Physiological assessment system and method

• US 20060116556A1
• Filed: 11/29/2004
• Published: 06/01/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 11/29/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Paul Duhamel
• Original Assignee: Paul Duhamel
• Inventors: Duhamel, Paul
• Application Number:
  US10/999,167
• Publication Number:
  US 20060116556A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/300
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/377 using evoked responses
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/383 Somatosensory stimuli, e.g. electric stimulation
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4824 Touch or pain perception evaluation A61B5/4821 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/726 using Wavelet transforms

Abstract

A system and method for physiological assessment utilizes electrophysiological techniques, such as evoked potential (EP) data. Symptomatic and asymptomatic sensory areas are stimulated and EP data are collected. Artifacts can optionally be deleted from the raw EP data, which can then be appropriately filtered and transformed using software filtering and signal processing transformation techniques. Points of interest are detected and labeled on the resulting traces, which are output for analysis, diagnosis and treatment purposes. Differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic EPs provide objective, quantitative, repeatable information about pathological conditions.

Claims

1. A electrophysiological assessment method of the type useable to assess a physiological condition, the electrophysiological assessment method comprising the steps of:

(A) collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of an asymptomatic sensory area to obtain asymptomatic response data;

(B) collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of an symptomatic sensory area to obtain symptomatic response data; and

(C) comparing the symptomatic response data to the asymptomatic response data to assess a physiological condition.

2. The method of claim 1, the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data to the symptomatic response data comprising analyzing a first data element comprising a latency.

3. The method of claim 2, the step of comparing the asymptomatic data to the symptomatic data further comprising analyzing a second data element associated with the first latency.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the second data element comprises a response amplitude signal component.

5. The method of claim 1, the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data to the symptomatic response data comprising analyzing a first data element comprising a response amplitude signal component.

6. The method of claim 7, the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data to the symptomatic response data further comprising analyzing a second data element associated with the first data element.

7. The method of claim 1, the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data to the symptomatic response data comprising determining the difference between an amplitude of the asymptomatic response data at a first latency to an amplitude of the symptomatic response data at the first latency.

8. The method of claim 1, the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data to the symptomatic response data comprising determining at least one inflection point for the symptomatic response data and the asymptomatic response data and comparing the at least one inflection point of the asymptomatic response data to the at least one inflection point of the symptomatic response data.

9. The method of claim 1, the step of comparing the asymptomatic data to the symptomatic data comprising determining at least a first inflection point for the asymptomatic response data and at least a second inflection point for the symptomatic response data and comparing the amplitude and latency of the first and second inflections points.

10. The method of claim 1, the step of collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of the asymptomatic sensory area comprising stimulating the asymptomatic sensory area and recording the resulting physiological response.

11. The method of claim 1, the step of collecting the at least one electrophysiological signal of the symptomatic sensory area comprising stimulating the symptomatic sensory area and recording the resulting physiological response.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrophysiological assessment method measures a somatosensory condition.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the somatosensory condition comprises pain.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrophysiological method is used to confirm the presence or absence of a somatosensory condition.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the somatosensory condition comprises pain.

16. The method of claim 1, the step of collecting the at least one electrophysiological signal of an asymptomatic sensory area and collecting the at least one electrophysiological signal of a symptomatic sensory area comprising using electroencephalogram equipment.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of an asymptomatic sensory area occurs at a first time during a first experiment and the step of collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of a symptomatic sensory area occurs at a second time during a second experiment, the second time being remote from the first time.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of a symptomatic sensory area occurs at substantially the same time as the step of collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of an asymptomatic sensory area.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein the electrophysiological signal comprises an evoked potential technique.

20. The method of claim 1, further comprising prescribing medical treatment based at least in part on the assessed physiological condition.

21. The method of claim 1, further comprising evaluating the efficacy of a substance based at least in part on the assessed physiological condition.

22. The method of claim 1, further comprising comparing the asymptomatic response data and symptomatic response data to subjective data relating to the physiological condition.

23. The method of claim 22, further comprising scaling the asymptomatic response data, symptomatic response data, and subjective data to a common scale prior to comparing the asymptomatic response data, symptomatic response data, and subjective data.

24. The method of claim 22, further comprising acquiring subjective data.

25. The method of claim 22 wherein the subjective data comprises self-reports of pain.

26. A physiological assessment method of the type useable to assess a physiological condition, the physiological assessment method comprising the steps of:

(A) measuring at least a first electrophysiological signal of asymptomatic tissue comprising the steps of;

(a) attaching a stimulus unit to an asymptomatic sensory area;

(b) stimulating the asymptomatic sensory area; and

(c) collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of the asymptomatic sensory area to obtain first asymptomatic response data;

(B) measuring at least a first electrophysiological signal of symptomatic tissue comprising the steps of;

(a) attaching a stimulus unit to a symptomatic sensory area;

(b) stimulating the symptomatic sensory area;

(c) waiting for a predetermined time period; and

(d) collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of the symptomatic sensory area to obtain first symptomatic response data.

27. The method of claim 26, further comprising:

(A) obtaining subjective data concerning a physiological condition; and

(B) comparing the asymptomatic response data, the symptomatic response data, and the subjective data to assess a physiological condition.

28. The method of claim 27, further comprising, prior to the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data, the symptomatic response data, and the subjective data, scaling the asymptomatic response data to a first scale, scaling the symptomatic response data to a second scale, and scaling the subjective data to a third scale.

29. The method of claim 28, wherein the first scale, second scale, and third scale are the same.

30. The method of claim 27, the subjective data comprising self-reported observations of the physiological condition.

31. The method of claim 30, the self-reported observations of the physiological conditions comprising self reported feelings of pain.

32. The method of claim 27, wherein the subjective data, asymptomatic response data and the symptomatic response data are acquired at substantially the same time.

33. The method of claim 26, further comprising:

(A) collecting second asymptomatic data, second symptomatic data, and second subjective data; and

(B) scaling the first and second subjective data, the first and second asymptomatic response data, and the first and second symptomatic response data by;

(a) assigning a first value to a minimum observed value of a first data element associated with the first or second symptomatic response data,

(b) assigning the first value to a minimum observed value of a second data element associated with the first or second asymptomatic response data; and

(c) assigning the first value to a minimum value of a third data element associated with the first or second subjective data.

34. The method of claim 33, the step of scaling the subjective data, the asymptomatic response data, and the symptomatic response data further comprising:

(A) assigning a second value to a maximum observed value of a fourth data element associated with the first or second symptomatic response data;

(B) assigning the second value to a maximum observed value of a fifth data element associated with the first or second asymptomatic response data; and

(C) assigning the second value to maximum value of a sixth data element associated with the first or second subjective data.

35. The method of claim 34, further comprising scaling the subjective data, the asymptomatic response data, and the symptomatic response data between the first value and the second value.

36. The method of claim 26, the step of comparing the asymptomatic response data to the symptomatic response data to assess a physiological condition comprising comparing the amplitude of an inflection point associated with the asymptomatic response data to the amplitude of an inflection point associated with the symptomatic response data.

37. The method of claim 26 wherein the physiological condition comprises a somatosensory condition.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the somatosensory condition comprises pain.

39. The method of claim 26, wherein the step of collecting at least one electrophysiological signal of the symptomatic sensory area occurs at substantially the same time as the step of measuring the electrophysiological signal of the asymptomatic sensory area.

40. The method of claim 26, further comprising comparing the asymptomatic data to the symptomatic data to confirm the presence or absence of a physiological condition.

41. The method of claim 40, wherein the physiological condition comprises pain.

42. The method of claim 26, further comprising comparing the asymptomatic data to the symptomatic data to assess a physiological condition.

43. A method for measuring the attenuation of a somatosensory condition comprising:

(A) using an electrophysiological technique to obtain somatosensory asymptomatic response data from an asymptomatic sensory area;

(B) using an electrophysiological technique to obtain somatosensory symptomatic response data from a symptomatic sensory area;

(C) normalizing the symptomatic response data and the asymptomatic response data;

(D) normalizing subjective data; and

(E) determining the attenuation of a somatosensory condition by comparing the normalized asymptomatic data, the normalized symptomatic data, and the normalized subjective data.

44. The method of claim 43, wherein the electrophysiological technique comprises an evoked potential technique.

45. The method of claim 43, wherein the somatosensory condition comprises pain.

46. The method of claim 43, further comprising acquiring subjective response data.

47. The method of claim 46, wherein the step of acquiring at least a portion of the subjective response data occurs at substantially the same time as the step of using an electrophysiological technique to obtain somatosensory asymptomatic response data from an asymptomatic sensory area and the step of using an electrophysiological technique to obtain somatosensory symptomatic response data from a symptomatic sensory area.

48. The method of claim 46, wherein the step of acquiring subjective response data comprises filling out a self evaluation form.

49. The method claim 43, wherein the step of normalizing the symptomatic response data and the asymptomatic response data comprises:

(A) assigning a maximum value to a data element associated with the symptomatic response data and to a data element associated with the asymptomatic response data;

(B) assigning a minimum value to a data element associated with the symptomatic response data and to a data element associated with the asymptomatic response data; and

(C) normalizing remaining data elements associated with the symptomatic response data and the asymptomatic response data between the maximum value and the minimum value.

50. The method of claim 49, further comprising:

(A) assigning the maximum value to a data element associated with the subjective data;

(B) assigning the minimum value to a data element associated with the subjective data; and

(C) normalizing remaining data elements associated with the subjective data between the maximum value and the minimum value.