Models for monitoring of streaming server performance

• US 20060136927A1
• Filed: 12/16/2004
• Published: 06/22/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 12/16/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Roy, Sumit, Spasojevic, Mirjana, Bhatti, Nina, Covell, Michele, Kontothanassis, Leonidas, Seo, Beomjoo
• Application Number:
  US11/016,476
• Publication Number:
  US 20060136927A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 718/105
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0817 by checking functioning
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0829 Packet loss
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/12 Network monitoring probes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/16 Threshold monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 65/1101 Session protocols
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 65/80 Responding to QoS

Abstract

Methods and systems thereof for monitoring a streaming media server are described. Calibration data for the server is used to identify a server resource that reaches its respective limit before other server resources reach their respective limits as loads on the server are increased. The calibration data characterizes usage of the server'"'"'s resources under a plurality of different loads including a saturation load. The saturation load causes the server to fail to satisfy a predefined quality-of-service criterion. The server resource is monitored to determine whether the server is approaching the saturation load with the server in service in a content delivery network.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring a streaming media server, said method comprising:

using calibration data for said server to identify a server resource that reaches its respective limit before other server resources reach their respective limits as loads on said server are increased, said calibration data characterizing usage of said server'"'"'s resources under a plurality of different loads including a saturation load, wherein said saturation load causes said server to fail to satisfy a predefined quality-of-service criterion; and

monitoring said server resource to determine whether said server is approaching said saturation load with said server in service in a content delivery network.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of different loads comprises different sizes of loads less than or equal to said saturation load.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said plurality of different loads comprises different types of loads, wherein a type of load is characterized according to whether or not multiple clients are requesting said content, an encoding bitrate of said content, and whether said content is live or recorded, wherein associated with each of said different types of loads is a respective saturation load and a server resource that reached its limit at said respective saturation load.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said calibration data also characterizes said server'"'"'s responses to client requests.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said server resource is selected from the group consisting of:

interrupt rate;

context-switching rate;

time running non-kernel code;

time running kernel code;

idle time;

load average over a prescribed time interval;

incoming packet rate;

outgoing packet rate;

disk-read-access rate;

disk-sector-read rate;

disk-write-access rate; and

disk-sector-write rate.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising causing a client to introduce a request to said server, wherein a quantifiable characteristic of said server'"'"'s reply to said request is measured at said client.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said quantifiable characteristic is selected from the group consisting of:

amount of time between a time at which a command to said server is issued by said client and a time at which a packet associated with said command is received by said client;

rate at which data is received; and

packet-loss rate.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein said monitoring is performed without a count of the number of clients served by said server.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising using said monitoring to determine whether said server can admit a new client.

10. A system for monitoring a streaming media server, said system comprising:

a subsystem for monitoring a server resource with said server in service in a content delivery network, said server resource identified from calibration data that characterizes usage of said server'"'"'s resources under a plurality of different loads including a saturation load, wherein said saturation load is a load that causes said server to fail to satisfy a pre-defined quality-of-service criterion, said server resource reaching its respective limit before others of said server'"'"'s resources reach their respective limits as server load is increased; and

a subsystem for using a value of said server resource to determine whether said server is approaching said saturation load.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein said plurality of different loads comprises different sizes of loads less than or equal to said saturation load.

12. The system of claim 10 wherein said plurality of different loads comprises different types of loads, wherein a type of load is characterized according to whether or not multiple clients are requesting said content, an encoding bitrate of said content, and whether said content is live or recorded, wherein associated with each of said different types of loads is a respective saturation load and a server resource that reached its limit at said respective saturation load.

13. The system of claim 10 wherein said calibration data also characterizes said server'"'"'s responses to client requests.

14. The system of claim 10 wherein said server resource is selected from the group consisting of:

interrupt rate;

context-switching rate;

time running non-kernel code;

time running kernel code;

idle time;

load average over a prescribed time interval;

incoming packet rate;

outgoing packet rate;

disk-read-access rate;

disk-sector-read rate;

disk-write-access rate; and

disk-sector-write rate.

15. The system of claim 10 further comprising a subsystem that causes a client to introduce a request to said server, wherein a quantifiable characteristic of said server'"'"'s reply to said request is measured at said client.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein said quantifiable characteristic is selected from the group consisting of:

amount of time between a time at which a command to said server is issued by said client and a time at which a packet associated with said command is received by said client;

rate at which data is received; and

packet-loss rate.

17. The system of claim 10 using said value of said server resource is also used to determine whether said server can admit a new client.

18. A computer-usable medium having computer readable code stored thereon for causing a device to perform a method of monitoring a streaming media server, said method comprising:

accessing calibration data for said server, said calibration data characterizing usage of said server'"'"'s resources under a plurality of different loads including a saturation load, wherein said saturation load causes said server to fail to satisfy a predefined quality-of-service criterion;

using said calibration data to identify a server resource that reaches its respective limit before the others of said server'"'"'s resources reach their respective limits as said different loads are increased; and

monitoring said server resource to determine whether said server is approaching said saturation load with said server in service in a content delivery network.

19. The computer-usable medium of claim 18 wherein said plurality of different loads comprises different sizes of loads less than or equal to said saturation load.

20. The computer-usable medium of claim 18 wherein said plurality of different loads comprises different types of loads, wherein a type of load is characterized according to whether or not multiple clients are requesting said content, an encoding bitrate of said content, and whether said content is live or recorded, wherein associated with each of said different types of loads is a respective saturation load and a server resource that reached its limit at said respective saturation load.

21. The computer-usable medium of claim 18 wherein said calibration data also characterizes said server'"'"'s responses to client requests.

22. The computer-usable medium of claim 18 wherein said server resource is selected from the group consisting of:

interrupt rate;

context-switching rate;

time running non-kernel code;

time running kernel code;

idle time;

load average over a prescribed time interval;

incoming packet rate;

outgoing packet rate;

disk-read-access rate;

disk-sector-read rate;

disk-write-access rate; and

disk-sector-write rate.

23. The computer-usable medium of claim 18 wherein said computer-readable program code embodied therein causes said device to perform said method further comprising causing a client to introduce a request to said server, wherein a quantifiable characteristic of said server'"'"'s reply to said request is measured at said client.

24. The computer-usable medium of claim 23 wherein said quantifiable characteristic is selected from the group consisting of:

amount of time between a time at which a command to said server is issued by said client and a time at which a packet associated with said command is received by said client;

rate at which data is received; and

packet-loss rate.

25. The computer-usable medium of claim 18 wherein said computer-readable program code embodied therein causes said device to perform said method further comprising using the value of said server resource is also used to determine whether said server can admit a new client.