Classification system and method using relative orientations of a vehicle occupant

• US 20060052923A1
• Filed: 09/03/2004
• Published: 03/09/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 09/03/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Eaton Corp. (Wisconsin) (Eaton Corporation PLC.)
• Original Assignee: Eaton Corp. (Wisconsin) (Eaton Corporation PLC.)
• Inventors: Farmer, Michael, Bapna, Shweta
• Application Number:
  US10/934,620
• Publication Number:
  US 20060052923A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/45
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/01538 for image processing, e.g. cameras or sensor arrays

Abstract

The present invention relates in general to systems and methods for classifying target information acquired with a sensor. In particular, the systems and methods relate to integrating relative orientations of the target information into evidential reasoning heuristics that are used to classify the target information. An exemplary system for classifying target information includes: an initial classification subsystem for determining an initial classification of the target information; a tracking subsystem for identifying a relative orientation of the target information in relation to a predefined reference; and a weighted classification determination subsystem for generating a classification of the target information based on said initial classification and said relative orientation.

Claims

1. A method of using a visual image acquired by a sensor to classify a vehicle occupant in a vehicle safety restraint application, the method comprising:

generating an initial classification of the vehicle occupant;

identifying a relative orientation of the vehicle occupant in relation to a predefined reference; and

generating a weighted classification of the vehicle occupant based on said initial classification and said relative orientation.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said relative orientation is identified by fitting an ellipse to the vehicle occupant.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said relative orientation is identified by an angular pitch of said ellipse in relation to said predefined reference.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said predefined reference includes a generally vertical axis representative of a generally upright orientation of the vehicle occupant.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising categorizing said relative orientation as being within one of a generally upright zone, a generally forward-pitch zone, and a generally rearward-pitch zone.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said generating of said weighted classification includes using an evidential reasoning heuristic, said relative orientation being factored into said evidential reasoning heuristic to generate said weighted classification.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said evidential reasoning heuristic is configured for determining a weighted probability of said initial classification based on said relative orientation.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein said weighted probability is defined as a product of an initial probability and a likelihood of correct classification, said likelihood of correct classification being a function of said relative orientation.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising reducing said likelihood of correct classification when said relative orientation is determined to be within one of a predefined forward-pitch zone and a predefined rearward-pitch zone.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein an extent of said relative orientation influences a value by which said likelihood of correct classification is reduced.

11. The method of claim 7, further comprising setting said weighted probability to ignorance when said relative orientation is forward-leaning by at least approximately a predetermined threshold.

12. The method of claim 6, wherein said evidential reasoning heuristic includes averaging historical classification attributes to generate said weighted classification, and wherein said relative orientation is incorporated into said historical classification attributes.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein said historical classification attributes include probability metrics that are configured to be influenced by said relative orientation.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing said weighted classification to the vehicle safety restraint application.

15. A method of implementing an occupant classifier for use in a vehicle safety restraint application, comprising:

configuring a tracker to use a visual image to identify a relative orientation of a vehicle occupant in relation to a predefined reference;

implementing a weighted classification heuristic configured to generate a weighted classification of the vehicle occupant based on historical classification attributes that are configured to be influenced by said relative orientation and an initial classification of the vehicle occupant;

defining a group as a disablement decision; and

configuring the vehicle safety restraint application to preclude deployment of a safety restraint device when said weighted classification indicates that the vehicle occupant is classified as said group.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

defining a zone of unreliability;

implementing a plausibility metric in said historical classification attributes, wherein said plausibility metric is configured to be reduced when said relative orientation falls within said zone of unreliability.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising configuring said plausibility metric to be reduced by a value that corresponds with an extent of said relative orientation.

18. A system for classifying target information of a visual image acquired with a sensor, comprising:

an initial classification determination subsystem for generating an initial classification of the target information;

a tracking subsystem for identifying a relative orientation of the target information in relation to a predefined reference; and

a weighted classification determination subsystem for generating a weighted classification of the target information based on said initial classification and said relative orientation.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein said tracking subsystem includes an ellipse defined and fitted to the target information to identify said relative orientation.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein said tracking subsystem includes an angular pitch of said ellipse in relation to said predefined reference, said angular pitch being indicative of said relative orientation.

21. The system of claim 18, wherein said predefined reference includes a generally vertical axis.

22. The system of claim 18, wherein said tracking subsystem includes a generally upright zone, a generally forward-pitch zone, and a generally rearward-pitch zone, said tracking subsystem being configured to categorize said relative orientation as being within one of said generally upright zone, said generally forward-pitch zone, and said generally rearward-pitch zone.

23. The system of claim 18, wherein said weighted classification determination subsystem includes an evidential reasoning heuristic configured to factor in said relative orientation to generate said weighted classification.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein said evidential reasoning heuristic includes a weighted probability of said initial classification based on said relative orientation.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein said weighted probability comprises a product of an initial probability and a likelihood of correct classification, said likelihood of correct classification being a function of said relative orientation.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein said tracking subsystem includes a predefined forward-pitch zone and a predefined rearward-pitch zone, and said weighted classification determination subsystem is configured to reduce said likelihood of correct classification when said relative orientation is determined to be within one of said predefined forward-pitch zone and said predefined rearward-pitch zone.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein said weighted classification determination subsystem includes an extent of said relative orientation, said extent being configured to influence a value by which said likelihood of correct classification is reduced.

28. The system of claim 18, wherein said weighted classification determination subsystem includes historical classification attributes configured to be averaged by said weighted classification determination subsystem to generate said weighted classification, wherein said relative orientation is incorporated in said historical classification attributes.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein said historical classification attributes include probability metrics that are configured to be influenced by said relative orientation.

30. A system for classifying a vehicle occupant in a vehicle safety restraint application, comprising:

a sensor configured to acquire a target image representative of the vehicle occupant in the vehicle safety restraint application;

a computer configured to;

generate an initial classification of said target image;

track said target image to identify a relative orientation of the vehicle occupant in relation to a predefined reference;

generate a weighted classification of the vehicle occupant using an evidential reasoning heuristic, wherein said weighted classification is based on said initial classification and said relative orientation; and

provide the vehicle safety restraint application with said weighted classification.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein said computer is configured to identify said relative orientation by fitting an ellipse to the vehicle occupant.

32. The system of claim 31, wherein said computer is configured to indicates said relative orientation as an angular pitch of said ellipse in relation to said predefined reference.

33. The system of claim 30, wherein said predefined reference includes a generally vertical axis representative of a generally upright orientation of the vehicle occupant.

34. The system of claim 30, wherein said computer is configured to categorize said relative orientation as being within one of a generally upright zone, a generally forward-pitch zone, and a generally rearward-pitch zone.

35. The system of claim 30, wherein said evidential reasoning heuristic is configured to factor in said relative orientation to generate said weighted classification.

36. The system of claim 35, wherein said computer is configured to determine a weighted probability of said initial classification based on said relative orientation.

37. The system of claim 36, wherein said computer is configured to define said weighted probability as a product of an initial probability and a likelihood of correct classification, said likelihood of correct classification being a function of said relative orientation.

38. The system of claim 37, wherein said computer is configured to reduce said likelihood of correct classification when said relative orientation is determined to be within one of a predefined forward-pitch zone and a predefined rearward-pitch zone.

39. The system of claim 38, wherein said computer is configured to determine an extent of said relative orientation and use said extend to influence a value by which said likelihood of correct classification is reduced.

40. The system of claim 35, wherein said evidential reasoning heuristic includes historical classification attributes for averaging to generate said weighted classification, and wherein said relative orientation is incorporated into said historical classification attributes.

41. The system of claim 40, wherein said historical classification attributes include probability metrics that are configured to be influenced by said relative orientation.