Allowing multiple decisions to be made by multiple decision makers during software installation

• US 20060070061A1
• Filed: 09/30/2004
• Published: 03/30/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 09/30/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Peters, Christopher A., Ullmann, Lorin E., Lawton, Craig M., Lewis, Jonathan A., Cox, David E.
• Application Number:
  US10/955,200
• Publication Number:
  US 20060070061A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/174
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/61 Installation

Abstract

A method, computer program product and system for allowing multiple decisions to be made by multiple decision makers during software installation. A developer of an installer program may select the decisions to be made during the installation process. The developer may further designate the decision makers to handle each of these decisions in a configuration file. The configuration file may be compiled into executable code where the executable code may be embedded in the installer program. By the developer designating multiple decision makers to handle multiple decisions, multiple decision makers may now be able to be involved during the software installation process.

Claims

1. A method for allowing multiple decisions to be made by multiple decision makers during software installation comprising the steps of:

selecting decisions to be made during an installation process;

designating decision makers for each selected decision in a configuration file;

compiling said configuration file into executable code; and

embedding said executable code into an installer program.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of:

detecting one or more previously installed applications.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 further comprising the step of:

determining if there are any conflicts between a program to be installed and said one or more detected applications.

4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein if there is a conflict between said program to be installed and said one or more detected applications then the method further comprises the step of:

determining an appropriate conflict resolution.

5. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein if there is a conflict between said program to be installed and said one or more detected applications then the method further comprises the step of:

providing a decision maker with an option to continue said installation process.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of:

encountering a decision to be made.

7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by a user then the method further comprises the steps of:

displaying a user interface image requesting a decision to handle said encountered decision; and

receiving said requested decision.

8. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by a software program then the method further comprises the steps of:

transmitting a request for a decision to handle said encountered decision; and

receiving said requested decision.

9. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by said installer program then the method further comprises the step of:

handling said encountered decision automatically.

10. The method as recited in claim 6 further comprising the step of:

receiving a response from a decision maker to handle said encountered decision.

11. The method as recited in claim 10 further comprising the step of:

reconfiguring said installer program in response to said received response from said decision maker.

12. A computer program product embodied in a machine readable medium for allowing multiple decisions to be made by multiple decision makers during software installation comprising the programming steps of:

compiling a configuration file into executable code, wherein said configuration file contains designated decision makers for each decision to be made during an installation process; and

embedding said executable code into an installer program.

13. The computer program product as recited in claim 12 further comprising the programming step of:

detecting one or more previously installed applications.

14. The computer program product as recited in claim 13 further comprising the programming step of:

determining if there are any conflicts between a program to be installed and said one or more detected applications.

15. The computer program product as recited in claim 14, wherein if there is a conflict between said program to be installed and said one or more detected applications then the computer program product further comprises the programming step of:

determining an appropriate conflict resolution.

16. The computer program product as recited in claim 14, wherein if there is a conflict between said program to be installed and said one or more detected applications then the computer program product further comprises the programming step of:

further comprising the programming step of;

providing a decision maker with an option to continue said installation process.

17. The computer program product as recited in claim 12 further comprising the programming step of:

encountering a decision to be made.

18. The computer program product as recited in claim 17, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by a user then the computer program product further comprises the programming steps of:

displaying a user interface image requesting a decision to handle said encountered decision; and

receiving said requested decision.

19. The computer program product as recited in claim 17, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by a software program then the computer program product further comprises the programming steps of:

transmitting a request for a decision to handle said encountered decision; and

receiving said requested decision.

20. The computer program product as recited in claim 17, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by said installer program then the computer program product further comprises the programming step of:

handling said encountered decision automatically.

21. The computer program product as recited in claim 17 further comprising the programming step of:

receiving a response from a decision maker to handle said encountered decision.

22. The computer program product as recited in claim 21 further comprising the programming step of:

reconfiguring said installer program in response to said received response from said decision maker.

23. A system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory unit coupled to said processor, wherein said memory unit is operable for storing a computer program for allowing multiple decisions to be made by multiple decision makers during software installation;

wherein said processor, responsive to said computer program, comprises;

circuitry for compiling a configuration file into executable code, wherein said configuration file contains designated decision makers for each decision to be made during an installation process; and

circuitry for embedding said executable code into an installer program.

24. The system as recited in claim 23, wherein said processor further comprises:

circuitry for detecting one or more previously installed applications.

25. The system as recited in claim 24, wherein said processor further comprises:

circuitry for determining if there are any conflicts between a program to be installed and said one or more detected applications.

26. The system as recited in claim 25, wherein if there is a conflict between said program to be installed and said one or more detected applications then said processor further comprises:

circuitry for determining an appropriate conflict resolution.

27. The system as recited in claim 25, wherein if there is a conflict between said program to be installed and said one or more detected applications then said processor further comprises:

circuitry for providing a decision maker with an option to continue said installation process.

28. The system as recited in claim 23, wherein said processor further comprises:

circuitry for encountering a decision to be made.

29. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by a user then said processor further comprises:

circuitry for displaying a user interface image requesting a decision to handle said encountered decision; and

circuitry for receiving said requested decision.

30. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by a software program then said processor further comprises:

circuitry for transmitting a request for a decision to handle said encountered decision; and

circuitry for receiving said requested decision.

31. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein if said encountered decision is to be made by said installer program then said processor further comprises:

circuitry for handling said encountered decision automatically.

32. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein said processor further comprises:

circuitry for receiving a response from a decision maker to handle said encountered decision.

33. The system as recited in claim 32, wherein said processor further comprises:

circuitry for reconfiguring said installer program in response to said received response from said decision maker.