System and method for generating optimized test cases using constraints based upon system requirements

• US 20060010426A1
• Filed: 07/09/2004
• Published: 01/12/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 07/09/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Smartcare Technologies Limited
• Original Assignee: Smartcare Technologies Limited
• Inventors: Lewis, William E., Terkel, Michael
• Application Number:
  US10/887,592
• Publication Number:
  US 20060010426A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/124
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3684 for test design, e.g. generating new test cases

Abstract

The present invention provides a system, method and computer program for generating a final optimized test data set. An initial test data set, one or more data rules and one or more business rules are provided. The initial test data set is then modified using the one or more data rules. The modified test data set is optimized using an orthogonal array. The final optimized test data set is then generated by applying the one or more business rules to the optimized test data. The present invention can be implemented using a computer program embodied on a computer readable medium wherein each step is executed by one or more code segments. The system used to implement the present invention may include a data storage device, a processor and one or more input/output devices.

Claims

1. A method for generating a final optimized test data set comprising the steps of:

providing an initial test data set, one or more data rules and one or more business rules;

modifying the initial test data set using the one or more data rules;

optimizing the modified test data set using an orthogonal array;

generating the final optimized test data set by applying the one or more business rules to the optimized test data set.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the initial test data set comprises a set of parameters and values.

3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the initial test data set is derived from fields and values from a graphical user interface, parts of a network, a system configuration, one or more functional items, a functional specification or an application interface.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of determining whether the initial test data set is sufficient.

5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more data rules define the behavior of the data within the initial test data set.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more business rules define the behavior of the application or system to be tested.

7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more data rules or the one or more business rules are entered in a simple prose format.

8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the modified test data set is optimized by generating a set of pair-wise values using the orthogonal array.

9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the set of pair-wise values allow a smaller subset of test case data while providing a statistically valid means of testing all independent component state transitions.

10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the orthogonal array is a “

best fit”

orthogonal array selected from the group of orthogonal Latin squares designated L4, L9, L16, L25, L49, L64, L81, L121, L169 and L256.

11. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of setting up a standard set of orthogonal tables.

12. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of expanding the orthogonal array.

13. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising the steps of:

encrypting the expanded orthogonal array into a text file; and

decrypting the text file.

14. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of applying the one or more business rules to the optimized test data set to create a final test case data set.

15. The method as recited in claim 14, further comprising the step of creating a matrix of the final test case set versus the one or more business rules.

16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the matrix indicates whether one or more positive and one or more negative test conditions are covered by the final test case set.

17. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of storing the final test case data set in a relational database.

18. The method as recited in claim 17, further comprising the step of exporting the set of final test case data to a data file.

19. The method as recited in claim 18, further comprising the step of importing the final set of case data into an automated capture/replay testing tool.

20. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more data rules comprise one or more condition based rules or one or more iteration based rules.

21. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more business rules comprise one or more exclude statements or one or more require statements.

22. An optimized test data set generated in accordance with the method of claim 1.

23. A method for generating a final optimized test data set comprising the steps of:

providing an initial test data set;

modifying the initial test data set using a first set of constraints;

optimizing the modified test data set using an orthogonal array;

generating the final optimized test data set by applying a second set of constraints to the optimized test data set.

24. The method as recited in claim 23, wherein the first set of constraints comprise one or more data rules.

25. The method as recited in claim 24, wherein the second set of constraints comprise one or more business rules.

26. An optimized test data set generated in accordance with the method of claim 23.

27. A computer program embodied on a computer readable medium for generating a final optimized test data set comprising:

a code segment for providing an initial test data set, one or more data rules and one or more business rules;

a code segment for modifying the initial test data set using the one or more data rules;

a code segment for optimizing the modified test data set using an orthogonal array;

a code segment for generating the final optimized test data set by applying the one or more business rules to the optimized test data set.

28. A computer program for generating a final optimized test data set comprising:

a code segment for providing an initial test data set;

a code segment for modifying the initial test data set using a first set of constraints;

a code segment for optimizing the modified test data set using an orthogonal array;

a code segment for generating the final optimized test data set by applying a second set of constraints to the optimized test data set.

29. The computer program as recited in claim 28, wherein the computer program is a plug in.

30. The computer program as recited in claim 28, wherein the computer program is a part of a developer'"'"'s tool kit.

31. An system comprising:

a data storage device having an initial test data set, one or more data rules and one or more business rules stored therein;

a processor communicably coupled to the data storage device that modifies the initial test data set using the one or more data rules, optimizes the modified test data set using an orthogonal array and generates the final optimized test data set by applying the one or more business rules to the optimized test data; and

one or more input/output devices communicably coupled to the processor.