Method and system for electronically processing project requests

• US 20060031078A1
• Filed: 08/04/2004
• Published: 02/09/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 08/04/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Barbara Pizzinger, Frank Cirisano, Joan Reilly, Louann Levine, Susan Kay White
• Original Assignee: Barbara Pizzinger, Frank Cirisano, Joan Reilly, Louann Levine, Susan Kay White
• Inventors: Levine, Louann, Cirisano, Frank, White, Susan Kay, Reilly, Joan, Pizzinger, Barbara
• Application Number:
  US10/910,844
• Publication Number:
  US 20060031078A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06313 Resource planning in a project environment

Abstract

A method and system are provided for handling electronic project requests, and more specifically to a system and method for electronically receiving, evaluating and processing project requests, and for monitoring the progress of developing requested projects through implementation. The system and method are directed to the submission and electronic processing of project requests, including: initiating a system request; directing the request to the appropriate business for review; generating cost and estimates for the requested project; generating preliminary start and end dates for the project; classifying the project based upon its size (cost expectations); acquiring funding for the project; and monitoring the project toward completion.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a request to process a project, wherein the request includes information relating to processing the project, the method comprising:

receiving a score relating to a level of detail included in the request;

determining, by a processor, a project-related date based, at least in part, upon the score.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether the score indicates that the level of detail exceeds a predetermined level; and

initiating the processing of the project if the score indicates that the level of detail exceeds the predetermined level.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining whether the score indicates that the level of detail exceeds a predetermined level; and

initiating a discovery process if the predetermined level is exceeded, wherein the discovery process relates to gathering additional information relating to the processing of the project for determining a subsequent score.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the project-related date is a target completion date of the project.

5. A method for categorizing a project defined by a project request, the method comprising:

receiving a first value associated with processing a project request;

receiving a second value associated with determining the first value;

calculating, by a processor, a total processing value for completing the project request, wherein the total processing value is based, at least in part, upon the first value and the second value; and

categorizing, by the processor, the project request based, at least in part, upon the total processing value.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein:

the first value relates to an amount of time for processing the project; and

the second value relates to an amount of time for determining the first value.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein:

the first value relates to a cost for processing the project; and

the second value relates to a cost for determining the first value.

8. The method of claim 5, further comprising:

generating an authorization request for the processing of the project, if the categorizing of the project request meets a predetermined rule.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the predetermined rule relates to whether the total processing value is greater than a predetermined threshold.

10. The method of claim 10, wherein the predetermined threshold relates to an amount of time to process the project request and determining the first value.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the predetermined threshold relates to a cost for processing the project request and determining the first value.

12. A method for monitoring the processing of a project, wherein the project is defined by a project request, the method comprising:

receiving a first value associated with processing the project request;

receiving a second value associated with determining the first value;

comparing, by a processor, the second value with an estimated sizing value, wherein the estimated sizing value relates to an estimated value for determining the first value; and

storing comparison information, wherein the comparison information is based, at least in part, upon comparing the estimated sizing value with the second value.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising:

receiving a project request;

determining an amount of time that transpires between receiving the project request and receiving the first value; and

wherein the second value relates to the amount of time for determining the first value, and the estimated sizing value relates to an estimated amount of time for determining the first value.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising:

generating a report, wherein the report is based, at least in part, upon the comparison information.

15. A method for monitoring the processing of a project, wherein the project is defined by a project request, the method comprising:

receiving a first value associated with processing a project;

comparing, by a processor, the first value with an estimated processing value, wherein the estimated processing value relates to an estimated value for processing the project request; and

storing comparison information, wherein the comparison information is based upon the comparing of the estimated processing value with the first value.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

generating a report based, at least in part, upon the comparison information.

17. A system for evaluating a request to process a project, wherein the request includes information relating to processing the project, the system comprising:

an interface to receive a score relating to a level of detail included in the request; and

a processor programmed to determine a project-related date based, at least in part, upon the score.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the processor is further programmed to:

determine whether the score indicates that the level of detail exceeds a predetermined level; and

initiate the processing of the project if the score indicates that the level of detail exceeds the predetermined level.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein the processor is further programmed to:

determine whether the score indicates that the level of detail exceeds a predetermined level; and

initiate a discovery process if the predetermined level is exceeded, wherein the discovery process relates to gathering additional information relating to the processing of the project for determining a subsequent score.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein the project-related date is a target completion date of the project.

21. A system for categorizing a project defined by a project request, the system comprising:

an interface to receive a first value associated with processing a project request, and to receive a second value associated with determining the first value; and

a processor programmed to calculate a total processing value for completing the project request, wherein the total processing value is based, at least in part, upon the first value and the second value, and to categorize the project request based, at least in part, upon the total processing value.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the first value relates to an amount of time for processing the project and the second value relates to an amount of time for determining the first value.

23. The system of claim 21, wherein the first value relates to a cost for processing the project and the second value relates to a cost for determining the first value.

24. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is further programmed to generate an authorization request for the processing of the project, if the categorizing of the project request meets a predetermined rule.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein the predetermined rule relates to whether the total processing value is greater than a predetermined threshold.

26. The system of claim 26, wherein the predetermined threshold relates to an amount of time for processing the project request and determining the first value.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein the predetermined threshold relates to a cost for processing the project request and determining the first value.

28. A system for monitoring the processing of a project, wherein the project is defined by a project request, the system comprising:

an interface to receive a first value associated with processing the project request, and for receiving a second value associated with determining the first value;

a processor programmed to compare the second value with an estimated sizing value, wherein the estimated sizing value relates to an estimated value for determining the first value; and

a storage device to store comparison information, wherein the comparison information is based, at least in part, upon comparing the estimated sizing value with the second value.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the interface further receives the project request; and

the processor is further programmed to determine an amount of time that transpires between receiving the project request and receiving the first value; and

wherein the second value relates to the amount of time for determining the first value, and the estimated sizing value relates to an estimated amount of time for determining the first value.

30. The system of claim 28, wherein the processor is further programmed to generate a report, wherein the report is based, at least in part, upon the comparison information.

31. A system for monitoring the processing of a project, wherein the project is defined by a project request, the system comprising:

an interface to receive a first value associated with processing a project;

a processor programmed to compare the first value with an estimated processing value, wherein the estimated processing value relates to an estimated value for processing the project request; and

a storage device to store comparison information, wherein the comparison information is based upon the comparing of the estimated processing value with the first value.

32. The system of claim 31, wherein the processor is further programmed to generate a report based, at least in part, upon the comparison information.