Method of computer-assisted ligament balancing and component placement in total knee arthroplasty

• US 20050234332A1
• Filed: 01/18/2005
• Published: 10/20/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 01/16/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Smith & Nephew Incorporated (Smith & Nephew PLC)
• Original Assignee: Smith & Nephew Incorporated (Smith & Nephew PLC)
• Inventors: Murphy, Stephen B.
• Application Number:
  US11/037,898
• Publication Number:
  US 20050234332A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/426
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 17/154 for preparing bone for knee prosthesis
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 17/155 Cutting femur
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 17/157 Cutting tibia
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/102 Modelling of surgical devices, implants or prosthesis
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/105 Modelling of the patient, e.g. for ligaments or bones
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/2055 Optical tracking systems
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/2072 Reference field transducer attached to an instrument or patient
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/256 having a database of accessory information, e.g. including context sensitive help or scientific articles
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2090/365 augmented reality, i.e. correlating a live optical image with another image
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/10 Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/20 Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/25 User interfaces for surgical systems
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4528 Joints A61B5/4533, A61B5/4538 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4533 Ligaments
• CPC Class Codes: A61F 2/38 for elbows or knees

Abstract

Systems, methods and processes for computer-assisted soft tissue balancing, including ligament balancing, determining surgical cuts, and positioning or placement of the components of the prosthetic knee during TKR. The improved methods, systems, and processes consider and correlate anatomical landmarks and dynamic interactions of the knee bones and soft tissues. The improved methods, systems and processes resolve several problems related to the prosthetic knee component positioning and soft-tissue balancing during computer-assisted TKR. The improved methods, systems and processes are flexible and versatile, provide reliable recommendations to the surgeon, and improve restoration of the knee function and patient recovery.

Claims

1. A system for use by a surgeon in the course of computer-assisted total arthroplasty on a patient'"'"'s knee. The system comprises:

at least one first fiducial associated with a femur;

at least one second fiducial associated with a tibia;

a tracking functionality capable of tracking a position and orientation of the at least one first fiducial and the at least one second fiducial;

a computer, wherein the computer is

adapted to receive and store information from the tracking functionality on the position and orientation of the at least one first fiducial and the at least one second fiducial,

adapted to acquire information during kinematic testing relating to the position and orientation of the at least one first fiducial and the at least one second fiducial;

adapted to store in memory a knee variable determined based on an anatomical method and a knee variable based on a dynamic method;

adapted to assess the difference between the variable based on the anatomical method and the variable based on the dynamic method; and

adapted to provide the recommendations to the surgeon on adjustment of the soft tissues of the knee with the purpose of reducing the difference between the variable based on the anatomical method and the variable based on the dynamical method.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

an imager for obtaining at least one image of the tibia or the femur, wherein the computer is adapted to receive from the imager and store the at least one image of the tibia or the femur; and

a monitor adapted to receive information from the computer in order to display the at least one image of the tibia or the femur.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a surgical instrument associated with one or more fiducials and adapted for navigation and positioning at the knee, wherein the one or more fiducials associated with the instruments are adapted to be tracked by the tracking functionality.

4. The system of claim 1 further comprising a prosthetic component associated with one or more fiducials and adapted for navigation and positioning at the knee, wherein the one or more fiducials associated with the prosthetic component are adapted to be tracked by the tracking functionality

5. The system of claim 1, further comprising a cutting guide for positioning at the femur or the tibia, wherein the cutting guide is associated with one or more fiducials, and the one or more fiducials associated with the cutting jig are adapted to be tracked by the tracking functionality.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein the position of the cutting guide at the femur or the tibial is be adjustable in at least one degree of rotational or at least one degree of translational freedom.

7. A method of computer-assisted total arthroplasty on a patient'"'"'s knee, comprising the steps of:

registering with a computer at least one first fiducial associated with the femur; and

at least one second fiducial associated with the tibia;

tracking position and orientation of the at least one first fiducial and the at least one second fiducial with a tracking functionality;

using the computer adapted to receive signals and store information from the tracking functionality on the position and orientation of the at least one first fiducial and thus the femur; and

the at least one second fiducial and thus the tibia;

using the computer to store in memory a knee variable determined based on an anatomical method and a knee variable based on a dynamic method;

using the computer to assess the difference between the variable based on the anatomical method and the variable based on the dynamic method; and

using the computer to provide the recommendations to the surgeon on adjustment of the soft tissues of the knee with the purpose of reducing the difference between the variable based on the anatomical method and the variable based on the dynamical method.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising positioning a cutting guide at the femur;

and resecting the femur based on the recommendations.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising the steps of:

using an imager for obtaining at least one image of a tibia or a femur, wherein the computer is adapted to receive from the imager and store the at least one image of the tibia or the femur; and

using a monitor adapted to receive information from the computer to display the at least one image of the tibia or the femur.

10. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of registering with the computer and navigating and positioning at the knee of a surgical instrument associated with one or more fiducials.

11. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of registering with the computer and navigating and positioning at the knee of prosthetic components associated with one or more fiducials.

12. The method of claim 7, further comprising the steps of registering with the computer and navigating and positioning at the femur or the tibia of a cutting guide associated with one or more fiducials.

13. The method of claim 7, wherein a position of the cutting guide at the femur or the tibia is adjustable at the femur or the tibia in at least one degree of rotational or at least one degree of translational freedom.

14. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of using the computer to provide recommendations on selecting a prosthetic component at the knee.

15. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of using the computer to provide recommendations on positioning a prosthetic component at the knee.

16. The method of claim 7, further comprising adjusting the soft tissues of the knee.

17. The method of claim 7, wherein adjusting the soft tissues of the knee comprises at least one of releasing or contracting ligaments.

18. A method of computer-assisted soft tissue balancing in a knee during total knee arthroplasty, comprising the steps of:

a. providing a computer comprising a memory, and a tracking functionality, wherein the tracking functionality is adapted to track position and orientation of fiducials and transmitting information on the position and orientation of the fiducials to the computer functionality;

b. associating at least one first fiducial with a femur;

c. associating at least one second fiducial with a tibia;

d. registering the femur and the tibia with the computer;

e. establishing in the computer memory femoral and tibial coordinate systems;

f. establishing in the computer memory a mechanical axis of the femur and a mechanical axis of the tibia;

g. establishing in the computer memory a femoral resection plane perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur, and a proposed tibial resection plane perpendicular to a mechanical axis of the tibia;

h. distracting the knee in flexion and extension in at least one of varus/valgus, AP drawer, or rotation tests, and establishing in a computer memory femoral resection planes perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia in flexion and extension;

i. calculating an angle between the femoral resection planes perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia to the femoral resection planes perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur, whereby state of the soft tissue balance of the knee is represented in flexion and extension by the angle;

j. using the computer to provide recommendations to the surgeon on adjustment of soft tissues with the purpose of reducing the angle;

k. adjusting the soft tissues; and

l. repeating the steps h through k until the femoral resection planes perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia to the femoral resection planes perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur converge.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising using the computer to provide recommendations on femoral cutting planes based on convergence of planes in step l.

20. The method of claim 18, further comprising positioning a cutting guide at the femur;

and resecting the femur based on the recommendations.