Facilitating the serving of ads having different treatments and/or characteristics, such as text ads and image ads

• US 20050251444A1
• Filed: 05/10/2004
• Published: 11/10/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 05/10/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Inventors: Jindal, Deepak, Ranganath, Rama, Patel, Amit, Chan, Wesley, Varian, Hal
• Application Number:
  US10/842,643
• Publication Number:
  US 20050251444A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/14.460
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0247 Calculate past, present or future revenues
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0263 based upon Internet or website rating

Abstract

The serving of ads of different ad types, such as text ads and image ads, competing to be rendered on an ad area of a document may be arbitrated by (a) determining candidate ads to serve in response to an ad request, wherein the candidate ads include at least one ad of a first ad type and at least one ad of a second ad type, (b) determining a score of each of at least some of the candidate ads, (c) comparing alternative sets of the at least some of the candidate ads to select a set that best meets at least one policy goal, and (d) serving the selected set of candidate ads. Performance parameter values of ads of one type, such as image ads for example, may be estimated from performance parameter values of ads of a second type, such as text ads for example.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

a) determining candidate ads to serve in response to an ad request, wherein the candidate ads include at least one ad of a first ad type and at least one ad of a second ad type;

b) determining a score of each of at least some of the candidate ads;

c) comparing alternative sets of the at least some of the candidate ads to select a set that best meets at least one policy goal; and

d) serving the selected set of candidate ads.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first ad type is a text ad and the second ad type is an image ad.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the selected set of candidate ads is to be rendered on an ad area of a document, and

wherein ads of the first ad type occupy less ad area than ads of the second ad type.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein M ads of the first ad type can fit into an area occupied by N ads of the second ad type, and

wherein M>

N.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one policy goal includes maximizing a potential estimated revenue associated with a set of ads to be served.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein each of the ads have an associated offer per user action and a user action rate.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the estimated revenue associated with a set of ads includes a sum of potential estimated revenue for each ad of the set, and

wherein the potential estimated revenue for each ad includes a product of the offer per user action associated with the ad and the user action rate associated with the ad.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein the user action rate for ads of the second type is determined using the user action rate for ads of the first type.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the user action rate for ads of the second type is determined using a product of the user action rate for ads of the first type and an adjustment factor.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the adjustment factor is a ratio of an average user action rate for all ads of the second type to an average user action rate of all ads of the first type.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein the adjustment factor is a ratio of an average user action rate for a collection of ads of the second type to an average user action rate of a corresponding collection of ads of the first type.

12. The method of claim 9 wherein the adjustment factor is a ratio of a user action rate for an ad of the second type to a user action rate of a corresponding ad of the first type.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the ad of the second type and the corresponding ad of the first type belong to the same ad group of the same ad campaign.

14. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

e) determining a discounted cost for at least one ad of the selected set of candidate ads using information from a set of candidate ads that meets the at least one policy goal second best.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected set of candidate ads includes at least N image ads which displace at least M text ads in a non-selected set of candidate ads, wherein N is at least 1, wherein M>

N, and wherein a potential expected revenue for serving the N image ads is greater than an expected potential revenue for serving the M text ads.

16. The method of claim 15 further comprising:

e) determining a discounted cost for the at least N image ads using information from the non-selected set of candidate ads.

17. The method of claim 16 further comprising:

f) adjusting the discounted cost using a difference between the expected value of the N image ads and the expected value of the M text ads.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein the selected set of candidate ads includes at least M text ads which displace at least N image ads in a non-selected set of candidate ads, wherein N is at least 1, wherein M>

N, and wherein a potential expected revenue for serving the M text ads is greater than a potential expected revenue for serving the N image ads.

20. The method of claim 19 further comprising:

e) determining a cost for the at least M text ads using information from the non-selected set of candidate ads.

21. The method of claim 20 further comprising:

f) adjusting the discounted cost using a difference between the expected value of the M text ads and the expected value of the N image ads.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein the act of adjusting distributes the difference across the at least M text ads.

18. The method of claim 18 wherein the act of adjusting distributes the difference across the at least N image ads.

40. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the means for adjusting distribute the difference across the at least N image ads.

23. Apparatus comprising:

a) means for determining candidate ads to serve in response to an ad request, wherein the candidate ads include at least one ad of a first ad type and at least one ad of a second ad type;

b) means for determining a score of each of at least some of the candidate ads;

c) means for comparing alternative sets of the at least some of the candidate ads to select a set that best meets at least one policy goal; and

d) means for serving the selected set of candidate ads.

24. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the first ad type is a text ad and the second ad type is an image ad.

25. The apparatus of claim 24 wherein the selected set of candidate ads is to be rendered on an ad area of a document, and

wherein ads of the first ad type occupy less ad area than ads of the second ad type.

26. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein M ads of the first ad type can fit into an area occupied by N ads of the second ad type, and

wherein M>

N.

27. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the at least one policy goal includes maximizing a potential estimated revenue associated with a set of ads to be served.

28. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein each of the ads have an associated offer per user action and a user action rate.

29. The apparatus of claim 28 wherein the estimated revenue associated with a set of ads includes a sum of potential estimated revenue for each ad of the set, and

wherein the potential estimated revenue for each ad includes a product of the offer per user action associated with the ad and the user action rate associated with the ad.

30. The apparatus of claim 28 further comprising means for determining the user action rate for ads of the second type using the user action rate for ads of the first type.

31. The apparatus of claim 30 wherein the means for determining the user action rate for ads of the second type use a product of the user action rate for ads of the first type and an adjustment factor.

32. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the adjustment factor is a ratio of an average user action rate for all ads of the second type to an average user action rate of all ads of the first type.

33. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the adjustment factor is a ratio of an average user action rate for a collection of ads of the second type to an average user action rate of a corresponding collection of ads of the first type.

34. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the adjustment factor is a ratio of a user action rate for an ad of the second type to a user action rate of a corresponding ad of the first type.

35. The apparatus of claim 34 wherein the ad of the second type and the corresponding ad of the first type belong to the same ad group of the same ad campaign.

36. The apparatus of claim 23 further comprising:

e) means for determining a discounted cost for at least one ad of the selected set of candidate ads using information from a set of candidate ads that meets the at least one policy goal second best.

37. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the selected set of candidate ads includes at least N image ads which displace at least M text ads in a non-selected set of candidate ads, wherein N is at least 1, wherein M>

N, and wherein a potential expected revenue for serving the N image ads is greater than an expected potential revenue for serving the M text ads.

38. The apparatus of claim 37 further comprising:

e) means for determining a discounted cost for the at least N image ads using information from the non-selected set of candidate ads.

39. The apparatus of claim 38 further comprising:

f) means for adjusting the discounted cost using a difference between the expected value of the N image ads and the expected value of the M text ads.

41. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the selected set of candidate ads includes at least M text ads which displace at least N image ads in a non-selected set of candidate ads, wherein N is at least 1, wherein M>

N, and wherein a potential expected revenue for serving the M text ads is greater than a potential expected revenue for serving the N image ads.

42. The apparatus of claim 41 further comprising:

e) means for determining a cost for the at least M text ads using information from the non-selected set of candidate ads.

43. The apparatus of claim 42 further comprising:

f) means for adjusting the discounted cost using a difference between the expected value of the M text ads and the expected value of the N image ads.

44. The apparatus of claim 43 wherein the means for adjusting distribute the difference across the at least M text ads.

45. A computer readable medium having stored thereon a computer readable message, the message comprising:

a) a request for at least one ad to be served with a document; and

b) document owner restrictions relating to a type of ad,

wherein types of ads include a text only ad, an image ad, an animation ad, a video ad, an interactive ad, and an audio ad.