Method and system for component replacement based on use and error correlation

• US 20060039708A1
• Filed: 08/20/2004
• Published: 02/23/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 08/20/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Eastman Kodak Company
• Original Assignee: Eastman Kodak Company
• Inventors: Furno, Joseph J., Doty, Kenneth T., Carling, Richard R.T.
• Granted Patent: US 7,127,185 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 399/24
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/55 Self-diagnostics; Malfunction or lifetime display
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/553 Monitoring or warning means for exhaustion or lifetime end of consumables, e.g. indication of insufficient copy sheet quantity for a job
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/00067 on recording medium
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/00118 using fuzzy logic
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2221/1663 having lifetime indicators

Abstract

A method and system, for component replacement, which use a combination of replaceable component life tracking and error condition occurrence history to identify the need for component replacement.

Claims

1. In a system with operator replaceable component devices and identifiable error conditions, a method of determining a replacement need for each operator replaceable component device, said method comprising the steps of:

tracking a system use using a predetermined parameter;

providing a predetermined life expectancy for each said operator replaceable component device, in terms of said predetermined parameter;

tracking an accumulated life for each said operator replaceable component device, using said predetermined parameter;

tracking an occurrence frequency of each identifiable error condition;

cross-referencing each said operator replaceable component device to each said error condition with a probability factor, each said probability factor being a predetermined probability, expressed as a %, that said replaceable component could contribute to the cause of said error condition;

for each said operator replaceable component device, tracking an error weighting, said error weighting being the sum, for all said error conditions, of the result of multiplying each said probability factor for each said error condition times said occurrence frequency for each said error condition;

for each said operator replaceable component device, comparing a predetermined combination of said accumulated life and said error weighting with a predetermined threshold; and

reporting to the system operator the result of the comparing step, for all said operator replaceable component devices, on a periodic basis, said periodic basis being a predetermined amount of said system use.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of notifying the system operator as soon as said predetermined combination meets or exceeds said threshold for any one of said operator replaceable component devices.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of notifying further includes determining if said operator replaceable component device, for which said predetermined combination meets or exceeds said threshold, was replaced and, if said operator replaceable component device was replaced, re-setting said accumulated life and said error weighting of said operator replaceable component device to zero.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said predetermined combination is the sum of (said accumulated life)(100)/(said life expectancy) plus said error weighting.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of notifying the system operator as soon as said predetermined combination meets or exceeds said threshold for any one of said operator replaceable component devices.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of notifying the system operator further includes determining if said operator replaceable component device, for which said predetermined combination meets or exceeds said threshold, was replaced and, if said operator replaceable component device was replaced, was said accumulated life and said error weighting of said operator replaceable component device reset to zero.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein when said system is a printing device, said predetermined parameter is the number of pages printed.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein said predetermined parameter further includes a categorization of pages printed.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein said predetermined parameter further includes the size of pages printed.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein said predetermined parameter further includes a color related parameter.

11. A system with operator enabled maintenance and identifiable error conditions, said system comprising:

a plurality of operator replaceable component (ORC) device, each said ORC devices having an expected life span using a predetermined parameter;

a computational element having stored therein a data table cross-referencing, with a probability factor, each said ORC device to each identifiable error condition, each said probability factor being a predetermined probability, expressed as a %, that said ORC device could contribute to the cause of said error condition;

a use mechanism coupled to said computational element and to each said ORC device, said use mechanism tracking a system use and, for each said ORC device, tracking an ORC device use, using said predetermined parameter;

an error detection mechanism coupled to said computational element and to each said ORC device, said error detection mechanism tracking;

     1) an occurrence frequency of each said error condition, and

     2) an ORC device error weighting, said ORC error weighting being the sum, for all said error conditions, of the result of multiplying each said probability factor times said occurrence frequency for each said error condition;

a comparison mechanism coupled to said computational element and to each said ORC device, said comparison mechanism comparing to a predetermined threshold, for each said ORC, a predetermined combination of said ORC use and said ORC error weighting;

a user interface including a display mechanism and a graphical user interface; and

a reporting mechanism, responsive to said comparison mechanism, providing, on a periodic basis, a report to the system operator via said user interface, said periodic basis being a predetermined amount of said system use.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein said reporting mechanism reports to the system operator as soon as said predetermined combination, for any one of said ORC devices, meets or exceeds said predetermined threshold.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein said use mechanism further determines if said ORC device, for which said predetermined combination meets or exceeds said predetermined threshold, was replaced, and, if said ORC device was replaced, was said ORC use and said ORC error weighting of said ORC device reset to zero.

14. The system of claim 11, wherein said predetermined combination is the sum of (ORC device use)(100)/(said life expectancy) plus said error weighting.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein said reporting mechanism reports to the system operator as soon as said predetermined combination, for any one of said ORC devices, meets or exceeds said predetermined threshold.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein said use mechanism further determines if said ORC device, for which said predetermined combination meets or exceeds said predetermined threshold, was replaced, and, if said ORC device was replaced, was said ORC use and said ORC error weighting of said ORC device reset to zero.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein when said system is a printing device, said predetermined parameter is the number of pages printed.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein said predetermined parameter further includes a categorization of pages printed.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein said predetermined parameter further includes the size of pages printed.

20. The system of claim 18, wherein said predetermined parameter further includes a color related parameter.