Methods and computer program products for assessing language comprehension in infants and children

• US 20050250080A1
• Filed: 03/29/2005
• Published: 11/10/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 09/30/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: San Diego State University Foundation
• Original Assignee: San Diego State University Foundation
• Inventors: Friend, Margaret
• Application Number:
  US11/093,764
• Publication Number:
  US 20050250080A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/236
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/02 of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student

Abstract

The invention provides methods for assessing early language comprehension in subjects such as children, infants or learning impaired individuals, and methods for assessing problem-solving and concept development in these subjects the invention also provides articles, or computer program products, comprising a machine-readable medium including machine-executable instructions and systems to practice the methods of the invention. In one aspect, touch-responsive surfaces are used to collect responses from subjects.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a cognitive ability of a user comprising the following steps:

(a) providing a touch screen;

(b) presenting to the user a stimulus for a series of iterations;

(c) presenting at least two sensory choices for response to the stimulus of the step

(a), wherein the association of one of the choices to the stimulus is considered a correct response,

(d) receiving a response to the stimulus from the user, and

(e) determining whether the received response is correct for the stimulus by comparison of the response of the user to the stimuli to a predetermined correct response,

wherein the cognitive ability of the user is evaluated by comparison of the responses of the user to the stimuli to the predetermined correct responses;

or comprising the s of

(a) Resenting to the user a stimulus for a series of iterations;

(b) presenting at least two sensory choices for response to the stimulus of the step (a), wherein the association of one of the choices to the stimulus is considered a correct response.

(c) receiving a response to the stimulus from tee user wherein the response from the user is provided by touching a computer screen, and

(d) determining whether the received response is correct for the stimulus by comparison of the user to the stimuli to a predetermined correct response

wherein the cognitive ability of the user is evaluated by comparison of the responses of the user to the stimuli to the predetermined correct responses.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising recording a correct response for the stimulus by coding as “

1”

in an output file and recording an incorrect response for the stimulus by coding as “

0”

in an output file.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising acknowledging receipt of the correct response for the stimulus by presenting to the user a verification representation

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising acknowledging receipt of the subsequent correct responses for the stimulus after the initial incorrect response by presenting to the user a verification representation, wherein subsequent correct responses for the stimulus after the initial incorrect response are not recorded.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cognitive ability comprises a language comprehension.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the language comprehension comprises a preverbal language comprehension.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the cognitive ability comprises problem solving or concept development ability.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the user is a normally developing child.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the normally developing child is at the preverbal stage of development.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the user is developmentally delayed, motor-impaired or cognitively impaired

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the stimulus is an auditory signal, a visual signal or a combination thereof.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the choice for response from the user is easy, moderate, or difficult.

21. The method of claim 1, further comprising varying the choices for response by the user based on a cognitive ability evaluation.

22. The method of claim 1, wherein a correct response by the user produces a reinforcing signal.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the reinforcing signal is auditory or visual.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein an incorrect response by the user does not produce a reinforcing signal, or, a subsequent correct response produces a reinforcing signal, or a subsequent correct response produces a reinforcing signal, or the choices for response are presented to the user for a limited period of time.

2. (canceled)

13. The method of claim 13, wherein the choice for response from the user is presented as a single image, as pairs of images, as three images or as at least four or more images.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the images are static, are animated, are videoclips, are cartoons, comprise digital photographs, comprise colored images or a combination thereof.

15-19. -19. (canceled)

25-26. -26. (canceled)

27. A computer-implemented method for evaluating a cognitive ability of a user comprising the following steps

(a) presenting to the user a stimulus for a series of iterations;

(b) presenting to the user at least two sensory choices for response to the stimulus of the step (a), wherein the association of one of the choices to the stimulus is considered a correct response,

(c) receiving a response to the stimulus from the user, wherein the user provides a response by touching a computer screen, and

(d) determining whether the received response is correct for the stimulus by comparison of the response of the user to the stimuli to a database storing predetermined correct responses, wherein the cognitive ability of the user is evaluated by comparison of the responses of the user to the stimuli to a predetermined correct response and the evaluation is displayed to a user interface or is stored in a database.

28. The method of claim 27 further comprising recording correct responses for the stimulus by coding them as “

1”

in an output file and acknowledging receipt of a correct response for the stimulus to the user by presenting a verification representation.

29. The method of claim 27 further comprising recording incorrect responses for the stimulus by coding them as “

0”

in the output file and acknowledging receipt of subsequent correct responses for the stimulus after the initial incorrect response by presenting to the user a verification representation.

30. An article comprising a machine-readable medium including machine-executable instructions, the instructions being operative to cause a machine to:

(a) present to a user a stimulus;

(b) present to the user at least two sensory choices for response to the stimulus of the step (a), wherein the association of one of the choices to the stimulus is considered a correct response,

(c) receive a response to the stimulus from the user, wherein the user provides a response by touching a computer screen, and

(d) determine whether the received response is correct for the stimulus by comparison of the response of the user to the stimuli to a database storing predetermined correct response, wherein a cognitive ability of the user is evaluated by comparison of the responses of the user to the stimuli to a predetermined correct response and the evaluation is displayed to a user interface or is stored in a database,

31. A computer system comprising:

(a) an article as set fort in claim 30;

(b) a database having predetermined correct responses to stimuli; and

(c) a user interface allowing a user to view the results of the evaluation of the cognitive ability.