Word categories

• US 20060069562A1
• Filed: 09/10/2004
• Published: 03/30/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 09/10/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Scientific Learning Corp. (Carnegie Learning, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Scientific Learning Corp. (Carnegie Learning, Inc.)
• Inventors: Adams, Marilyn Jager, Beattie, Valerie L.
• Application Number:
  US10/939,295
• Publication Number:
  US 20060069562A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 704/251
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 17/006 with audible presentation of the material to be studied audio and audio-visual teaching apparatus in general G09B5/04, G09B5/06
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/06 Foreign languages with audible presentation of material to be studied G09B5/04
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 5/00 Electrically-operated educational appliances working with questions and answers G09B7/00; simulators G09B9/00; advertising or displaying in general G09F
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 15/22 Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 2015/225 Feedback of the input speech

Abstract

A computer based method and related system, device, and computer program product for analyzing reading fluency includes categorizing at least some words in a passage into word categories. The word category for a particular word can be based on its difficulty relative to the reading level of the passage, or its difficulty relative to the reading level of the user, or its significance to the passage content or lesson focus, or its mastery given the prior reading history of the user. The method also includes generating different types of responses by the tutor software based on the word category associated with a particular word.

Claims

1. A computer based method for analyzing reading fluency;

the method comprising;

categorizing at least some words in a passage into word categories according to each word'"'"'s difficulty relative to the reading level of the passage, or its difficulty relative to the reading level of the user, or its significance to the passage content or lesson focus, or its mastery given the prior reading history of the user;

and generating different types of responses by the tutor software based on the word category associated with a particular word.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the responses include at least one of a visual intervention, an audio intervention, color coding of words, and placing words on a review list.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the word categories include a glue word category and one or more target word categories.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the word categories include a category consisting of words that a user of the tutor software has already mastered, based on prior reading history for the user.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the word categories include a default word category consisting of words that have not been assigned to any other category.

6. The method of claim 3 wherein target words are words that are judged to be especially difficult relative to the other words in the passage and words whose correct reading is judged to be especially important relative to the meaning of the passage or the focus of the lesson.

7. The method of claim 3 wherein glue words are short, common, function words that are likely to be unstressed in fluent reading of the sentence, and that are expected to be thoroughly familiar to the user.

8. The method of claim 3 wherein the target word category includes words with a greater than average length compared to other words in the passage.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

generating an acoustic match confidence indication for a word based on a received audio input file and a stored statistical model for the word, and

requiring different acoustic match confidence scores for words in different word categories.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein requiring different acoustic match confidence scores for words in different word categories includes requiring a higher acoustic match confidence score for a word in a target word category than a word that is not in a target word category.

11. The method of claim 9 further comprising determining placement of the word in a review list based on the acoustic match confidence score.

12. The method of claim 9 wherein the acoustic match confidence is not used for color coding and review list status for some word categories.

13. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

measuring a time gap before or surrounding the audio segment identified via automatic speech recognition as a particular word in a received audio input file or buffer;

using a time gap threshold that is specific to the word category of the word; and

color coding the word as “

not correct” and

/or placing the word on a review list if the time gap is greater than the threshold.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the time gap measurement is not used for color coding and review list status for some word categories.

15. The method of claim 1 further comprising skipping a particular word in the glue word category without generating a visual intervention or audio intervention on the word if a valid recognition for a subsequent word in the sentence is received.

16. The method of claim 2 wherein placing words on the review list includes placing words from a subset of the word categories not including the glue word category on the review list.

17. The method of claim 1 further comprising automatically color-coding words in the glue word category as read correctly.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein words are categorized based on each word'"'"'s significance to the passage or sentence content.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein words are categorized based on word lists for each category.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the word list for a word category is based on the text being read and the reading level of that text.

21. The method of claim 19 wherein the word list for a word category is based on a user of the tutoring software, the reading level of that user, and that user'"'"'s prior reading history.

22. The method of claim 19 wherein the word list for a word category is based on the lesson focus of the text being read.

23. A computer program product residing on a computer readable medium comprising instructions for causing an electrical device to:

categorize at least some words in a passage into word categories according to each word'"'"'s difficulty relative to the reading level of the passage, or its difficulty relative to the reading level of the user, or its significance to the passage content or lesson focus, or its mastery given the prior reading history of the user; and

generate different types of responses by the tutor software based on the word category associated with a particular word.

24. The computer program product of claim 23 further comprising instructions for causing an electrical device to:

generate an acoustic match confidence indication for a word based on a received audio input file and a stored statistical model for the word, and

require different acoustic match confidence scores for words in different word categories.

25. The computer program product of claim 23 further comprising instructions for causing an electrical device to placement of the word in a review list based on the acoustic match confidence score.

26. The computer program product of claim 23 further comprising instructions for causing an electrical device to:

measure a time gap before or surrounding the audio segment identified via automatic speech recognition as a particular word in a received audio input file or buffer;

use a time gap threshold that is specific to the word category of the word; and

color code the word as “

not correct” and

/or placing the word on a review list if the time gap is greater than the threshold.

27. A device configured to:

categorize at least some words in a passage into word categories according to each word'"'"'s difficulty relative to the reading level of the passage, or its difficulty relative to the reading level of the user, or its significance to the passage content or lesson focus, or its mastery given the prior reading history of the user; and

generate different types of responses by the tutor software based on the word category associated with a particular word.

28. The device of claim 27 further configured to:

generate an acoustic match confidence indication for a word based on a received audio input file and a stored statistical model for the word, and

require different acoustic match confidence scores for words in different word categories.

29. The device of claim 27 further configured to determine placement of the word in a review list based on the acoustic match confidence score.

30. The device of claim 27 further configured to:

measure a time gap before or surrounding the audio segment identified via automatic speech recognition as a particular word in a received audio input file or buffer;

use a time gap threshold that is specific to the word category of the word; and

color code the word as “

not correct” and

/or placing the word on a review list if the time gap is greater than the threshold.