Methods for service monitoring and control

• US 20060064486A1
• Filed: 11/22/2004
• Published: 03/23/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 09/17/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Baron, Anthony, Zakrajsek, Frank, Sarwono, Edhi, Pizzo, Kathryn, Sarabosing, Michael
• Application Number:
  US10/994,818
• Publication Number:
  US 20060064486A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0886 Fully automatic configuration
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/5019 Ensuring fulfilment of SLA
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/55 Testing of service level quality, e.g. simulating service usage

Abstract

In one aspect, a method of instructing operators in a best practices implementation of a service monitoring and control (SMC) facility performing a plurality of functions in a computer system comprising a plurality of services to be monitored is provided. The method comprises an act of providing best practices instructions for the implementation of the SMC facility in a hierarchical manner so that the implementation of the SMC facility is described as comprising a plurality of top level activities to be performed during the operation of the SMC, with each of the plurality of top level activities being described as comprising at least one lower level sub-activity, the top level activities comprising, assessing performance of the SMC facility, in response to information learned during assessing the performance of the SMC facility, implementing at least one change in the SMC facility, monitoring the computer system with the changed SMC facility for an occurrence of at least one event, and automatically performing at least one control action in response to the occurrence of the at least one event. In another aspect, a top-level activity of collaborating with one or more developers is described, resulting in a change to at least one change to software executed on the computer system. In another aspect, at least a part of the effectiveness of an SMC facility is automatically assessed, and in response, one of the plurality of functions performed by the SMC facility is automatically changed.

Claims

1. A method of instructing operators in a best practices operation of a service monitoring and control (SMC) facility in a computer system comprising a plurality of services to be monitored, the SMC facility performing a plurality of functions, the computer system being supported by at least one developer that develops software executed by the computer system to provide at least one of the plurality of services, the method comprising an act of instructing operators to:

during operation of the SMC facility, assess an effectiveness of the SMC facility in monitoring the computer system; and

in response to assessments made during operation, request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the software executed by the computer system to facilitate improved performance of the SMC facility.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the software exposes information about a plurality of events to form an interface, and wherein the act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the software includes an act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the interface.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the interface includes an act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer add information about at least one additional event to the interface.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the interface includes an act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer remove information about at least one of the plurality of events from the interface.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the interface includes an act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer modify information about at least one of the plurality of events in the interface.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the plurality of functions performed by the SMC facility is controlled, at least in part, by a plurality of rules which define a manner in which the SMC facility responds to an occurrence of one or more of the plurality of events, and wherein the act of instructing operators to assess includes an act of instructing operators to assess the effectiveness of the plurality of rules in maintaining an available computer system.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising an act of instructing operators to, prior to operating the SMC facility, instruct the at least one developer to define a health model for the software executed by the computer system.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the at least one software developer exposes information related to the performance of the software, the exposed information forming, at least in part, management instrumentation for the SMC facility, and wherein the health model identifies at least one healthy state and at least one degraded state for the software in terms of the exposed information.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the software includes an act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer modify the exposed information to facilitate improved management instrumentation.

10. The method of claim 8, further comprising an act of instructing operators to, prior to operating the SMC facility, establish the SMC facility.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the act of instructing operators to establish the SMC facility includes an act of instructing operators to consult with the at least one software developer about the exposed information to facilitate a desired management instrumentation.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the act of instructing operators includes an act of instructing operators to determine SMC tool requirements.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the act of instructing operators includes an act of instructing operators to implement at least one SMC tool based on the determination of SMC tool requirements.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the act of instructing operators to assess includes an act of instructing operators to assess the effectiveness of the at least one SMC tool.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the software includes an act of instructing operators to request that the at least one developer provide additional information accessible by the at least one SMC tool.

16. A method of operating a service monitoring and control (SMC) facility in a computer system comprising a plurality of services to be monitored, the SMC facility performing a plurality of functions, the computer system being supported by at least one developer that develops software executed by the computer system, the method comprising acts of:

during operation of the SMC facility, assessing an effectiveness of the SMC facility in monitoring the computer system; and

in response to assessments made during operation, requesting that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the software executed by the computer system to facilitate improved performance of the SMC facility.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the software exposes information about a plurality of events to form an interface, and wherein the act of requesting includes an act of requesting that the at least one developer implement at least one change to the interface.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the act of requesting includes an act of requesting that the at least one developer add information about at least one additional event to the interface.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the act of requesting includes an act of requesting that the at least one developer remove information about at least one of the plurality of events from the interface.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein the act of requesting includes an act of requesting that the at least one developer modify information about at least one of the plurality of events in the interface.

21. The method of claim 17, wherein the SMC facility includes a plurality of rules which define a manner in which the SMC facility responds to an occurrence of one or more of the plurality of events, and wherein the act of assessing includes an act of assessing the effectiveness of the plurality of rules in maintaining an available computer system.

22. The method of claim 16, further comprising an act of, prior to operating the SMC facility, instructing the at least one software developer to define a health model for the software executed by the computer system.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the at least one software developer exposes information related to the operation of the software to form, at least in part, management instrumentation for the SMC facility, and wherein the software developer defines the health model to identify at least one healthy state and at least one degraded state in terms of at least some of the exposed information.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the act of requesting includes an act of requesting that the at least one developer modify at least some of the exposed information to facilitate improved management instrumentation.

25. The method of claim 23, further comprising an act of, prior to operating the SMC facility, establishing the SMC facility.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the act of establishing the SMC facility includes an act of consulting with the at least one developer about the exposed information to achieve a desired management instrumentation of the SMC facility.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the act of establishing includes an act of determining SMC tool requirements.

28. The method of claim 27, further comprising an act of implementing at least one SMC tool based on the determination of the SMC tool requirements.

29. The method of claim 28, wherein the act of assessing includes an act of assessing the effectiveness of the at least one SMC tool.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the act of requesting includes an act of requesting that the at least one developer provide additional information accessible by the at least one SMC tool.