Electrode connectivity determination system

• US 20060004295A1
• Filed: 06/28/2005
• Published: 01/05/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 06/29/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Draeger Medical Systems Incorporated (Dragerwerk AG)
• Original Assignee: Draeger Medical Systems Incorporated (Dragerwerk AG)
• Inventors: Prydekker, Randolph
• Application Number:
  US11/168,499
• Publication Number:
  US 20060004295A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/509
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/276 Protection against electrode failure
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/28 for electrocardiography [ECG]

Abstract

An electrode connectivity determination system is coupled to a plurality of patient attachable electrodes. Such a system includes a comparator for performing a comparison of a low frequency differential signal derived from at least two of the patient attachable electrodes with a predetermined threshold signal and a decision processor for generating a signal indicating an electrode signal is at least potentially degraded in response to said first comparison.

Claims

1. An electrode connectivity determination system, coupleable to a plurality of patient attachable electrodes, comprising:

a first comparator for performing a first comparison of a low frequency differential signal derived from at least two of said patient attachable electrodes with a predetermined threshold signal; and

a decision processor for generating a signal indicating an electrode signal is at least potentially degraded in response to said first comparison.

2. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a second comparator for performing a second comparison of a low frequency signal derived from one of said patient attachable electrodes with second predetermined threshold signal;

wherein;

said decision processor generates a signal indicating an electrode signal is at least potentially degraded in response to said first and said second comparisons

3. The system of claim 2 wherein said low frequency differential signal and said low frequency signal are respective substantially DC signals.

4. The system of claim 2 wherein said low frequency signal is derived by buffering and low pass filtering an electrical signal from said patient attachable electrode.

5. The system of claim 2 wherein said low frequency differential signal is derived by buffering and low pass filtering electrical signals from said at least two patient attachable electrodes.

6. The system of claim 5 wherein said low frequency differential signal is derived by analog to digital conversion of said buffered and low pass filtered electrical signals.

7. The system of claim 1 comprised in an ECG monitor wherein said decision processor generates a signal indicating an electrode signal corresponding to ECG lead signal I is at least potentially degraded in response to:

a low frequency differential signal, derived from data representing a difference between Left Arm and Right Arm patient attachable electrode signals, exceeding said first predetermined threshold signal; and

at least one of, (a) a Left Arm patient attachable electrode signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal, and (b) a Right Arm patient attachable electrode signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal.

8. The system of claim 1 comprised in an ECG monitor wherein said decision processor generates a signal indicating an electrode signal corresponding to ECG lead signal II is at least potentially degraded in response to:

a low frequency differential signal, derived from data representing a difference between Left Leg and Right Arm patient attachable electrode signals, exceeding said first predetermined threshold signal; and

at least one of, (a) a Left Leg patient attachable electrode signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal, and (b) a Right Arm patient attachable electrode signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal.

9. The system of claim 1 comprised in an ECG monitor wherein said decision processor generates a signal indicating an electrode signal corresponding to a first ECG chest lead signal V is at least potentially degraded in response to:

a low frequency differential signal, derived from data representing a difference between a First Chest patient attachable electrode signal and an averaged signal derived from Left Leg, Right Arm and Left Arm patient attachable electrode signals, exceeding said first predetermined threshold signal; and

at least one of, (a) the First Chest patient attachable electrode signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal and (b) said averaged signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal.

10. The system of claim 1 comprised in an ECG monitor wherein said decision processor generates a signal indicating an electrode signal corresponding to a second ECG chest lead signal V+ is at least potentially degraded in response to:

a low frequency differential signal, derived from data representing a difference between said Second Chest patient attachable electrode signal and an averaged signal, derived from Left Leg, Right Arm and Left Arm patient attachable electrode signals, exceeding said first predetermined threshold signal; and

at least one of, (a) the Second Chest patient attachable electrode signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal and (b) said averaged signal exceeding said second predetermined threshold signal.

11. The system of claim 1 wherein a patient attachable electrode signal is at least potentially degraded if said patient attachable electrode signal is affected by impaired electrical contact between the patient attachable electrode and a patient body.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein said impaired electrical contact occurs if at least one of, (a) said patient attachable electrode is detached from said patient body and (b) electrical resistivity between said patient attachable electrode and said patient body is significantly increased because of degraded electrical contact.

13. The system of claim 1 wherein said patient attachable electrodes are of a conventional 12 lead ECG signal set.

14. The system of claim 1 wherein said patient attachable electrodes are of a subset or reduced number of leads of a conventional 12 lead ECG signal set.

15. The system of claim 1 wherein said decision processor automatically adaptively adjusts said second predetermined threshold signal in response to said first comparison.

16. An electrode connectivity determination system, coupleable to a plurality of patient attachable electrodes, comprising:

a first comparator for performing a first comparison of a low frequency differential signal derived from at least two patient attachable electrodes with a first predetermined threshold signal;

a second comparator for performing a second comparison of a low frequency signal derived from a patient attachable electrode with a second predetermined threshold signal; and

a decision processor for generating a signal indicating an electrode signal is at least potentially degraded in response to said first and said second comparisons.

17. A system, coupleable to a plurality of patient attachable electrodes, for use in determining electrode connectivity, comprising:

a first comparator for performing a first comparison of a low frequency differential signal derived from at least two patient attachable electrodes with a first predetermined threshold signal;

a second comparator for performing a second comparison of a low frequency signal derived from a patient attachable electrode with a second predetermined threshold signal; and

a decision processor for automatically adaptively adjusting said second predetermined threshold signal in response to said first comparison.

18. A method for determining connectivity status of a plurality of patient attachable electrodes, comprising:

performing a first comparison of a low frequency differential signal derived from at least two patient attachable electrodes with a first predetermined threshold signal;

performing a second comparison of a low frequency signal derived from a patient attachable electrode with a second predetermined threshold signal; and

generating a signal indicating an electrode signal is at least potentially degraded in response to said first and said second comparison.