Biometric authentication system

• US 20060021003A1
• Filed: 06/23/2005
• Published: 01/26/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 06/23/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Janus Software Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Janus Software Incorporated
• Inventors: Fisher, Adam G., Fisher, Patricia A.P., Kopcha, Scott D., Cockrell, Bryan J., Lane, Matthew J.
• Application Number:
  US11/159,884
• Publication Number:
  US 20060021003A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/32 using biometric data, e.g. fingerprints, iris scans or voiceprints
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 9/37 using biometric data, e.g. fingerprints, iris scans or voice recognition
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/0861 using biometrical features, e.g. fingerprint, retina-scan cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication using biological data H04L9/3231

Abstract

A full-featured authentication framework is provided that allows for the dynamic selection of authentication modalities based on need and/or environment. The framework comprises a server responsible for handling requests for data and services from the other components, a logon module, a user administration tool and a system administration tool. The authentication framework may be used in a multi-biometric environment or one that contains a combination of any other authentication techniques. The system is built on a BioAPI framework and uses common data security architecture. A primary feature of the system of the present invention is the facilitation of the installation of authentication modalities, possibly from numerous vendors, thereby allowing for plug-and-play of new biometric functionality and additional core data security modules with no extra programming effort.

Claims

1. A full-featured authentication system comprising one or more methods of authentication and means for determining authentication policies based dynamically upon need and/or environment for both physical and logical access.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein said determination is based upon the authentication methods installed and the level of security access required by the user.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein said authentication methods are chosen from the group consisting of passwords, tokens and biometrics.

4. A full-featured authentication system that allows for expansion of the system with minimal interaction from the end user and the administrators of the system, said system comprising one or more methods of authentication and means for installing new authentication methods based upon a user'"'"'s want and need from remote locations on demand.

5. The authentication system of claim 4, further including means to integrate physical and logical access thereto using a single security policy.

6. The authentication system of claim 5, further including means to manage said policy through a sole interface for a multiple user system.

7. The authentication system of claim 6, further including means to facilitate the integration of new authentication methods as they are created and refined.

8. The authentication system of claim 4, wherein said methods for authentication and means for installing are controlled by a single-click interface.

9. A method for authenticating multiple users in a network environment, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a full-featured authentication system comprising at least one method of authentication; and

determining authentication policies based dynamically upon need and/or environment for physical and logical access to said network environment.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein said at least one method of authentication is chosen from the group consisting of passwords, tokens and biometrics.

11. The method of claim 9, further including the steps of:

creating an authentication policy, wherein said authentication policy comprises at least one authentication method required for user verification;

creating an environmental policy, wherein said environmental policy comprises a credential set recommended for user verification;

creating system default policies;

communicating said policies to an authentication controller;

creating optimal set authentication modules required for successful authentication;

combinining said policies to create an optimal authentication set

identifying said user; and

authenticating said user using said optimal authentication set.

12. The method of claim 11, further including the step of dynamically installing new authentication methods.