Maximizing profit and minimizing losses in controlling air pollution

• US 20060047607A1
• Filed: 08/27/2004
• Published: 03/02/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 08/27/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Alstom Technology Ltd. (Alstom SA)
• Original Assignee: Alstom Technology Ltd. (Alstom SA)
• Inventors: Piche, Stephen, Boyden, Scott A.
• Application Number:
  US10/927,200
• Publication Number:
  US 20060047607A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/400
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 11/32 with inputs from more than one sensing element; with outputs to more than one correcting element
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 13/048 using a predictor
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0283 Price estimation or determination

Abstract

A controller directs the operation of an air pollution control (APC) system performing a process, having one or more controllable operating parameters, to control emissions of a pollutant. An interface receives financial data associated with the operation of the APC system. A control processor determines a target set point of each of at least one of the one or more controllable operating parameters that will maximize profits or minimize losses from the operation of the APC system, based on the received financial data. The control processor also directs control of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter based on the determined target set point for that parameter.

Claims

1. A controller for directing operation of an air pollution control (APC) system performing a process to control emissions of a pollutant, having one or more controllable operating parameters, comprising:

an interface configured to receive financial data associated with the operation of the APC system; and

a control processor having logic (i) to determine a target set point of each of at least one of the one or more controllable operating parameters that will maximize profits or minimize losses from the operation of the APC system, based on the received financial data and (ii) to direct control of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter of the APC system based on the determined target set point.

2. The controller according to claim 1, further comprising:

one of a neural network process model and a non-neural network process model representing a relationship between each of the one or more controllable operating parameters and the emitted amount of pollution;

wherein the target set point of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined based also on the one model.

3. The controller according to claim 2, wherein:

the one model includes one of a first principle model, a hybrid model, and a regression model.

4. The controller according to claim 1, wherein:

the APC process has one or more defined operating limits; and

the target set point of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined based also on at least one of the one or more defined operating limits.

5. The controller according to claim 1, wherein:

the APC system has one or more defined operating limits;

the received financial data includes data representing a unit cost of a consumable expended in performing the process; and

the target set point of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined by (i) predicting a cost of performing the process at each of multiple different set points for that controllable operating parameter based on the unit cost of the consumable and at least one of the one or more defined operating limits, and (ii) selecting one of the multiple different target set points for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter based on the predicted cost.

6. The controller according to claim 5, wherein:

the at least one defined operating limit includes a regulatory limit on an amount of pollutant emitted by the APC system;

the received financial data also includes data representing a value of an available regulatory credit for emitting less pollutant than the regulatory limit; and

the target set point of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined based also on a value corresponding to the value of the available regulatory credit.

7. The controller according to claim 6, wherein:

the target set point for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined by (i) predicting a value of regulatory credits that would be earned by operating the APC system at each of multiple different set points for that controllable operating parameter based on the value of the available regulatory credit, and (ii) selecting the target set point for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter based also on the predicted values of earned regulatory credits.

8. The controller according to claim 7, wherein:

the control processor directs control of the one or more controllable operating parameters such that (i) the cost of performing the process and the value of earned regulatory credits are predicted to increase in the future, (ii) the cost of performing the process and the value of earned regulatory credits are predicted to decrease in the future, or (iii) the cost of performing the process is predicted to decrease and the value of earned regulatory credits is predicted to remain unchanged in the future.

9. The controller according to claim 5, wherein:

the at least one defined operating limit includes a limit on a minimum quality of a byproduct produced by the APC system;

the received financial data also includes data representing an available difference in values of the byproduct if the minimum quality limit is met and if the minimum quality limit is either not met or exceeded; and

the target set point of each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined based also on a value corresponding to the available difference in value of the byproduct.

10. The controller according to claim 9, wherein:

the target set point for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter is determined by (i) predicting a difference in values of the byproduct to be produced if the minimum quality limit is met and if the minimum quality limit is either not met or exceeded by operating the APC system at each of the multiple different set points for that controllable operating parameter, based on the available difference in value, and (ii) selecting one of the multiple different target set points for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter based on the predicted differences in value of the produced byproduct.

11. The controller according to claim 10, wherein:

the control processor directs control of the one or more controllable operating parameters such that (i) the cost of performing the process and the value of the produced byproduct are predicted to increase in the future, (ii) the cost of performing the process and the value of the produced byproduct are predicted to decrease in the future or (iii) the cost of performing the process is predicted to decrease and the value of the produced byproduct is predicted to remain unchanged in the future.

12. The controller according to claim 1, wherein:

the control processor determines the target set point for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter and directs control of the at least one controllable operating parameter in real time.

13. The controller according to claim 1, wherein:

the APC system is a wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system that receives SO₂ laden wet flue gas, expend power to apply oxidation air and limestone slurry to remove SO₂ from the received SO₂ laden wet flue gas and produce a gypsum byproduct, and exhausts desulfurized flue gas;

the one or more defined operating limits include a minimum required amount of SO₂ to be removed from the received SO₂ laden wet flue gas, and a minimum required quality of the produced gypsum byproduct;

the one or more controllable operating parameters include a first parameter corresponding to an amount of the applied oxidation air and a second parameter corresponding to an amount of the applied limestone slurry;

the received financial data associated with operation of the APC system includes a unit power cost for the power to be expended to apply the oxidation air and the limestone slurry, a unit value of available regulatory credits for removing more SO₂ than the minimum required amount from the received SO₂ laden wet flue gas, and a unit value available for gypsum byproduct having a higher or lower quality than the minimum required quality; and

the control processor determines the target set points for the first and the second parameters that will maximize profit or minimize losses from the operation of the WFGD system, based on the unit power cost, the unit value of available regulatory credits, and the unit value of higher or lower quality gypsum byproduct.

14. The controller according to claim 1, wherein:

the APC system is a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system that receives NO_x laden flue gas, applies ammonia and dilution air to remove NO_x from the received NO_x laden flue gas, thereby controlling emissions of NO_x and consuming ammonia, and exhausts reduced NO_x flue gas;

the one or more defined operating limits include a limit on a maximum amount of NO_x in the exhausted flue gas;

the one or more controllable operating parameters include a parameter corresponding to an amount of the applied ammonia;

the received financial data associated with operation of the APC system includes a unit cost for ammonia, and a unit value of an available regulatory credit for removing more NO_x than the minimum required amount from the received NO_x laden flue gas; and

the control processor determines the target set point for the parameter corresponding to an amount of the applied ammonia that will maximize profit or minimize losses from the operation of the SCR system, based on the unit cost of ammonia and the unit value of available regulatory credit.

15. A method for directing control of a process, for controlling emissions of a pollutant, having one or more controllable process parameters, comprising:

determining a target set point for each of at least one of the one or more controllable process parameters that will maximize profit or minimize losses from the performance of the APC process, based on financial data associated with the performance of the APC process; and

directing control of each of the at least one controllable process parameter based on the determined target set point for that controllable process parameter.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein:

the APC process has one or more defined process limits;

the financial data includes data representing a unit cost of a consumable expended in the performance of the process; and

the target set point for each of the at least one controllable process parameter is determined by predicting a cost of performing the APC process with each of multiple different set points for that controllable process parameter, based on the unit cost of the consumable and at least one of the one or more defined process limits.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein:

the at least one defined process limit includes a regulatory limit on an amount of pollutant emitted by the APC process;

the financial data includes data representing a value of an available regulatory credit for emitting less pollutant than the regulatory limit; and

the target set point for each of the at least one controllable process parameter is determined by (i) predicting a value of regulatory credits that would be earned by performing the APC process at each of the multiple different set points for that controllable process parameter, based on the value of the available regulatory credit, and (ii) selecting the target set point for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter based also on the predicted values of earned regulatory credits.

18. The method according to claim 16, wherein:

the at least one defined process limit includes a limit on a minimum quality of a byproduct produced by the APC process;

the received financial data includes data representing an available difference in values of the byproduct if the minimum quality limit is met and if the minimum quality limit is either not met or exceeded; and

the target set point for each of the at least one controllable process parameter is determined by (i) predicting a difference in values of the byproduct to be produced if the minimum quality limit is met and if the minimum quality limit is either not met or exceeded by performing the APC process at each of the multiple different set points for that controllable operating parameter, based on the available difference in value, and (ii) selecting one of the multiple different target set points for each of the at least one controllable operating parameter based on the predicted differences in value of the produced byproduct.

19. The method according to claim 15, further comprising:

the target set point for each of the at least one controllable process parameter is determined based also on one of a neural network process model and a non-neural network process model representing a relationship between each of the one or more controllable operating parameters and the emitted amount of pollution.

20. The method according to claim 19, wherein:

the one model includes one of a first principle model, a hybrid model, and a regression model.

21. A wet flue gas desulfurizing system, comprising:

a wet flue gas desulfurizer operable (i) to receive SO₂ laden wet flue gas, (ii) to expend power to apply oxidation air and limestone slurry to remove SO₂ from the received SO₂ laden wet flue gas and produce gypsum, and (iii) to exhaust desulfurized flue gas;

a controller configured (i) to receive financial data associated with operation of the of the wet flue gas desulfurizer and (ii) to determine target set points for a first parameter corresponding to an amount of the applied oxidation air and for a second parameter corresponding an amount of the applied limestone slurry, which will maximize profit or minimize losses from the operation of the wet flue gas desulfurizer, based on the received financial data and on one of a neural network process model and a non-neural network process model representing a relationship between each of the one or more controllable operating parameters and the emitted amount of pollution, and (iii) to direct control of the first parameter and the second parameter based on the determined target set points.

22. The system according to claim 21, wherein:

the received financial data includes a value representing a unit cost of the power; and

the controller is further configured to determine the target set points for the first and the second parameters by predicting a cost of operating the wet flue gas desulfurizer at each of multiple different set points for the first and the second parameters, based on the unit cost of power.

23. The system according to claim 22, wherein:

the wet flue gas desulfurizer has a regulatory limit on an amount of SO₂ in the exhausted desulfurized flue gas;

the received financial data represents a unit value of available regulatory credits for exhausting desulfurized flue gas having an amount of SO₂ below the regulatory limit; and

the controller is further configured to determine the target set points for the first and the second parameters, based on the value of the regulatory credit.

24. A selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system, comprising:

a selective catalytic reducer operable (i) to receive NO_x laden flue gas, (ii) to apply ammonia and dilution air to remove NO_x from the received NO_x laden flue gas, thereby consuming ammonia and controlling emissions of NO_x, and (iii) to exhaust reduced NO_x flue gas; and

a controller configured (i) to receive financial data associated with operation of the selective catalytic reducer and (ii) to determine a target set point for a parameter corresponding to an amount of the applied ammonia, which will maximize profit or minimize losses from the operation of the selective catalytic reducer, based on the received financial data and on one of a neural network process model and a non-neural network process model representing a relationship between each of the one or more controllable operating parameters and the emitted amount of pollution, and (iii) to direct control of the parameter based on the determined target set point.

25. The system according to claim 24, wherein:

the received financial data includes a value representing a unit cost of ammonia; and

the controller is further configured to determine the target set point for the parameter by predicting a cost of operating the selective catalytic reducer at each of multiple different set points for that parameter, based on the unit cost of the ammonia.

26. The system according to claim 25, wherein:

the selective catalytic reducer has a regulatory limit on an amount of NO_x in the exhausted reduced NO_x flue gas;

the received financial data represents a unit value of an available regulatory credit for exhausting reduced NO_x flue gas having an amount of NO_x below the regulatory limit; and

the controller is further configured to determine the target set point for the parameter by predicting a value of the regulatory credit to be earned at each of the multiple different set points for the parameter, based on the value of the regulatory credit.