Method and apparatus for valuing property

• US 20050288942A1
• Filed: 06/25/2004
• Published: 12/29/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 06/25/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: First American CoreLogic Incorporated (CoreLogic Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC (CoreLogic Incorporated)
• Inventors: Walker, Robert, Helbert, Carrie, Graboske, Benjamin
• Application Number:
  US10/876,421
• Publication Number:
  US 20050288942A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0278 Product appraisal
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03

Abstract

A method of obtaining valuations of property using multiple automated valuation models to receive the most accurate possible valuation quickly and at the lowest possible cost. An automated decision engine evaluates the accuracy and confidence score of the valuations given by various automated valuation models in a preselected order based upon their ability to provide accurate valuations in a particular geographic region. Additionally, the automated decision engine will provide a response to an individual'"'"'s loan request to purchase property based on the relevant criteria and the accurate valuation it receives as a result of this method.

Claims

1. A method of utilizing multiple automated valuation models to value a property comprising the steps of:

requesting a valuation from an automated decision engine;

selecting the automated valuation model from which to request the valuation based upon a predetermined priority;

requesting said valuation from said automated valuation model;

receiving said valuation from said automated valuation model;

evaluating said valuation received from said automated valuation model;

repeating said steps of selecting and requesting from an alternative automated valuation model if said valuation is not acceptable based upon a predetermined criteria; and

returning a response from said automated decision engine based upon said predetermined criteria.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined criteria is a minimum valuation before the issuance of a loan.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a minimum confidence score.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined priority is a predetermined ordering of said automated valuation models in a given geographic region.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined priority is a predetermined ordering of said automated valuation models in a given price range.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined priority is an arbitrary ordering of said automated valuation models in a given geographic region.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined priority is an arbitrary ordering of said automated valuation models in a given price range.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the receiving step further includes the receiving of a confidence score as to the accuracy of said valuation.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a certain confidence score or above.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a certain confidence score or above determined based upon the automated valuation model from which said valuation is requested.

11. The method of claim 2, wherein said predetermined priority is a predetermined ordering of said automated valuation models in a given geographic region.

12. The method of claim 2, wherein said predetermined priority is a predetermined ordering of said automated valuation models in a given price range.

13. The method of claim 3, wherein said predetermined priority is a predetermined ordering of said automated valuation models in a given geographic region.

14. The method of claim 3, wherein said predetermined priority is a predetermined ordering of said automated valuation models in a given price range.

15. The method of claim 4, wherein said predetermined criteria is a minimum valuation before the issuance of a loan.

16. The method of claim 4, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a minimum confidence score.

17. The method of claim 5, wherein said predetermined criteria is a minimum valuation before the issuance of a loan.

18. The method of claim 5, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a minimum confidence score.

19. The method of claim 6, wherein said predetermined criteria is a minimum valuation before the issuance of a loan.

20. The method of claim 6, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a minimum confidence score.

21. The method of claim 7, wherein said predetermined criteria is a minimum valuation before the issuance of a loan.

22. The method of claim 7, wherein said predetermined criteria is a requirement of a minimum confidence score.

23. The method of claim 8, wherein the returning step further includes the returning of a confidence score as to the accuracy of said valuation.

29. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined priority is changeable by a user and changes to said predetermined priority are logged by said automated decision engine.

30. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined priority is changeable by a user and the user who changes said predetermined priority is logged by said automated decision engine.

31. The method of claim 1 wherein said returning step further includes logging the automated valuation model used to make the decision.

32. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined criteria are changeable by a user and changes to said predetermined criteria are logged by said automated decision engine.

33. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined criteria are changeable by a user and the user who changes said predetermined criteria is logged by said automated decision engine.

34. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined priority is changeable and authentication is required to change said predetermined priority.

35. The method of claim 1 wherein said predetermined criteria is changeable and authentication is required to change said predetermined criteria.

24. A computer-based apparatus for valuing a subject property comprising:

a client system;

an automated decision engine connected to said client system comprising a decision engine, extended markup language connectors, and a monitoring and rule user interface; and

a plurality of automated valuations models connected to said automated decision engine.

25. The apparatus of claim 24 wherein said monitoring and rule user interface operates according to:

computer data-based rules of sequence; and

computer data-based rules of acceptance.

26. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein said rules of sequence and rules of acceptance are set by an authorized user.

27. The apparatus of claim 24 wherein said monitoring and rule user interface is capable of logging changes to said computer data-based rules of sequence and said computer data-based rules of acceptance by said authorized user.

28. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein said monitoring and rule user interface is capable of logging changes to said computer data-based rules of sequence and said computer data-based rules of acceptance by said authorized user.