Computer system and process for aiding in an outsourcing environment

• US 20060089943A1
• Filed: 10/25/2004
• Published: 04/27/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 10/25/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: NTT Data Services Corporation (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Perot Systems Corporation (Dell Technologies Inc.)
• Inventors: Wyman, Richard, Bengfort, Joe R., Creel, Christopher
• Application Number:
  US10/973,111
• Publication Number:
  US 20060089943A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

A method for utilizing an enterprise description language for describing outsourcing arrangements is disclosed. Also disclosed is an exemplary enterprise description language for implementing embodiments of the present invention. This Abstract is provided to comply with rules requiring an Abstract that allows a searcher or other reader to quickly ascertain subject matter of the technical disclosure. This Abstract is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. 37 CFR 1.72(b).

Claims

1. A system for aiding in an outsourcing environment, the system comprising:

an enterprise description language for describing outsourcing arrangements; and

a knowledge repository for storing modules related to the outsourcing arrangements and storing data related to relationships between the modules.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

means for creating relationships between the modules.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

means for enabling an iteration of the enterprise description language.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the modules comprise at least one of a solution module, architecture module, information module, operations module, compliance module, strategy module, finance module, users and usage module, workflow module, business module, and change management module.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the solution module represents an amalgamation of solutions employed to execute an organization'"'"'s activities in accordance with specified requirements.

6. The system of claim 4, wherein the change module categorizes concepts that involve a change within an organization.

7. The system of claim 4, wherein the strategy module defines a direction that an organization intends to take.

8. The system of claim 4, wherein the change management module describes changes between a current direction of an organization and a desired direction of the organization.

9. The system of claim 4, wherein the finance module describes revenue gained and money consumed by conducting business at an organization.

10. The system of claim 4, wherein the information module represents data an organization uses to conduct business and relationships that exist between various data and systems of record.

11. The system of claim 4, wherein the compliance module describes dimensions of definition that cut across a plurality of items within the enterprise description language.

12. The system of claim 4, wherein the workflow module combines business processes and business process activities that enable features and deliver on functions.

13. The system of claim 4, wherein the business module lays out a business and support functions of an organization and capabilities of the organization that realize the business and support functions.

14. The system of claim 4, wherein the operations module describes a portion of the enterprise description language that details a set of products that enable delivery of business activities.

15. The system of claim 4, wherein the architecture module describes a logical layer and a physical layer that supports business processes of an organization.

16. The system of claim 4, wherein the users and usage module comprises at least one of a business unit director module, application developer module, chief information officer module, chief financial officer module, chief operations officer module, chief technology officer module, data architect module, project manager officer module, project manager module, quality assurance director module, and vendor module.

17. A method for implementing an enterprise description language, the method comprising the steps of:

correlating client needs to business and technical environment uses within an organization;

enacting an iteration of the enterprise description language;

designing organization segments and related elements according to the iteration; and

building organization segments and related elements according to the iteration.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the step of organizing iterations of the enterprise description language from more critical to less critical in nature

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the step of correlating further comprises reviewing the business and technical environment uses.

20. The method of claim 17, further comprises the step of forming an iteration vision and set of deliverables.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein the iteration vision and set of deliverables are formed from the organization segments, the related elements, and the building organization segments.

22. The method of claim 17, further comprises the step of generating at least one report regarding the organization elements.

23. The method of claim 22, further comprising the step of:

correlating the at least one report to the client needs; and

weighing the at least one report in view of an iteration vision and set of deliverables.

24. The method of claim 17, further comprising the steps of:

determining if an additional iteration is necessary; and

enacting the additional iteration if it is determined that the additional iteration is necessary.

25. A system for implementing an enterprise description language, the system comprising:

means for correlating client needs to business and technical environment uses within an organization;

means for enacting an iteration of the enterprise description language;

means for designing organization segments and related elements according to the iteration; and

means for building organization segments and related elements according to the iteration.

26. The system of claim 25, further comprises means for organizing iterations of the enterprise description language from more critical to less critical in nature.

27. The system of claim 25, wherein the means for correlating further comprises means for reviewing the business and technical environment uses.

28. The system of claim 25, further comprises means for forming an iteration vision and set of deliverables.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the iteration vision and set of deliverables are formed from the organization segments, the related elements and the building organization segments.

30. The system of claim 25, further comprises means for generating at least one report regarding the regarding the organization elements.

31. The system of claim 30, further comprising:

means for correlating the at least one report to the client needs; and

means for weighing the at least one report in view of an iteration vision and set of deliverables.

32. The system of claim 25, further comprising:

means for determining if an additional iteration is necessary; and

means for enacting the additional iteration if it is determined that the additional iteration is necessary.