System and method for data extraction and management in multi-relational ontology creation

• US 20060053174A1
• Filed: 05/05/2005
• Published: 03/09/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 09/03/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: BioWisdom Ltd. (Instem Plc)
• Original Assignee: Bio Wisdom Limited
• Inventors: Davis, Benjamin, Eldridge, Matthew David, Chambers, Jonathan Kim, Gardner, Stephen Philip, Hill, Robin Duncan, McMenamin, Conor, Beaumont, Simon Edwin
• Application Number:
  US11/122,068
• Publication Number:
  US 20060053174A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/353 into predefined classes
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/358 Browsing; Visualisation therefor
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/367 Ontology
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/38 Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6245 Protecting personal data, e.g. for financial or medical purposes

Abstract

The invention relates to a system and method for data extraction and management in multi-relational ontology creation. The system of the invention includes selecting a corpus of documents containing information relevant to a targeted knowledge domain, extracting assertions and their constituent concepts and relationships from the corpus, and storing the assertions, wherein the extraction processes may rules and utilize natural language processing.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented system for extracting data from one or more data sources for the creation of one or more multi-relational ontologies, comprising:

an upper ontology that specifies, for a specific domain, a set of concept types and relationship types, a hierarchy of concept types and relationship types, a set of specific pairs of concept types, and a set of permissible relationship types that may be used to connect specific pair of concept types;

a plurality of data sources;

means for selecting a corpus of documents from the plurality of data sources, at least one of the documents being related to the specific domain;

a set of rules relating to the creation of assertions, wherein assertions comprise a first concept, a second concept, and a relationship between the first concept and the second concept;

an extraction module for;

(i) extracting from the corpus of documents, in accordance with the rules, concepts and relationships between concepts to form rules-based assertions; and

(ii) associating evidence information with each of the rules-based assertions; and

means for storing the rules-based assertions and evidence information in one or more databases.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the upper ontology specifies a set of permissible property types for each concept type and each relationship type.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for selecting a corpus of documents includes electronically scanning a set of metadata associated with one or more documents contained in the plurality of data sources and selecting documents with metadata indicating relevance to the specific domain.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for selecting a corpus of documents includes electronically scanning the content of one or more documents contained in the plurality of data sources, and selecting documents with content indicating relevance to the specific domain.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for selecting a corpus of documents includes manually selecting documents with content indicating relevance to the specific domain.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data sources comprises at least one of:

one or more structured data sources;

one or more unstructured data sources;

or

one or more semi-structured data sources.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more of the documents of the corpus originate from one or more structured data sources, and wherein extracting concepts and relationships includes utilizing one or more rules from the set of rules for discerning the structure of the one or more documents, identifying target assertions, and parsing the data source to extract rules-based assertions from the one or more documents.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more of the documents of the corpus originate from one or more unstructured data sources, and wherein the extraction module comprises an automated rules-based text-mining module.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the text-mining module extracts concepts and relationships by utilizing one or more rules from the set of rules for performing natural language processing to tag parts of speech that comprise one or more assertions, and extracting one or more rules-based assertions from the tagged parts of speech.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the text-mining module extracts concepts and relationships by utilizing one or more rules from the set of rules forperforming ontology-seeded natural language processing to tag parts of speech that comprise one or more assertions, and extracting one or more rules-based assertions from the tagged parts of speech.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more of the documents of the corpus are websites, and wherein extracting concepts and relationships includes utilizing one or more rules along with a web crawler to extract one or more rules-based assertions.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein the evidence information includes at least one of a data source indicator or a document indicator.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the evidence information includes at least one of a data source indicator detailing at least one of the identity of at least one data source for each rule-based assertion, or the type of data source for the at least one data source.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the evidence information includes at least one of a document indicator detailing at least the identity of at least one document from within the at least one data source.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein the evidence information includes at least one document indicator including at least the identity of at least one document from within the at least one data source that evidences the assertion and a link to the at least one document evidencing the assertion.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the evidence information includes at least one document indicator including the identity of at least one document from within the at least one data source that evidences the assertion and a link to a portion of the at least one document evidencing the assertion, and wherein one or more words evidencing the assertions are highlighted.

17. The system of claim 1, further comprising means for automatically semantically normalizing assertions.

18. The system of claim 1, further comprising an editor module including an interface for enabling a curator to view, edit, and validate at least one of the rules-based assertions to form a reified assertion.

19. The system of claim 1, further comprising an editor module including an interface for enabling a curator to create new assertions which comprises a reified assertion.

20. The system of claim 18, further comprising means for storing the reified assertion and evidence information in a database as a domain specific ontology.

21. The system of claim 19, further comprising means for storing the reified assertion and evidence information in a database as a domain specific ontology.

22. The system of claim 18, wherein the interface includes a document viewer.

23. The system of claim 19, wherein the interface includes a document viewer.

24. The system of claim 18, wherein the interface comprises a document viewer;

further comprising means for associating an identity of a curator and a history of curator action with the at least one of the rule-based assertions.

25. The system of claim 19, wherein the interface comprises a document viewer;

further comprising means for associating an identity of a curator and a history of curator action with at least one of the new assertions.

26. A computer-implemented method for extracting data from one or more data sources for the creation of one or more multi-relational ontologies, comprising:

providing an upper ontology that specifies, for a specific domain, a set of concept types and relationship types, a hierarchy of concept types and relationship types, a set of specific pairs of concept types, and a set of permissible relationship types that may be used to connect specific pair of concept types;

providing a plurality of data sources;

selecting a corpus of documents from the plurality of data sources, at least one of the documents being related to the specific domain;

providing a set of rules relating to the creation of assertions, wherein assertions comprise a first concept, a second concept, and a relationship between the first concept and the second concept;

extracting from the corpus of documents, in accordance with one or more of the rules from the set of rules, concepts and relationships between concepts to form rules-based assertions;

associating evidence information with each of the rules-based assertions; and

storing the rules-based assertions and evidence information in one or more databases.