Method for automatically handling undesired electronic mail in communication networks at the recipient end

• US 20060010210A1
• Filed: 09/17/2003
• Published: 01/12/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 09/17/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: T-Mobile Deutschland GmbH (Deutsche Telekom AG)
• Original Assignee: T-Mobile Deutschland GmbH (Deutsche Telekom AG)
• Inventors: Keller, Walter
• Application Number:
  US10/528,284
• Publication Number:
  US 20060010210A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for automatically rejecting/avoiding undesired e-mails in mailboxes at the recipient end, according to which the address of the sender of the e-mail is compared with a recipient-specific list of authorized senders and is saved in the mailbox only if said address matches that of an authorized sender. A second, optional mailbox (junk mailbox, JMB) which is also accessible at the recipient end is provided for receiving all unauthorized messages. Optionally, automatic functions such as cyclical deletion, virus scanning, separation of stations and/or executable software, sender analysis, sending of stop requests and/or warnings, etc., can be configured in the system.

Claims

1-8. -8. (canceled)

9. A method to automatically handle undesired electronic mail (e-mail) in communication networks at the receiver, the method comprising:

automatically comparing the sender address accompanying an incoming e-mail to an electronically accessed list of authorized sender addresses assigned to the receiver;

then

storing the e-mail in a mailbox MB of the recipient, wherein the only e-mails transferred to the receiver'"'"'s mailbox are those that had clearly been sent by authorized senders; and

performing an analysis to see if there is serial, incremental user identification occurring so that conclusions can be drawn concerning automatic attempts at breaking into the e-mail system.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein there are two logically or physically, or both, separate mailboxes, said mailbox MB and a junk mailbox JMB, wherein the e-mail server sends to the JMB mailbox all incoming e-mails that indeed have the subscriber'"'"'s correct recipient address but are not contained in the sender list on the receiving side, thus making them available for further processing selectively by the internet service provider, the administrative authorities, and by the recipient.

11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the incoming e-mails are selectively put through an automatic handling and analysis process, which can be selectively configured by the recipient and by the ISP, selectively in the e-mail server, in a comparison device, and in at least one of the mailboxes, said process initiated and configured either on a case-by-case basis or permanently.

12. The method according to claim 10, wherein the incoming e-mails are selectively put through an automatic handling andanalysis process, which can be selectively configured by the recipient andr by the ISP, selectively in the e-mail server, in a comparison device, and in at least one of the mailboxes, said process initiated and configured either on a case-by-case basis or permanently.

13. The method according to claim 9, wherein all executable programs sent as attachments to e-mails are automatically separated in the JMB.

14. The method according to claim 10, wherein all executable programs sent as attachments to e-mails are automatically separated in the JMB.

15. The method according to claim 11, wherein all executable programs sent as attachments to e-mails are automatically separated in the JMB.

16. The method according to claim 12, wherein all executable programs sent as attachments to e-mails are automatically separated in the JMB.

17. The method according to claim 9, wherein if an undesired e-mail is received, discontinuation requests, or cease and desist demands, can be generated automatically and delivered to the sender.

18. The method according to claim 10, wherein if an undesired e-mail is received, discontinuation requests, or cease and desist demands, can be generated automatically and delivered to the sender.

19. The method according to claim 11, wherein if an undesired e-mail is received, discontinuation requests, or cease and desist demands, can be generated automatically and delivered to the sender.

20. The method according to claim 12, wherein if an undesired e-mail is received, discontinuation requests, or cease and desist demands, can be generated automatically and delivered to the sender.

21. The method according to claim 9, wherein virus checks of the e-mail can be carried out selectively at an established time of day or each time a message arrives.

22. The method according to claim 10, wherein virus checks of the e-mail can be carried out selectively at an established time of day or each time a message arrives.

23. The method according to claim 11, wherein virus checks of the e-mail can be carried out selectively at an established time of day or each time a message arrives.

24. The method according to claim 12, wherein virus checks of the e-mail can be carried out selectively at an established time of day or each time a message arrives

25. The method according to claim 10, wherein the contents of the JMB can be cyclically deleted at specific time intervals.

26. The method according to claim 11, wherein the contents of the JMB can be cyclically deleted at specific time intervals.

27. The method according to claim 12, wherein the contents of the JMB can be cyclically deleted at specific time intervals.

28. The method according to claim 13, wherein the contents of the JMB can be cyclically deleted at specific time intervals.