospective employee when said information received from said prospective employee is declined as indicating that said prospective employee is unqualified to place an employment proposal for said job posting.

22. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 19 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

submitting data, input by said prospective employee, to said employer when said data input by said prospective employee fails to satisfy said set of criteria.

23. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 22 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

automatically notifying said prospective employee when said data input by said prospective employee in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said job posting is approved by said employer as indicating that said prospective employee is qualified to place offers on said job posting.

24. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 22 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

automatically notifying said prospective employee when said information received from said prospective employee is declined as indicating that said prospective employee is unqualified to place an employment proposal for said job posting.

25. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 17 wherein said step of enabling comprises:

automatically notifying said prospective employee when said information received from said prospective employee is approved as indicating that said prospective employee is qualified to place an employment proposal for said job posting.

26. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 17 further comprising:

receiving an employment proposal from a prospective employee for a one of said job postings; and

automatically delivering said received employment proposal to said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings.

27. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 26 further comprising:

exchanging proposals between said prospective employee for a one of said job postings and said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings.

28. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 27 further comprising:

maintaining a record of said proposals exchanged between said prospective employee for a one of said job postings and said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings.

29. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 28 further comprising:

maintaining a record of a deadline indicative of an expiration of a presently active proposal.

30. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 29 further comprising:

presenting, in response to said deadline, said prospective employee for a one of said job postings and said prospective employer who submitted said one of said job postings with an indication of said deadline.

31. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 28 further comprising:

summary means, responsive to said tracking means, for displaying a record of said proposals exchanged between said prospective employee and said prospective employer to at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer.

32. The method for automatically matching participants of claim 31 further comprising:

display management means, responsive to input received from at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer concurrent with said summary means displaying said record of said proposals, for enabling said at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer to modify the display of said record of said proposals to present information in a form requested by said at least one of said prospective employee and said prospective employer.

33. An automated match system for automatically matching participants who provide respective sets of information and criteria to a computer system that is connected to a communication medium, comprising:

posting means for receiving a set of information over said communication medium from an offerer participant that defines a posting comprising a proposal and a set of criteria that identify qualifications of prospective participants for this proposal;

participant means for receiving information over said communication medium from at least one party that identifies qualifications of at least one other proposing party;

pre-qualification means for enabling the review of said information received from said proposing participant that identifies qualifications of said proposing participant to approve said proposing participant as qualified to place a proposal; and

match means for automatically matching a proposing participant with said posting.

34. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 33 wherein said posting means comprises:

checklist means for presenting said proposing participant with a list of specific criteria unique to said posting.

35. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 34 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

verification means for correlating data input over said communication medium by said proposing participant in response to said list of specific criteria unique to said posting with said set of criteria that identify qualifications of prospective proposals.

36. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 35 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

positive feedback means for automatically notifying said proposing participant when said data input by said proposing participant in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said posting is approved as indicating that said proposing participant is qualified to place offers on said posting; and

negative feedback means for automatically notifying said proposing participant when said information received from said proposing participant is declined as indicating that said proposing participant is unqualified to place a proposal for said posting.

37. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 35 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

proposing participant skills verification means for submitting data, input by said proposing participant, to said offerer participant when said data input by said proposing participant fails to satisfy said set of criteria;

positive feedback means for automatically notifying said proposing participant when said data input by said proposing participant in response to said list of specific tasks unique to said posting is approved by said offerer participant as indicating that said proposing participant is qualified to place offers on said posting; and

negative feedback means for automatically notifying said proposing participant when said information received from said proposing participant is declined as indicating that said proposing participant is unqualified to place a proposal for said posting.

38. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 33 wherein said pre-qualification means comprises:

automated feedback means for automatically notifying said proposing participant when said information received from said proposing participant is approved as indicating that said proposing participant is qualified to place a proposal for said posting.

39. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 33 further comprising:

participant proposal means for receiving a proposal from a proposing participant for a one of said postings;

proposal delivery means for automatically delivering said received proposal to said proposing participant who submitted said one of said postings;

interaction means for exchanging proposals between said proposing participant for a one of said postings and said offerer participant who submitted said one of said postings.

40. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 39 further comprising:

tracking means for maintaining a record of said proposals exchanged between said proposing participant for a one of said postings and said offerer participant who submitted said one of said postings.

41. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 40 further comprising:

deadline means for maintaining a record of a deadline indicative of an expiration of a presently active proposal; and

reminder means, responsive to said deadline means, for presenting said proposing participant for a one of said postings and said offerer participant who submitted said one of said postings with an indication of said deadline.

42. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 40 further comprising:

summary means, responsive to said tracking means, for displaying a record of said proposals exchanged between said offerer participant and said proposing participant to at least one of said proposing participant and said offerer participant.

43. The automated match system for automatically matching participants of claim 42 further comprising:

display management means, responsive to input received from at least one of said offerer participant and said proposing participant concurrent with said summary means displaying said record of said proposals, for enabling said at least one of said offerer participant and said proposing participant to modify the display of said record of said proposals to present information in a form requested by said at least one of said offerer participant and said proposing participant.