Method of predicting suitability for a soil engaging operation

• US 20060200334A1
• Filed: 03/07/2005
• Published: 09/07/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 03/07/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Deere & Company
• Original Assignee: Deere & Company
• Inventors: Pickett, Terence Daniel, Stelford, Mark William, Faivre, Steven Michael
• Application Number:
  US11/074,174
• Publication Number:
  US 20060200334A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/22
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202

Abstract

Presented herein is a method for predicting suitable times for performing a soil engaging operation within a field. The method includes the steps of accessing predicted values for weather and soil conditions, and then predicting values for one or more operation variables indicating operation suitability. The method then predicts suitability for performance of the soil engaging operation based on the predicted operation variables and selected suitability parameters.

Claims

1. A method of predicting an operation characteristic at a field node for different points in time, the characteristic indicating suitability for performance of a soil engaging operation, the method comprising the steps of:

accessing values predicted for one or more soil condition at the node;

selecting a predefined soil profile representative of the node;

selecting a predefined operation profile representative of the operation;

determining values for one or more operation characteristic at the node for different points in time using operation characteristic tables giving values relative to soil conditions, soil profile, and operation profile;

displaying values determined for one or more operation characteristic at the node for different points in time.

2. The method described in claim 1, wherein the operation characteristic is soil compaction impact, soil particle size, tractive efficiency, or fuel consumption.

3. The method described in claim 1, further predicting an operation effect at the field node for different points in time, the effect indicating suitability for performance of a soil engaging operation, the method further comprising the steps of:

determining values for one or more operation effect at the node for different points in time using operation effect tables giving values relative to operation characteristics, soil profile, and operation profile;

displaying values determined for one or more operation effect at the node for different points in time.

4. The method described in claim 3, wherein the operation effect is crop yield impact or fuel expense.

5. A method of predicting an operation characteristic at a field node for different points in time, the characteristic indicating suitability for performance of a soil engaging operation, the method comprising the steps of:

accessing values predicted for one or more soil condition at the node;

selecting a predefined soil profile representative of the node;

determining values for one or more soil characteristic at the node for different points in time using soil characteristic tables giving values relative to soil conditions and soil profile;

selecting a predefined operation profile representative of the operation;

determining values for one or more operation characteristic at the node for different points in time using operation characteristic tables giving values relative to soil characteristics, soil profile, and operation profile;

displaying values determined for one or more operation characteristic at the node for different points in time.

6. The method described in claim 5, further comprising the step of displaying values determined for one or more soil characteristic at the node for different points in time

7. The method described in claim 5, wherein the operation characteristic is soil compaction impact, soil particle size, tractive efficiency, or fuel consumption.

8. The method described in claim 5, wherein the soil characteristic is soil Atterberg Limits.

9. The method described in claim 5, further predicting an operation effect at the field node for different points in time, the effect indicating suitability for performance of a soil engaging operation, the method further comprising the steps of:

determining values for one or more operation effect at the node for different points in time using operation effect tables giving values relative to operation characteristics, soil profile, and operation profile;

displaying values determined for one or more operation effect at the node for different points in time.

10. The method described in claim 9, wherein the operation effect is crop yield impact or fuel expense.

11. A method of predicting suitability for performance of a soil engaging operation at a field node for different points in time, the method comprising the steps of:

accessing predicted values for one or more operation variable at the node for different points in time;

selecting suitability parameters for each operation variable;

determining values for operation suitability at the node for different points in time using a suitability algorithm adapted to calculate values by comparing predicted operation variable values against the corresponding suitability parameters;

displaying values determined for operation suitability at the node for different points in time.

12. The method described in claim 11, wherein the operation variable is a weather condition, a soil condition, a soil characteristic, an operation characteristic, or an operation effect.

13. The method described in claim 11, wherein the operation suitability value for one or more field nodes is displayed in a table, graph, or map.

14. The method described in claim 11, wherein an operation variable value for one or more field nodes is displayed in a table, graph, or map.