System and method for searching using a temporal dimension

• US 20050234877A1
• Filed: 04/08/2004
• Published: 10/20/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 04/08/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Yu, Philip Shi-Lung
• Application Number:
  US10/820,888
• Publication Number:
  US 20050234877A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 7/00 Methods or arrangements for processing data by operating upon the order or content of the data handled logic circuits H03K19/00

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a system and a method for generating a temporally ranked set of search results in response to a query. Each result in the set of search results can be ranked temporally or based on the reputation associated with authors of each result and the reputation associated with the repository where each result is located. Temporal ranking takes into account a present importance weight and a future importance weight are assigned to each result. The present importance of each result uses creation date, publication date, in-link dates and search frequency, and the future importance uses an aging factor based on the elapsed time from publication for each search result and a rate at which each search result decreases in importance. Temporal ranking can be applied as a modification of existing and common search engine algorithms include PageRank and HITS.

Claims

1. A method for searching data comprising:

generating a temporally ranked set of search results in response to a query, the step of generating a temporally the temporally ranked set of search results comprising;

generating an initial set of search results; and

ranking at least a portion of the initial set of search results based on temporal factors to generate the temporally ranked set of search results.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating the initial set of search results comprises using reputation based factors or content based factors.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of ranking the initial search results comprises assigning a present importance weight and a future importance weight to each result in the initial set of search results.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:

determining the present importance of each result using creation date, publication date, in-link dates, search frequency or combinations thereof; and

determining the future importance using an aging factor based on the elapsed time from publication for each search result and a rate at which each search result decreases in importance.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the data being searched comprises web-based data and the method further comprises obtaining time and date information about each search result from meta content associated with the search result.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying a first portion of the initial search results having creation dates after a pre-determined threshold date; and

identifying a second portion of the initial search results having creation dates before the pre-determined threshold date;

wherein the step of ranking at least a portion of the search results comprises ranking the second portion.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising ranking the first portion of the initial search results based on a reputation associated with authors of each result, a reputation associated with a repository where each result is located or a combination of author and repository reputation.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising ranking the initial set of search results based upon the reputation or content of each result.

9. A computer readable medium containing a computer executable code that when read by a computer causes the computer to perform a method for searching data comprising generating a temporally ranked set of search results in response to a query, said step of generating a temporally ranked set of search results comprising:

generating an initial set of search results; and

ranking at least a portion of the initial set of search results based on temporal factors to generate the temporally ranked set of search results.

10. The computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the step of ranking the initial search results comprises assigning a present importance weight and a future importance weight to each result in the initial set of search results.

11. The computer readable medium of claim 10, further comprising:

determining the present importance of each result using creation date, publication date, in-link dates, search frequency or combinations thereof; and

determining the future importance using an aging factor based on the elapsed time from publication for each search result and a rate at which each search result decreases in importance.

12. The computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the data being search comprises web-based data and the method further comprises obtaining time and date information about each search result from meta content associated with the search result.

13. The computer readable medium of claim 9, further comprising:

identifying a first portion of the initial search results having creation dates after a pre-determined threshold date; and

identifying a second portion of the initial search results having creation dates before the pre-determined threshold date;

wherein the step of ranking at least a portion of the search results comprises ranking the second portion.

14. The computer readable medium of claim 10, further comprising ranking the first portion of the initial search results based on a reputation associated with authors of each result, a reputation associated with a repository where each result is located or a combination of author and repository reputation.

15. A method comprising:

offering a service to customers that generates a temporally ranked set of search results in response to a query; and

modifying one or more parameters of the service in response to customer input.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the parameters comprise rate of phase-out of old data, decay rate, temporal criteria, reputation ranking techniques or combinations thereof.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein further comprising modifying the parameters based upon the topic or repository being searched.