System and method for maintaining data integrity in a cluster network

• US 20060168228A1
• Filed: 12/21/2004
• Published: 07/27/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 12/21/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Dell Products LP (Dell Technologies Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Dell Products LP (Dell Technologies Inc.)
• Inventors: Vasudevan, Bharath V., Nguyen, Nam V.
• Application Number:
  US11/018,316
• Publication Number:
  US 20060168228A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/226
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/40 for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity, e.g. service redundancy protocols, protocol state redundancy or protocol service redirection management of faults, events, alarms or notifications in data switching networks H04L41/06

Abstract

A system and method for failure recovery and failure management in a cluster network is disclosed. Following a failure of a storage enclosure or a communication link failure between storage enclosures, each server node of the network determines whether the server node can access the drives of each logical unit owned by the server node. If the server node cannot access a set of drives of the logical that include an operational set of data, an alternate server node is queried to determine if the alternate server node can access the a set of drives of the logical unit that include an operational set of data.

Claims

1. A method for failure recovery in a network, comprising the steps of:

identifying a failed storage enclosure of the network;

identifying a logical storage unit owned by a first server node of the network;

identifying the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node;

determining whether the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data;

if the storage drives accessible by the first storage node do not comprise an operational set of data,

identifying the logical unit to an alternate server node;

determining whether the alternate server node can access a set of storage drives of the logical unit that include an operational set of data; and

transferring ownership of the logical unit to the alternate server node if the alternate server node can access a set of storage drives that include an operational set of data of the logical unit.

2. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 1, wherein the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data if (a) the accessible drives comprise the complete set of drives of the logical unit or (b) the accessible drives comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

3. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 2, further comprising the step of rebuilding a drive of the logical unit if (a) the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data, and (b) the accessible drives of the logical unit comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

4. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 1, wherein the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data if (a) the accessible drives of the logical unit comprise the complete set of drives of the logical unit or (b) the accessible drives of the logical unit comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

5. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 4, further comprising the step of rebuilding a drive of the logical unit if (a) the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data, and (b) the accessible drives of the logical unit comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

6. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 1, wherein the data of the logical unit is stored according to a RAID storage methodology.

7. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 1, further comprising the step of, if the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data, writing a confirmatory designation to the drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node to designate the drives as including a master copy of the data of the logical unit.

8. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 1, further comprising the step of, if the storage drives that are accessible by the first server node do not comprise an operational set of data and if the storage drives that are accessible by the alternate server node do comprise an operational set of data, writing a confirmatory designation to the storage drives that are accessible by the alternate server node to designate the drives as including a master copy of the data of the logical unit.

9. A network, comprising:

a first server node;

a second server node;

a first storage enclosure coupled to the first server node, wherein the first storage enclosure includes a plurality of storage drives;

a second storage enclosure coupled to the second server node, wherein the second storage enclosure includes a plurality of storage drives;

an intermediate storage enclosure positioned communicatively between the first storage enclosure and the second storage enclosure such that the intermediate storage enclosure is communicatively coupled to the first storage enclosure and the second storage enclosure, wherein the intermediate storage enclosure includes a plurality of storage drives and wherein each storage drive is accessible to the first server node and the second server node;

wherein the each of the server nodes have logical ownership over one or more logical units comprised of storage drives of the storage enclosures;

wherein, in the event of a failure of a storage enclosure, each server node is operable to,

evaluate, for each logical unit owned by each server node, whether the server node has access to storage drives of the logical unit that comprise an operational set of data; and

for each logical unit owned by the server node, transferring ownership of the logical unit to the other server node if the server node does not have access to storage drives of the logical unit that comprise an operational set of data and if the other server node does have access to storage drives of the logical unit that comprise an operational set of data.

10. The network of claim 9, wherein the each logical unit comprises an array of drives to which data is saved according to a RAID storage methodology.

11. The network of claim 9, wherein a set of storage drives accessible by a server node comprise an operational set of data if (a) the accessible drives comprise the complete set of drives of the logical unit or (b) the accessible drives comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

12. The network of claim 11, wherein each server node is further operable to rebuild a drive of the logical unit if (a) the storage drives accessible by the server node comprise an operational set of data, and (b) the accessible drives comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

13. The network of claim 12, wherein each server node is further operable to write a confirmatory designation to each drive of a logical unit following a determination that the server node has access to storage drives of the logical unit that comprise an operational set of data.

14. The network of claim 13, wherein each server node is further operable to mark a logical unit as being offline if neither the server node nor the opposite server node is able to access a set of storage drives of the logical unit that comprise an operational set of data.

15. A method for failure recovery in a network, wherein the network comprises first and second server nodes communicatively coupled to a set of multiple storage enclosures, wherein each of the storage enclosures includes multiple storage drives logically organized into logical storage units, comprising the steps of:

identifying a failed storage enclosure of the network;

identifying a logical storage unit owned by the first server node of the network;

identifying the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node;

determining whether the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node comprise an operational set of data;

if the storage drives accessible by the first storage node do not comprise an operational set of data,

identifying the logical unit to the second server node;

determining whether the second server node can access a set of storage drives of the logical unit that include an operational set of data; and

transferring ownership of the logical unit to the second server node if the second server node can access a set of storage drives of the logical unit that include an operational set of data.

16. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 15, further comprising the step of marking the logical unit as being offline if the storage drives of the logical unit accessible by the first server node and the second server node do not comprise an operational set of data.

17. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 15, further comprising the step of writing a designation to the drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first server node to identify the drives as including a master copy of the data of the logical unit if it is determined that the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first storage node comprise an operational set of data.

18. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 15, further comprising the step of writing a designation to the drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the second server node to identify the drives as including a master copy of the data of the logical unit if it is determined that (a) the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the first storage node do not comprise an operational set of data, and (b) the storage drives of the logical unit that are accessible by the second storage node comprise an operational set of data.

19. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 15, wherein a set of accessible storage drives of a logical unit comprise an operational set of data if (a) the accessible drives of the logical unit comprise the complete set of drives of the logical unit or (b) the accessible drives of the logical unit comprise a set of drives from which a complete set of drives of the logical unit could be derived.

20. The method for failure recovery in a network of claim 15, wherein the data of the storage drives of each logical unit is stored according to a RAID storage methodology.