Method and apparatus for performing dynamic link selection

• US 20060221998A1
• Filed: 12/19/2005
• Published: 10/05/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 03/31/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Interdigital Technology Corporation (InterDigital, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Interdigital Technology Corporation (InterDigital, Inc.)
• Inventors: Zaki, Maged, Lu, Guang, Livet, Catherine
• Application Number:
  US11/311,207
• Publication Number:
  US 20060221998A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/464
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 1/20 using signal quality detector
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/5692 Selection among different networks

Abstract

A method and system for performing dynamic link selection (DLS) between transmit/receive units (TRUs). A first TRU determines whether a second TRU has multiple interfaces with a DLS capability. If the second TRU has multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the first TRU sends a packet to the second TRU through a selected link. The first TRU then receives a report from the second TRU and evaluates quality of the link based on the report. The first TRU selects a link for a new packet in accordance with a predetermined criteria and the quality of the link. If the second TRU does not have multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the first TRU periodically sends probe packets to the second TRU via all available links. The second TRU sends response packets and the first TRU evaluates the quality of link based on statistics of the response packets.

Claims

1. In a communication system including a first transmit/receive unit (TRU) and a second TRU, a method of selecting a link used to establish communications between the first TRU and the second TRU, the method comprising:

the first TRU determining whether the second TRU has multiple interfaces with a dynamic link selection (DLS) capability;

if the second TRU has multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the first TRU sending a packet to the second TRU through a selected link over which the first TRU and the second TRU can communicate with each other and receiving a report from the second TRU; and

the first TRU selecting a link based on the report.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the report from the second TRU includes link quality information.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the link quality information includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator, throughput and delay time of the packet transmitted by the first TRU.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the second TRU includes a recommended link in the report, whereby the first TRU may select the recommended link.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising

if the second TRU does not have multiple interfaces with the DLS capability,

the first TRU periodically sending probe packets to the second TRU via all available links,

the second TRU sending response packets in response to the probe packets;

and

the first TRU evaluating the quality of link based on statistics of the response packets.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the statistics of the response packets includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator, throughput and delay time of the response packets.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the predetermined criteria includes at least one of quality of service (QoS), resource availability, cost and security.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the first TRU generates a combined metric for selecting a best link using the predetermined criteria.

9. The method of claim 7 further comprising the first TRU determining whether link reliability is critical for the new packet, whereby if the link reliability is not critical for the new packet, the first TRU chooses a link based on resource saving and if the link reliability is critical for the new packet, the first TRU chooses a link based on QoS.

10. A transmit/receive unit (TRU) for dynamically selecting a link, the TRU comprising:

multiple sets of physical layers and medium access control (MAC) layers, each set of physical layer and MAC layer supporting an interface under a different communication protocol; and

a dynamic link selection (DLS) layer configured to determine whether another TRU has multiple interfaces with a DLS capability, whereby if another TRU has multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the DLS layer sends a packet to another TRU through a selected link and selects a link for a new packet based on a report which is sent by another TRU and a predetermined criteria.

11. The TRU of claim 10 wherein the report includes link quality information.

12. The TRU of claim 11 wherein the link quality information includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator and delay time of the packet.

13. The TRU of claim 10 wherein the DLS layer may accept a recommended link sent by another TRU in the report.

14. The TRU of claim 10 wherein if another TRU does not have multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the DLS layer sends probe packets to another TRU via all available links and evaluates the quality of link based on statistics of response packets sent by another TRU in response to the probe packets.

15. The TRU of claim 14 wherein the statistics of the response packets includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator and delay time of the response packets.

16. The TRU of claim 10 wherein the predetermined criteria includes at least one of quality of service (QoS), resource availability, cost and security.

17. The TRU of claim 16 wherein the DLS layer generates a combined metric for selecting the link using the predetermined criteria.

18. The TRU of claim 16 wherein the DLS layer determines whether link reliability is critical for the new packet, whereby if the link reliability is not critical for the new packet, the DLS layer chooses a link based on resource saving and if the link reliability is critical for the new packet, the DLS layer chooses a link based on QoS.

19. A communication system supporting dynamic link selection, the system comprising:

a plurality of transmit/receive units (TRUs), at least one TRU comprising;

multiple sets of physical layers and medium access control (MAC) layers, each set of physical layer and MAC layer supporting an interface under a different communication protocol; and

a dynamic link selection (DLS) layer configured to determine whether another TRU has multiple interfaces with a DLS capability, whereby if another TRU has multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the DLS layer sends a packet to another TRU through a selected link and selects a link for a new packet based on a report which is sent by another TRU and a predetermined criteria.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein the report includes link quality information.

21. The system of claim 20 wherein the link quality information includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator and delay time of the packet.

22. The system of claim 19 wherein the DLS layer of the TRU may accept a recommended link which is sent by another TRU in the report.

23. The system of claim 19 wherein if another TRU does not have multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the DLS layer sends probe packets to another TRU via all available links and evaluates the quality of link based on statistics of response packets sent by another TRU in response to the probe packets.

24. The system of claim 23 wherein the statistics of the response packets includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator and delay time of the response packets.

25. The system of claim 19 wherein the predetermined criteria includes at least one of quality of service (QoS), resource availability, cost and security.

26. The system of claim 25 wherein the DLS layer generates a combined metric for selecting the link using the predetermined criteria.

27. The system of claim 25 wherein the DLS layer determines whether link reliability is critical for the new packet, whereby if the link reliability is not critical for the new packet, the DLS layer chooses a link based on resource saving and if the link reliability is critical for the new packet, the DLS layer chooses a link based on QoS.

28. An integrated circuit (IC) for selecting a link between transmit/receive units (TRUs) in communication, at least one link being established between the TRUs, the IC comprising:

multiple sets of physical layers and medium access control (MAC) layers, each set of physical layer and MAC layer supporting an interface under a different communication protocol;

a dynamic link selection (DLS) layer configured to determine whether another TRU has multiple interfaces with a DLS capability, whereby if another TRU has a DLS capability, the DLS layer sends a packet to another TRU through a selected link and selects a link for a new packet based a report from another TRU and a predetermined criteria.

29. The IC of claim 28 wherein the report from another TRU includes link quality information.

30. The IC of claim 29 wherein the link quality information includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator and delay time of the packet transmitted by the first TRU.

31. The IC of claim 28 wherein the DLS layer of the TRU may accept a recommended link sent by another TRU in the report.

32. The IC of claim 28 wherein if another TRU does not have multiple interfaces with the DLS capability, the DLS layer sends probe packets to another TRU via all available links and evaluates the quality of link based on statistics of response packets sent by another TRU in response to the probe packets.

33. The IC of claim 32 wherein the statistics of the response packets includes at least one of a bit error rate, a packet error rate, a signal-to-noise ratio, a received signal strength indicator and delay time of the response packets.

34. The IC of claim 28 wherein the predetermined criteria includes at least one of quality of service (QoS), resource availability, cost and security.

35. The IC of claim 34 wherein the DLS layer generates a combined metric for selecting the link using the predetermined criteria.

36. The IC of claim 34 wherein the DLS layer determines whether link reliability is critical for the new packet, whereby if link reliability is not critical for the new packet, the DLS layer chooses a link based on resource saving and if the link reliability is critical for the new packet, the DLS layer chooses a link based on QoS.