Infrastructure-aware application development

• US 20050289502A1
• Filed: 06/29/2004
• Published: 12/29/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 06/29/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Kundu, Ashish, Nanavati, Amit Anil, Mittal, Parul A.
• Application Number:
  US10/880,124
• Publication Number:
  US 20050289502A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/100
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/10 Requirements analysis; Specification techniques

Abstract

Constraints associated with hardware upon which the application is to be deployed are determined, and parameters associated with the determined constraints are recorded for later use. Parameters may be static or dynamic in nature. Conflicts between determined constraints having incompatible parameters are resolved using a “consistent union” approach.

Claims

1. A method for developing a computer application, said method comprising:

determining constraints associated with infrastructure upon which the application is to be deployed;

recording parameters associated with the determined constraints; and

resolving any conflicts between determined constraints having incompatible parameters; and

modifying at least one component of the application based upon the recorded parameters of the determined constraints.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting possible options for the constraints.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising selecting parameters associated with determined constraints.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying whether the determined constraints have parameters that are static or dynamic.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising categorizing the determined constraints in distinct categories.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising identifying parameters that are dynamically related to determined constraints that are differently categorized.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising incorporating into the application respective Application Programming Interfaces (API) for at least one of the determined constraints.

8. A computer program comprising computer software recorded on a computer-readable medium for performing a method for developing a computer application, said method comprising:

determining constraints associated with infrastructure upon which the application is to be deployed;

recording parameters associated with the identified constraints; and

resolving any conflicts between identified constraints having incompatible parameters; and

modifying at least one component of the application based upon the recorded parameters of the identified constraints.

10. The computer program of claim 8, wherein said method further comprising presenting possible options for the constraints.

11. The computer program of claim 10, wherein said method further comprising selecting parameters associated with determined constraints.

12. The computer program of claim 8, wherein said method further comprising identifying whether the determined constraints have parameters that are static or dynamic.

13. The computer program of claim 12, wherein said method further comprising categorizing the determined constraints in distinct categories.

14. The computer program of claim 13, wherein said method further comprising identifying parameters that are dynamically related to determined constraints that are differently categorized.

15. The computer program of claim 8, wherein said method further comprising incorporating into the application respective Application Programming Interfaces (API) for at least one of the determined constraints.

9. A computer system for developing a computer application, said computer system comprising:

means for determining constraints associated with infrastructure upon which the application is to be deployed;

means for recording parameters associated with the determined constraints; and

means for resolving any conflicts between determined constraints having incompatible parameters; and

means for modifying at least one component of the application based upon the recorded parameters of the determined constraints.

16. The computer system of claim 9, further comprising:

means for presenting possible options for the constraints; and

means for selecting parameters associated with determined constraints.

17. The computer system of claim 9, further comprising means for identifying whether the determined constraints have parameters that are static or dynamic.

18. The computer system of claim 17, further comprising means for categorizing the determined constraints in distinct categories.

19. The computer system of claim 18, further comprising means for identifying parameters that are dynamically related to determined constraints that are differently categorized.

20. The computer system of claim 9, further comprising means for incorporating into the application respective Application Programming Interfaces (API) for at least one of the determined constraints.