Management method, system and product for enterprise environmental programs

• US 20060015424A1
• Filed: 07/15/2004
• Published: 01/19/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 07/15/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Augusta Systems, Inc. (Hexagon AB)
• Original Assignee: Augusta Systems, Inc. (Hexagon AB)
• Inventors: Thomas, George K., Esposito, Patrick R. II, Harvey, Clint M., Williams, Jackie P. II, Esposito, Patrick R. Sr., Esposito, Michelle Varga, Gandee, Jesse E., Wood, Janet M., Locke, C. David
• Application Number:
  US10/891,725
• Publication Number:
  US 20060015424A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/845 Inventory and reporting systems for greenhouse gases [GHG]

Abstract

To provide for management of enterprise environmental programs, the invention is a method, system, and computer program product that performs functions for emissions cataloging, assessing, analyzing, comparing, strategic planning, reporting and viewing. The invention further provides an integrated, modular mechanism with dynamic data promulgation for making strategic performance assessments and investment decisions. The invention uses a plurality of databases and datastores for storing, tracking, analyzing and comparing emissions information, emissions management activity information, market information, regulatory and voluntary compliance information, risk management information, as well as financial, legal, and production information, at an entity, facility, process, and other enterprise levels. The invention further includes a user interactive feature that provides a means for the user of the invention to enter data and receive an analyzed and compared data output display from a central client server.

Claims

1. ) A computerized method for managing enterprise environmental programs, said method comprised of the steps of:

a) entering into a computerized system data sets of enterprise ownership relationships and of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

,

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein the step of analyzing the data sets includes the attribution of environmental emissions data to multiple entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

2. ) The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the data sets include projections of future enterprise ownership relationships.

3. ) The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the step of analyzing the data includes the determination of projections of future emissions and attribution of said future emissions to multiple entities within the enterprise hierarchy.

4. ) The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the data sets include time periods of varying duration.

5. ) The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the data sets include financial information.

6. ) The computerized method of claim 1, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

7. ) The computerized method of claim 6, wherein the comparisons generated include multiple concurrent and independent environmental program goals.

25. ) The computerized method of claims 1, 8, 12 or 17, wherein the data sets include emissions trading market data and projected emissions trading market data.

28. ) The computerized method of claim 25, wherein the comparisons generated include the value of emissions reduction units for a selected set of environmentally related activities.

29. ) The computerized method of claim 28, wherein the value of projected emissions reduction units are adjusted for risk.

30. ) The computerized method of claim 28, wherein the value of projected emissions reduction units are discounted.

31. ) The computerized method of claim 28, wherein the value of actual emissions reduction units are adjusted for the time value of money.

32. ) The computerized method of claims 1, 8, 12 or 17, wherein the data sets are normalized.

33. ) The computerized method of claim 32, wherein the comparisons generated and the visual output provided are normalized.

8. ) A computerized method for managing enterprise environmental programs, said method comprised of the steps of:

a) entering into a computerized system data sets of enterprise ownership relationships and of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

,

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein, the data sets entered into the computerized data base include time periods of varying duration.

9. ) The computerized method of claim 8, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

10. ) The computerized method of claim 8, wherein the data sets include financial information.

11. ) The computerized method of claim 8, wherein the steps of analysis and generating comparisons include multiple entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

12. ) A computerized method for managing enterprise environmental programs, said method comprised of the steps of:

a) entering into a computerized system data sets of enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, and of environmental program goals, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein the comparisons include concurrent comparisons of one or more emissions against multiple environmental program goals.

13. ) The computerized method of claim 12, wherein said comparisons of emissions against multiple environmental program goals are based on historical emissions.

14. ) The computerized method of claim 12, wherein said generated comparisons of environmental emissions against multiple environmental program goals include projections of future environmental emissions estimates.

15. ) The computerized method of claim 12, wherein the generated comparisons of environmental emissions against multiple environmental program goals are attributed to entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

16. ) The computerized method of claim 12, wherein the data sets include financial information.

17. ) A computerized method for managing enterprise environmental programs, said method comprised of the steps of:

a) entering into a computerized system data sets of enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, and of financial information, including information on environmentally related activities, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons.

18. ) The computerized method of claim 17, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

19. ) The computerized method of claim 17, wherein financial feasibility metrics for environmentally-related activities are determined.

20. ) The computerized method of claim 19, wherein the financial feasibility metrics are discounted to present value.

21. ) The computerized method of claim 19, wherein the financial feasibility metrics are adjusted for the time value of money.

22. ) The computerized method of claim 19, wherein the financial feasibility metrics include merits of worth.

23. ) The computerized method of claim 17, wherein the data sets include risk factors and wherein risk-adjusted financial feasibility metrics for environmentally-related activities are determined.

24. ) The computerized method of claim 17, where the comparisons generated include the cost and revenue projections of an environmentally related activity.

26. ) The computerized method of claim 17 or claim 22, wherein the steps of analysis and generating comparisons use emissions trading market data and emissions trading market projections data.

27. ) The computerized method of claim 26, wherein the comparisons generated include the value of emissions reduction units for a selected set of environmentally related activities.

34. ) A computerized method for managing enterprise environmental programs, said method comprised of the steps of:

a) entering into a computerized system data sets of enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, and of financial information, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein the data sets include data on historic or projected environmentally-related activity transactions, including actual or projected, respectively, emissions reduction units.

35. ) The computerized method of claim 34, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

36. ) The computerized method of claim 34, wherein the step of analysis determines the cost and revenue values for historic or projected environmentally related transactions.

37. ) The computerized method of claim 36, wherein the cost and revenue values for historic environmentally related transactions are adjusted for the time value of money.

38. ) The computerized method of claim 36, wherein the cost and revenue values for projected environmentally related transactions are discounted or are adjusted for risk.

39. ) The computerized method of claim 34, wherein the comparisons generated include the financial values of a plurality of scenarios of acquisition and divestiture of environmentally-related activities.

40. ) The computerized method of claim 39, wherein the financial values of the scenarios based on projected emissions reduction units are discounted or are adjusted for risk.

41. ) The computerized method of claim 39, wherein the financial values of the scenarios based on actual emission reduction units are adjusted for the time value of money.

42. ) A system for managing enterprise environmental programs, said system comprising the steps:

a) input means for entry of data sets into a computer storage device, said data sets including data on enterprise ownership relationships and of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, for one or more time periods;

b) analysis means, for analyzing said data sets;

c) comparison means, for generating comparisons between the data sets;

d) output means, for generating visual outputs of the results of the comparison means;

wherein the analysis means includes means for attributing environmental emissions data to multiple entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

43. ) The system of claim 42, wherein the data sets entered by the input means include projections of future enterprise ownership relationships.

44. ) The system of claim 42, wherein the analysis means is comprised of means for determining projections of future emissions and attributing said future emissions to multiple entities within the enterprise hierarchy.

45. ) The system of claim 42, wherein the data sets entered by the input means include time periods of varying durations.

46. ) The system of claim 42, wherein the data sets include financial information.

47. ) The system of claim 42, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

48. ) The system of claim 47, wherein the comparison means is comprised of means to generate comparisons with multiple concurrent and independent environmental program goals.

65. ) The system of claims 42, 49, 53 or 57, wherein the data sets entered by the input means include emissions trading market data and emissions trading market projections data.

68. ) The system of claim 65, wherein the comparisons generated by the comparison means include the value of actual or projected emissions reduction units for a selected set of environmentally-related activities.

69. ) The system of claim 68, wherein the value of projected emissions reduction units are adjusted for risk.

70. ) The system of claim 68, wherein the value of projected emissions reduction units are discounted.

71. ) The system of claim 68, wherein the value of actual emissions reduction units are adjusted for the time value of money.

72. ) The system of claims 42, 49, 53 or 57, wherein the analysis means normalizes the data sets.

73. ) The system of claim 72, wherein the comparisons generated and the visual output provided are normalized.

49. ) A system for managing enterprise environmental programs, said system comprising the steps:

a) input means for entry of data sets into a computer storage device, said data sets including data on enterprise ownership relationships and of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, for one or more time periods;

b) analysis means, for analyzing said data sets;

c) comparison means, for generating comparisons between the data sets; and

,

d) output means, for generating visual outputs of the results of the comparison means;

wherein the data sets entered by the input means is comprised of time periods of varying durations.

50. ) The system of claim 49, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

51. ) The system of claim 49, wherein the data sets include financial information.

52. ) The system of claim 49, wherein the analysis means and the comparison means attribute their results to multiple entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

53. ) A system for managing enterprise environmental programs, said system comprising the steps:

a) input means for entry of data sets into a computer storage device, said data sets including data on enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise and of environmental program goals, for one or more time periods;

b) analysis means, for analyzing said data sets;

c) comparison means, for generating comparisons between the data sets; and

,

d) output means, for generating visual outputs of the results of the comparison means;

wherein the comparison means is comprised of means for generating comparisons of one or more environmental emissions concurrently against multiple environmental program goals.

54. ) The system of claim 53, wherein the comparison means for generating comparisons concurrently against multiple environmental program goals is based on historical environmental emissions.

55. ) The system of claim 53, wherein the comparison means for generating comparisons concurrently against multiple environmental program goals includes projected future environmental emissions.

56. ) The system of claim 53, wherein the comparisons generated by the comparison means are attributed to entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

57. ) A system for managing enterprise environmental programs, said system comprising the steps:

a) input means for entry of data sets into a computer storage device, said data sets including data on enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise and of financial information, including information on environmental activities, for one or more time periods;

b) analysis means, for analyzing said data sets;

c) comparison means, for generating comparisons between the data sets; and

,

d) output means, for generating visual outputs of the results of the comparison means.

58. ) The system of claim 57, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

59. ) The system of claim 57, wherein the analysis means is comprised of means for determining financial feasibility metrics for environmentally-related activities.

60. ) The system of claim 59, wherein the determined financial feasibility metrics are discounted to present value.

61. ) The system of claim 59, wherein the determined financial feasibility metrics are adjusted for the time value of money.

62. ) The system of claim 59, wherein the determined financial feasibility metrics include merits of worth.

63. ) The system of claim 57, wherein the data sets entered by the input means include risk factors and wherein the analysis means is comprised of means for determining risk adjusted financial feasibility metrics for environmentally-related activities.

64. ) The system of claim 57, wherein the comparisons generated by the comparison means include the cost and revenue projections of an environmentally-related activity.

66. ) The system of claims 57 or 62, wherein analysis means and the comparison means use emissions trading market data and emissions trading market data projections.

67. ) The system of claim 66, wherein the comparisons generated by the comparison means include the value of emissions reduction units for a selected set of environmentally-related activities.

74. ) A system for managing enterprise environmental programs, said system comprising the steps:

a) input means for entry of data sets into a computer storage device, said data sets including data on enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, and of financial information, for one or more time periods;

b) analysis means, for analyzing said data sets;

c) comparison means, for generating comparisons between the data sets; and

,

d) output means, for generating visual outputs of the results of the comparison means;

wherein the data sets are comprised of data on historic or projected environmentally-related activity transactions, including actual or projected, respectively, emissions reduction units.

75. ) The system of claim 74, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

76. ) The system of claim 74, wherein the analysis means determines the cost and revenue values for historic or projected environmentally-related activity transactions.

77. ) The system of claim 76, wherein the cost and revenue values for historic environmentally-related activity transactions are adjusted for the time value of money.

78. ) The system of claim 76, wherein the cost and revenue values for projected environmentally-related activity transactions are discounted or adjusted for risk.

79. ) The system of claim 74, wherein the comparisons generated include the financial values of a plurality of scenarios of acquisition and divestiture of environmentally-related activities.

80. ) The system of claim 79, wherein the financial values of the scenarios based on projected emissions reduction units are discounted or adjusted for risk.

81. ) The system of claim 79, wherein the financial values of the scenarios based on actual emissions reduction units are adjusted for the time value of money.

82. ) A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing a method comprising:

a) entering into a computerized database data sets of enterprise ownership relationships and of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein the analysis of the data sets includes the attribution of environmental emissions data to multiple entities with a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

83. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the data sets entered into the computerized data base include projections of future enterprise ownership relationships.

84. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the analysis of the data sets caused by the computer-executable instructions includes the determination of projections of future emissions and attribution of said future emissions to multiple entities within the enterprise hierarchy.

85. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the data sets entered into the computerized data base include time periods of varying durations.

86. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the data sets include financial information.

87. ) The computer-readable method of claim 82, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

88. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 82, wherein the comparisons caused by the computer-executable instructions include multiple concurrent and independent environmental program goals.

105. ) The computer-readable medium of claims 82, 89, 93 or 97, wherein the data sets entered into the computerized database include emissions trading market data and projected emission trading market data.

108. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 105, wherein the comparisons generated include the value of emissions reduction units for a selected set of environmentally-related activities.

109. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 108, wherein the value of projected emissions reduction units are adjusted for risk.

110. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 108, wherein the value of projected emissions reduction units are discounted.

111. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 108, wherein the value of actual emissions reduction units are adjusted for the time value of money.

112. ) The computer-readable medium of claims 82, 89, 93 or 97, wherein the data sets are normalized.

113. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 112, wherein the comparisons generated and the visual output provided are normalized.

89. ) A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing a method comprising:

a) entering into a computerized database data sets of enterprise ownership relationships and of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

,

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein, the data sets entered into the computerized database include time periods of varying duration.

90. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 89, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

91. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 89, wherein the data sets include financial information.

92. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 89, wherein the analysis and generation of comparisons caused by the computer-executable instructions include multiple entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

93. ) A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing a method comprising:

a) entering into a computerized database data sets of enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise and of environmental program goals, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

,

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein the generation of comparisons caused by the computer-executable instructions include concurrent comparisons of one or more emissions against multiple environmental program goals.

94. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 93, wherein the comparisons generated by the computer-executable instructions of emissions against multiple environmental program goals are based on historical emissions.

95. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 93, wherein the comparisons generated by the computer-executable instructions of emissions against multiple environmental program goals are based on projected future emissions estimates.

96. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 93, wherein the comparisons generated by the computer-executable instructions of emissions against multiple environmental program goals are attributed to entities within a multi-layered enterprise hierarchy.

97. ) A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing a method comprising:

a) entering into a computerized database data sets of enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, and of financial information, including financial information on environmentally-related activities, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

,

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons.

98. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 97, wherein the data sets include environmental program goals.

99. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 97, wherein analyzing the data sets includes determining financial feasibility metrics for environmentally-related activities.

100. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 99, wherein the determined financial feasibility metrics are discounted to present value.

101. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 99, wherein the determined financial feasibility metrics are adjusted for the time value of money.

102. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 99, wherein the determined financial feasibility metrics include merits of worth.

103. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 97, wherein the data sets entered into the computerized database include risk factors, and wherein analyzing the data sets includes determining risk-adjusted financial feasibility metrics for environmentally-related activities.

104. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 97, wherein the comparisons generated include the cost and revenue projections of environmentally-related activities.

106. ) The computer-readable medium of claims 97 or 102, wherein analyzing the data sets and generating comparisons use emissions trading market data and projected emissions trading market data.

107. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 106, wherein the comparisons generated include the value of emissions reduction units for a selected set of environmentally-related activities.

114. ) A computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing a method comprising:

a) entering into a computerized database data sets of enterprise ownership relationships, of environmental emissions information from entities within the enterprise, of environmental program goals, and of financial information, for one or more time periods;

b) analyzing said data sets;

c) generating comparisons among said data sets; and

,

d) providing a visual output of said comparisons;

wherein the data sets entered into the computer database include data on historic or projected environmentally-related activity transactions, including actual or projected, respectively, emissions reduction units.

115. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 114, wherein analyzing the data sets includes determining the cost and revenue values for historic and projected environmentally-related activity transactions, including actual or projected, respectively, emissions reduction units.

116. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 115, wherein the cost and revenue values of historic environmentally-related activity transactions are adjusted for the time value of money.

117. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 115, wherein the cost and revenue values for projected environmentally related activities are discounted or are adjusted for risk.

118. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 114, wherein the comparisons generated include the financial values of a plurality of scenarios of acquisitions and divestiture of environmentally-related activities.

119. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 118, wherein the values of the projected emissions reduction units are discounted or are adjusted for risk.

120. ) The computer-readable medium of claim 118, wherein the values of the actual emissions reduction units are adjusted for the time value of money.