System and method for selecting a service provider

• US 20060212359A1
• Filed: 05/23/2003
• Published: 09/21/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 05/23/2002
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: River Dynamics Pty Limited
• Original Assignee: River Dynamics Pty Limited
• Inventors: Hudgeon, Douglas Robert
• Application Number:
  US10/516,036
• Publication Number:
  US 20060212359A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/26
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063 Operations research, analysis or management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

The invention provides a selection system and method to facilitate the provision of services on a computer network to prospective service users. In a preferred embodiment a computerised method of enabling a buyer to select a service provider for performing a service is described. The method includes processing a service enquiry for a particular service, and retrieving historical cost or invoicing data associated with said service in respect of a plurality of service providers in response to the enquiry. The historical cost data is processed to arrive at comparable cost data for enabling the selection of a service provider to perform the particular service. Cost or invoicing data relating to the provision of the particular service by the selected service provider is then captured, and the historical cost data is updated by incorporating the captured cost data. In this way, separate quoting or tendering is eliminated and job selection is effectively based on historical invoicing data.

Claims

1. A computerised method of enabling a buyer to select a service provider for performing a service, said method including:

(a) processing a service enquiry for a particular service;

(b) retrieving historical cost data associated with said service in respect of a plurality of service providers in response to said service enquiry;

(c) processing said historical cost data to arrive at comparable cost data in respect of said plurality of service providers for enabling the selection of a service provider to perform the particular service;

(d) capturing cost data relating to the provision of the particular service by the selected service provider; and

(e) updating the historical cost data by incorporating said captured cost data

wherein the historical cost data includes corresponding historical service enquiry data, and wherein the step of processing said historical cost data includes processing said related service enquiry data to arrive at comparable cost data.

2. A computerised method as claimed in claim 1 which includes repeating steps (a) to (e) to enable a buyer to select a service provider for the provision of subsequent services with the aid of regularly updated historical cost data.

3. A computerised method as claimed in either claim 1 which includes compiling an historical cost dataset including historical cost data components associated with the provision of at least one similar previous service by each service provider.

4. A computerised method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the service enquiry includes a plurality of service components and the historical cost data includes historical cost data for a plurality of comparable service components, and step (c) includes:

processing said historical cost data to arrive at cost data for each of said service components.

5. A computerised method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cost data captured in step (d) includes cost data for each of the service components included in the service enquiry.

6. A computerised method as claimed in claim 5 in which the service components include cost per unit of time and/or distance, in combination together with units of time and/or distance.

7. A computerised method as claimed in claim 1 which includes the additional steps of:

(f) retrieving historical quality data associated with said service in respect of a plurality of service providers in response to said enquiry; and

(g) processing said historical quality data to arrive at comparable quality data in respect of said service providers to enable the selection of a service provider to perform the particular service.

8. A computerised method as claimed in claim 7 which includes the additional steps of:

(h) capturing quality data relating to the provision of the particular service by the selected service provider; and

(i) updating the historical quality data to incorporate said captured quality data.

9. A computerised method as claimed in claim 8 which includes:

repeating steps (F) to (i) to assist a buyer to select a service provider for the provision of subsequent services with the aid of regularly updated quality data.

10. A computerised method as claimed in claim 1 which includes:

compiling an historical quality dataset including historical quality data associated with the provision of at least one previous service by each service provider.

11. A computerised method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the historical quality data includes historical quality data for a plurality of performance attributes, and the service request enquiry includes a plurality of comparable performance attribute weightings reflecting the relative importance of at least two of the performance attributes to the buyer.

12. A computerised method as claimed in claim 7 wherein step (g) includes:

processing said historical quality data in respect of each of the performance attributes to arrive at comparable performance data in respect of each performance attribute, and combining said comparable performance data according to performance attribute weightings contained in the service enquiry for each service provider, to generate said comparable quality data.

13. A computerised method as claimed in claim 7 which includes quantifying the quality data relating to selected performance attributes using any derived scale, weighting such performance attributes according to their relative importance, normalising the data relating to one or more of said selected performance attributes and combining them with the similarly normalised historical cost data relating to other selected performance attributes, in combination with an additional weighting factor.

14. A computerised method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the comparable cost data and comparable quality data in respect of each of the service providers is combined to derive a comparable performance index for each service provider for enabling the selection of a service provider to perform the particular service, with the combination of the comparable cost data and comparable quality data being arranged in accordance with weightings reflecting the relative importance of the comparable cost data and comparable quality data to the buyer.

16. A computerised method according to claim 1 which includes the steps of capturing service enquiry data associated with the captured cost data, and updating the historical cost data by incorporating said captured service enquiry data.

20. A computer-readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions for causing a computer to perform a method of claim 1.

21. A computer operating under the control of the computer readable medium of claim 20.

15. (canceled)

17. A computerised method of enabling a buyer to select a service provider for performing a service, said method including:

(a) compiling historical cost and quality datasets including historical cost and quality data associated with the provision of at least one previous service by each service provider;

(b) receiving and processing a service enquiry from the buyer for a particular service;

(c) retrieving historical cost and quality data associated with said service in respect of a plurality of service providers in response to said enquiry; and

(d) processing said historical cost and quality data to arrive at comparable cost and quality data in respect of said service providers for enabling the selection of a service provider to perform the particular service.

18. A computerised method as claimed in claim 17 which includes:

(e) capturing cost and quality data relating to the provision of the particular service by the selected service provider; and

(f) updating the historical cost and quality data to incorporate said captured cost and quality data, and repeating steps (b) to (F) to enable a buyer to select a service provider for the provision of subsequent services.

19. A computerised method as claimed in claim 17 which includes formatting the service enquiry into a plurality of service components, and formatting the historical cost and quality data into a plurality of comparable service components, with step (d) including:

processing said historical cost and quality data to arrive at cost and quality data for each of said components.

22. A computer system to enable a buyer to select a service provider for performing a service, said system including:

an enquiry processing device configured to receive and process a service enquiry for a particular service from the buyer;

a database configured to store historical cost data associated with said service in respect of a plurality of service providers; and

a processor carrying instructions to retrieve and process said historical cost data from said database in response to said query to arrive at comparable cost data in respect of said service providers for enabling the buyer to select a service provider, on the basis of said comparable cost data, to perform the particular service.

23. A computer system as claimed in claim 22 which includes:

a data capture component configured to capture cost data relating to the provision of the particular service by the selected service provider, and updating means to update the historical cost data on the database with said captured cost data.

24. A computer system as claimed in claim 22 in which the system further includes:

a data compilation component configured to compile a dataset including historical cost and quality data associated with the provision of at least one previous service by each service provider.

25. A computer system as claimed in claim 22 wherein the enquiry processing device is configured to additionally retrieve historical quality data associated with said service in respect of a plurality of service providers in response to said enquiry, and the enquiry processing device is configured to generate comparable quality data from said historical quality data in respect of said service providers.

26. A computer system as claimed in claim 25 wherein the historical quality data includes historical quality data for a plurality of performance attributes, and the service request enquiry includes a plurality of comparable performance attribute weightings reflecting the importance of each of the performance attributes to the buyer.

27. A computer system as claimed in claim 26 wherein the processor is configured to process said historical quality data in respect of each of the performance attributes to arrive at comparable performance data in respect of each performance attribute, and to combine the comparable performance data according to the performance attribute weightings included in the service enquiry for each service provider, to generate said comparable quality data.

28. A computer system as claimed in claim 25 wherein the processor is configured to derive a comparable performance index for each service provider by combining the comparable cost data and comparable quality data in respect of each of the service providers with the combination of the comparable cost data and comparable quality data being is performed in accordance with weightings reflecting the relative importance of the comparable cost data and comparable quality data to the buyer.

34. A computer system as claimed in claim 27 wherein the data storage means is configured to store a second dataset including a plurality of service providers, a plurality of associated services and a plurality of associated historical quality data, and said processor means is configured to additionally receive historical quality data associated with each service provider and generate comparative quality data for each service provider according to a predetermined algorithm;

and said communication means is arranged to communicate said comparative quality data to the buyer to enable the buyer to select a service provider.

35. A computer system as claimed in claim 22 wherein the database is configured to store historical service enquiry data associated with the historical cost data, and wherein the processor executes instructions to retrieve and process said historical cost data in conjunction with said related service enquiry data to arrive at said comparable cost data.

36. A computer system as claimed in claim 23 wherein the data capture component is configured to capture service enquiry data associated with the captured cost data, with the updating means being arranged to update the historical cost data on the database with said captured cost and service enquiry data.

29. A computer system to enable a buyer to select a service provider for performing a service, said system including:

a database configured to store a first dataset including a plurality of service providers, a plurality of associated services and a plurality of associated historical costs;

a processor in communication with said database, wherein said processor is configured to receive historical cost data associated with each service provider and to generate comparative cost data for each service provider according to a predetermined algorithm; and

a communication device configured to communicate said comparative cost data to said buyer to enable the buyer to select a service provider.

30. A computer system as claimed in claim 29 wherein the predetermined algorithm includes weighting means configured to weight a plurality of received historical cost data according to the respective associated service of the historical cost data, and to generate the comparative cost data in accordance with said weighting.

31. A computer system as claimed in claim 30 wherein said processor includes weighting optimisation means adapted to optimise the weightings applied by the weighting means to the received historical cost data, with the weighting optimisation means utilising an algorithm which has the effect of weighting the most recent data more heavily.

32. A computer system as claimed in claim 29 which further includes data capture means configured to capture cost data associated with a current service provided by a service provider, and updating means adapted to update said first data set to include said cost data associated with the current service provided by a service provider.

33. A computer system as claimed in claim 29 wherein the historical cost data includes a plurality of associated service components and associated historical cost component data;

and the processor is configured to generate comparative cost data in respect of each service component for each service provider.

37. (canceled)