Employee recruiting systems and methods

• US 20060100919A1
• Filed: 05/23/2003
• Published: 05/11/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 05/24/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Paul A. Levine
• Original Assignee: Paul A. Levine
• Inventors: Levine, Paul A
• Application Number:
  US10/515,707
• Publication Number:
  US 20060100919A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/11
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063112 Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06398 Performance of employee with respect to a job function
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/08 Auctions

Abstract

Methods and systems for employment recruiting are provided. In one aspect, a remote call center is used to make initial contact with the candidates to obtain information regarding their placeability and urgency in changing jobs, and to provide an initial screening (107), and a local candidate specialist may then personally interview the candidate. In another aspect, compensation is set for recruiters by adjusting a base compensation based on individual and group performance. In another aspect, candidates are assigned to candidate specialists, and client employers are assigned to client specialists. In another aspect, job candidates and job openings are independently obtained so that candidates will be available immediately to fill the openings. In another aspect, in a team-oriented method of matching candidates with jobs, candidates are matched to jobs by corporation among candidate specialists and client specialists. In another aspect, candidates are matched with jobs using candidate and employer ratings.

Claims

1. A system for matching job candidates to jobs, comprising:

a computer readable medium for storing;

(a) candidate information, including names of job candidates, historical information, a potential candidate'"'"'s interest in leaving a current job, and at least one of requirements and preference criteria of a potential candidate, and (b) job information;

wherein;

an employment recruiter is assigned to a candidate whose name is stored based at least partially on evaluation information stored for that candidate;

the candidate information and job information is accessed from the computer readable medium or mediums with the aid of a computer to determine potential matches; and

an employment recruiter selects a job for consideration by a potential candidate to whom the recruiter has been assigned.

2. A telecommunications system for use by an employment recruiting organization, comprising:

a first telecommunications apparatus at a first facility at a location that is local with respect to a job market;

wherein the first telecommunications apparatus is operatively coupled to a telephone communications system providing at least one telephone number either local with respect to the location of a job market or toll-free, and the first facility has a staff including employment recruiters;

a second telecommunications apparatus at a second facility at a location that is remote with respect to the job market;

wherein the second telecommunications apparatus is operatively coupled to the telephone communications system, and the second facility has a staff including telemarketers;

wherein the first and second telecommunications apparatuses employ a call forwarding feature of the telephone communications system to forward calls to the at least one telephone number of the first facility to the second facility for answering by a telemarketer at the second facility.

3. A telecommunications facility for use by an employment recruiting organization, comprising:

a first telecommunications apparatus at a first facility at a location that is local with respect to a job market;

wherein the first telecommunications apparatus is operatively coupled to a telephone communications system providing at least one telephone number either local with respect to the location of a job market or toll-free, and the first facility has a staff including employment recruiters;

a second telecommunications apparatus at a second facility at a location that is remote with respect to the job market;

wherein the second telecommunications apparatus is operatively coupled to the telephone communications system, and the second facility has a staff including telemarketers;

wherein the first and second telecommunications apparatuses employ a call identification feature of the telephone communications system which indicates to a potential job candidate called by a telemarketer at the second facility the at least one telephone number of the first facility.

4. A system for use by an employment recruiting organization in setting compensation for each employment recruiter of a group of employment recruiters providing employment services, comprising:

a storage medium for storing;

(a) data that indicates a base compensation and a performance goal for a particular function or set of functions for each recruiter in the group of recruiters, (b) data that indicates an actual performance of a particular recruiter, and (c) data that indicates an actual performance of the group; and

a processor adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to determine an actual compensation for the particular recruiter according to the base compensation of the particular recruiter, the actual performance of the particular recruiter, and the actual performance of the group.

5. The system of claim 4, further comprising:

at least one user computer-implemented interface for receiving an operator input for storing data in the storage medium, and for presenting the actual compensation.

6. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular recruiter and the actual performance of the group are measured over a predetermined time period.

7. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular recruiter is measured based on a revenue derived from the particular recruiter, and the actual performance of the group is measured based on a revenue derived from the group.

8. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular recruiter is measured based on a number of job candidates placed in jobs by the particular recruiter, and the performance of the group is measured based on a number of job candidates placed in jobs by the group.

9. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual compensation is determined by adjusting the base compensation according to the actual performance of the group to obtain a group-adjusted compensation, and adjusting the group-adjusted compensation according to the actual performance of the particular recruiter.

10. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual compensation is determined by adjusting the base compensation according to the actual performance of the particular recruiter to obtain an individual-adjusted compensation, and adjusting the individual-adjusted compensation according to the actual performance of the group.

11. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual compensation is determined by adjusting the base compensation according to the actual performance of the particular recruiter, and adjusting the base compensation according to the actual performance of the group.

12. The system of claim 4, wherein:

an actual performance of each respective recruiter in the group is measured; and

an actual compensation for each respective recruiter is determined according to the base compensation thereof, an actual performance thereof, and the actual performance of the group.

13. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular recruiter is measured based on how quickly job candidates are placed in jobs by particular recruiters.

14. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular recruiter is measured based on compensation of jobs in which job candidates are placed by the particular recruiter.

15. The system of claim 4, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular recruiter is measured based on a evaluation of employers at which the job candidates are placed by the particular recruiter, such that actual performance of the particular recruiter is determined to be higher when a candidate is placed at a higher evaluation employer.

16. A system of setting compensation for each individual, of a group, performing a service resulting from the contribution or contributions of one or more individuals in the group, comprising:

a storage medium for storing;

(a) data that indicates a base compensation and a performance goal for a particular function or set of functions for each individual in the group;

(b) data that indicates a performance goal for the group;

(c) data that indicates an actual performance of the particular individual; and

(d) data that indicates an actual performance of the group; and

a processor adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to determine an actual compensation for the particular individual according to the base compensation of the particular individual, an actual performance of the particular individual, and an actual performance of the group.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the actual performance of the, particular individual and the actual performance of the group are measured over a predetermined time period.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the actual performance of the particular individual is measured based on a revenue derived from the particular individual'"'"'s contribution to the services, and the actual performance of the group is measured based on a revenue derived from the group'"'"'s services.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the actual compensation is determined by adjusting the base compensation according to an actual performance of the group to obtain a group-adjusted compensation, and adjusting the group-adjusted compensation according to the actual performance of the individual.

20. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the actual compensation is determined by adjusting the base compensation according to an actual performance of the particular individual to obtain an individual-adjusted compensation, and adjusting the individual-adjusted compensation according to the actual performance of the group.

21. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the actual compensation is determined by adjusting the base compensation according to an actual performance of the particular individual and adjusting the base compensation according to the actual performance of the group.

22. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the service performed by the individuals comprise employment recruiting, and the actual performance of the particular individual is measured based on how quickly job candidates are placed in jobs by the particular individual.

23. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the service performed by the individuals comprise employment recruiting, and the actual performance of the particular individual is measured based on compensation of jobs in which job candidates are placed by the particular individual.

24. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the service performed by the individuals comprise employment recruiting, and the actual performance of the particular individual is measured based on a evaluation of employers at which the job candidates are placed by the particular individual, such that actual performance of the particular individual is determined to be higher when a candidate is placed at a higher evaluation employer.

25. The system of claim 16, wherein:

the group of individuals comprise a plurality of candidate specialists and a plurality of client specialist, each performing a divisible portion of employment recruiting.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein:

the divisible portion of employment recruiting comprises obtaining job candidates for employment recruiting;

the actual performance of a particular candidate specialist is measured based on a number of job candidates placed in jobs by the particular candidate specialist; and

the performance of the group is measured based on a number of job andidates placed in jobs by the group.

27. The system of claim 25, wherein:

the divisible portion of employment recruiting comprises obtaining jobs for employment recruiting;

the actual performance of a particular client specialist is measured based on a number of job candidates placed in jobs by the particular client specialist; and

the performance of the group is measured based on a number of job candidates placed in jobs by the group.

28. A system for assigning job candidates to recruiters in a group of recruiters, comprising:

a storage medium for storing data indicative of evaluations of the job candidates, and data indicative of evaluations of the recruiters in the group; and

a processor, adapted to access the storage medium, for executing instructions to assign the job candidates to a respective selected one of the recruiters according to a correspondence between the job candidate'"'"'s evaluation and the selected recruiter'"'"'s evaluation.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the job candidates are evaluated on a scale that accounts for a degree of placeability.

30. The system of claim 29, wherein:

the placeability accounts for at least one of;

experience, education, time at current company, frequency of job changes, and level at current job.

31. The system of claim 29, wherein:

the job candidates are evaluated on a scale that accounts for a degree of urgency in finding a new job.

32. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the recruiters are evaluated according to their track records in placing job candidates.

33. The system of claim 32, wherein:

the recruiters are evaluated according to an amount of revenue derived from their services in placing job candidates.

34. The system of claim 32, wherein:

the recruiters are evaluated according to how quickly they are able to place job candidates.

35. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the job candidates are assignee to a respective one of the recruiters according to a correspondence between the job candidate evaluation and the recruiter evaluation, such that more highly evaluated job candidates are assigned to more highly evaluated recruiters.

36. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the job candidates are assigned to a respective one of the recruiters according to a correspondence between the job candidate evaluation and the recruiter evaluation, such that job candidates with the same evaluation are cyclically assigned to recruiters.

37. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the job candidates to another selected one of the recruiters when the recruiter previously selected therefor is unable to place the job candidates within a give time period.

38. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the job candidate to the recruiter that obtained the job candidate, and assign the job candidate to another selected one of the recruiters when the recruiter previously selected therefor is unable to place the job candidate within a give time period.

39. The system of claim 28, wherein:

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign job candidates whose previous assignment expired to the recruiter that selects the unassigned job candidates from a group of job candidates.

40. The system of claim 39, wherein:

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the job candidates to another selected one of the recruiters when the recruiter that previously selected the job candidate is unable to place the job candidate within a give time period.

41. A system for use in employment recruiting, comprising:

a storage medium for storing data identifying a pool of job candidates, and data identifying a pool of available jobs from associated employers;

wherein the pool of available jobs from associated employers is obtained independently of the obtaining of the pool of job candidates.

42. The system of claim 41, further comprising:

at least a first computer-implemented user interface for receiving an operator input for storing the data identifying the pool of job candidates in the storage medium; and

at least a second computer-implemented user interface for receiving an operator input for storing the data identifying the pool of available jobs in the storage medium.

43. The system of claim 42, wherein:

the interfaces communicate with the storage medium via at least one network; and

at least one of the interfaces is remote from the storage medium.

44. The system of claim 42, wherein:

the operator associated with the first user interface is a candidate specialist or telemarketer.

45. The system of claim 42, wherein:

the operator associated with the second user interface is a client specialist or telemarketer.

46. The system of claim 41, wherein the storage medium stores data indicative of predetermined criteria provided by the job candidates and the employers;

further comprising;

a processor, adapted to access the storage medium, for executing instructions to match the job candidates with the available jobs in accordance with the criteria

47. The system of claim 46, wherein:

the criteria provided by the job candidates includes at least one of;

a desired position, salary, location, and urgency for a new position.

48. The system of claim 46, wherein:

the criteria provided by the employers includes at least one of;

a desired education, experience, time at current company, frequency of job changes, and level at the job candidate'"'"'s current or previous job.

49. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the storage medium stores data indicating evaluations of the employers and of respective client specialists in a group of client specialists;

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the available jobs of each of the employers to respective ones of the client specialists according to a correspondence between their evaluations such that more highly evaluated employers are assigned to more highly evaluated client specialists.

50. The system of claim 49, wherein:

the client specialists are evaluated according to their track records in filling available jobs.

51. The system of claim 49, wherein:

the client specialist are evaluated according to an amount of revenue derived from their services in filling available jobs.

52. The system of claim 49, wherein:

the client specialists are evaluated according to how quickly they are able to fill available jobs.

53. The system of claim 49, wherein:

the respective employers are evaluated according to an amount of fees they pay to fill their respective available jobs.

54. The system of claim 49, wherein:

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the available jobs of at least a selected one of the employers to another selected one of the client specialists when the client specialist previously selected therefor is unable to fill the available jobs of the selected employer within a given time period.

55. The system of claim 41, wherein:

the storage medium stores data indicating evaluations of the job candidates and of respective candidate specialists in a group of candid specialists and

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the available job candidates to respective selected candidate specialists according to a correspondence between their respective evaluations, such that more highly evaluated job candidates are assigned to more highly evaluated candidate specialists.

56. The system of claim 55, wherein:

the candidate specialists are evaluated according to their track records in filling available jobs.

57. The system of claim 55, wherein:

the candidate specialists are evaluated according to an amount of revenue derived from their services in filling available jobs.

58. The system of claim 55, wherein:

the candidate specialists are evaluated according to how quickly they are able to fill available jobs.

59. The system of claim 55, wherein:

the respective employers are evaluated according to an amount of fees they pay to fill their respective available jobs.

60. The system of claim 55, wherein:

the processor is adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign the available job candidates to another selected one of the candidate specialists when the candidate specialist previously selected therefor is unable to place the candidate within a given time period.

61. A system for matching job candidates with available jobs, comprising:

the storage medium for storing data regarding a pool of job candidates and a pool of available jobs from associated employers,

respective computer-implemented interfaces for use by respective candidate specialists to which the job candidates are assigned, and respective client specialists to which the employers are assigned; and

a processor, adapted to access the storage medium, for executing instructions for use in matching at least a particular one of the job candidates in a pool of job candidates to at least a particular one of available jobs in a pool of available jobs from associated employers in a cooperative effort between at least one of;

(a) the candidate specialists, (b) the client specialists, and (c) the candidate specialists and the client specialists.

62. The system of claim 61, wherein:

for the cooperative effort between candidate specialists, a candidate specialist suggests to another candidate specialist to which a particular job candidate is assigned, via their respective interfaces, particular ones of the available jobs which are believed to be suitable for the particular job candidate.

63. The system of claim 61, wherein:

for the cooperative effort between client specialists, a client specialist suggests to another client specialist to which a particular employer is assigned, via their respective interfaces, particular ones of the available job candidates which are believed to be suitable for the respective available jobs of the particular employer.

64. The system of claim 61, wherein:

for the cooperative effort between the candidate specialists and the client specialists, a client specialist suggests to a candidate specialist to which a particular job candidate is assigned, via their respective interfaces, particular ones of the available jobs which are believed to be suitable for the particular job candidate, and a candidate specialist suggests to a client specialist to which a particular employer is assigned, via their respective interfaces, particular ones of the available job candidates which are believed to be suitable for the respective available jobs of the particular employer.

65. A system for matching job candidates with available jobs, comprising:

a storage medium for storing data obtained by evaluation the job candidate, and by evaluation employers with respective available jobs; and

a processor adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to match to the job candidates to the available jobs according to a correspondence between the job candidate'"'"'s evaluation and the employer'"'"'s evaluation.

66. The system of claim 65, wherein:

the job candidates are evaluated on a scale that accounts for a degree of placeability.

67. The system of claim 66, wherein placeability accounts for at least one of:

experience, education, time at current company, frequency of job changes, and level at current job.

68. The system of claim 65, wherein:

the job candidates are evaluated on a scale that accounts for a degree of urgency in finding a new job.

69. The system of claim 65, wherein:

the employers are evaluated on a scale that accounts for the amount of jobs associated with the particular employer out of a total number of jobs of the pool of available jobs.

70. The system of claim 65, wherein:

the employers are evaluated on a scale that accounts for the amount of jobs associated with the particular employer out of a total number of jobs of the pool of available jobs for a predetermined time period.

71. The system of claim 65, wherein:

each of the employers is evaluated on a scale that accounts for the amount of revenue provided thereby in a predetermined time period.

72. A system of matching job candidates in a pool of job candidates with available jobs in a pool of available jobs, comprising:

a storage medium for storing data obtained by;

(a) evaluation the job candidate at least on one of;

(a1) a scale that accounts for a degree of placeability, and (a2) a scale that accounts for a degree of urgency in finding a new job, and (b) evaluation employers with respective available jobs by accounting for the amount of jobs associated with the particular employer out of a total number of jobs of the pool of available jobs for a predetermined time period;

a processor adapted to access the storage medium and execute instructions to assign at least a particular job candidate of the pool of job candidates to a particular recruiter in a group of recruiters, and to match the job candidates to the available jobs according to a correspondence between the job candidate'"'"'s evaluation and the employer'"'"'s evaluation.