Active Vehile Shield

• US 20060207820A1
• Filed: 03/20/2005
• Published: 09/21/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 03/20/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hemant Joshi, Jaya Joshi
• Original Assignee: Hemant Joshi, Jaya Joshi
• Inventors: Joshi, Hemant, Joshi, Jaya
• Application Number:
  US10/907,100
• Publication Number:
  US 20060207820A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 180/271
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2021/01252 Devices other than bags
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 21/0134 responsive to imminent contact with an obstacle , e.g. using radar systems

Abstract

An invention is disclosed for having an ‘active external vehicle shield’ which deploys on detection of an ‘imminent collision’ condition. This ‘invention’ provides a shield, which is fully deployed around the vehicle before the collision happens. When the collision happens this shield absorbs most of the collision energy, resulting in reduction of the risk of injury to the occupants of the vehicle.

Claims

1. A method for automatically scanning and detecting the ‘

imminent collision’

with moving or stationary objects in a pre determined ‘

hazard zone’

around the shield and deploying the shield around the vehicle before the collision happens.

2. A method as recited in claim 1, wherein all the moving or stationary objects in the ‘

hazard zone’

around the shield are continually scanned for their ‘

relative speed’ and

‘

distance’

with respect to the vehicle with shield.

3. A method as recited in claim 2, wherein the ‘

hazard zone’

is expanded or shrunk based upon the parameters like ‘

relative speed’ and

‘

distance’

of the moving or stationary objects with respect to the vehicle, detected by the prior-art sensors.

4. A method as recited in claim 3, wherein the base of the ‘

shield’

is attached to the vehicle on any of the locations, front, rear or both the sides.

5. A method as recited in claim 4, wherein the ‘

shield’

is an integral part of the vehicle with ‘

base’

connected to any of the locations, front, rear and both the sides.

6. A method as recited in claim 5, wherein the ‘

shield’

is deployed around the vehicle using the electromechanical devices when ‘

imminent collision’

condition is detected by the shield'"'"'s ‘

embedded microprocessor’

.

7. A method as recited in claim 6, wherein the ‘

shield’

contains a prior-art ‘

embedded microprocessor’

, which is situated in the ‘

base’

of the ‘

shield’ and

is running prior-art ‘

embedded software’

for detecting the condition of ‘

imminent collision’

before the collision happens.

8. A method as recited in claim 7, wherein the front of the shield'"'"'s ‘

impact zone’

consists of a shock absorbing material.

9. A method as recited in claim 8, wherein the front of the shield contains lots of prior-art sensors that detect the ‘

relative speed’ and

‘

distance’

of the vehicle with respect to the stationary and moving objects in a ‘

hazard-zone’

around the shield.

10. A method as recited in claim 9, wherein the ‘

imminent collision’

condition is detected by the ‘

embedded microprocessor’

running ‘

embedded software’

by constantly analyzing the inputs from the sensors located in the ‘

impact zone’

.

11. A method as recited in claim 10, wherein the ‘

impact absorbing plate-positioning system’

has a piston which can be pushed out of it'"'"'s assembly by exploding a charge.

12. A method as recited in claim 11, wherein the explosion is triggered by a signal line, which is controlled by the ‘

embedded microprocessor’

, when ‘

imminent collision’

is detected.

13. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein the ‘

impact absorption plates’

are forced to ‘

latch’

into the ‘

impact zone’

by the ‘

piston’

a part of the ‘

impact absorbing plate-positioning system’

prior to the collision. This is timed by ‘

embedded microprocessor’

such that the ‘

impact absorption plates’

are ‘

latched’

into the ‘

impact zone’

prior to the ‘

collision’

.

14. A method as recited in claim 13, wherein the ‘

impact zone’

of the shield moves forward out of the vehicles boundaries, when the ‘

impact absorption plates’

latch into the ‘

groove’

in the ‘

impact zone’

.

15. A method as recited in claim 14, wherein the ‘

impact zone’ and

latched ‘

impact absorption plates’

absorb most the force of the impact and crumple when the ‘

collision’

happens. This minimizes the energy that is transferred to the vehicle.

16. A method as recited in claim 15, wherein most of the shield is destroyed and absorbs most of the energy of the collision in that process and saves the occupants of the vehicles from injuries.