Comparing and contrasting models of business

• US 20060224425A1
• Filed: 09/19/2005
• Published: 10/05/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 03/31/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Homann, Ulrich, Isaacs, Scott M., Levy, Marc, Merrifield, Eric Sabbaton Jr., Davidson, Elizabeth L., Appel, David Benjamin
• Application Number:
  US11/230,206
• Publication Number:
  US 20060224425A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0637 Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

The present invention extends to comparing and contrasting models of business. Model processing modules implement formal operators that can be used to manipulate models of business. A compare operator can be used to compare similarly typed models of business. A contrast operator can be used to contrast differ types of business models. A constraint operator can be used to check business models for compliance with constraints. A refinement operator can be used to refine business models based on industry (or otherwise more) specific data. A compose operator can be used to compose new business models from portions of other business models.

Claims

1. At a computer system, a method for refining a business model, the method comprising:

an act of accessing a structured business model representing a business architecture, the structured business model being structured in accordance with a data model;

an act of identifying a specific business architecture that is to be modeled based on the structured business model, the specific business architecture being more specific than the business architecture;

an act of accessing business specific data for the specified business architecture;

an act of refining the structured business model into a business specific structured data model based on the accessed business specific data; and

an act of modeling the specified business architecture in accordance with the business specific structured data model.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the act accessing a structured business model representing a business architecture comprises an act of accessing an instance of a business capability model.

3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the act accessing a structured business model representing a business architecture comprises an act of accessing a structured business model selecting from among a service model, a process flow model, and an organizational model.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the act of identifying a specific business architecture that is to be modeled based on the structured business model comprises an act of identifying industry specific business architecture.

5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the act of accessing business specific data for the specified business architecture comprises an act of accessing industry specific data for an industry specific business architecture.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the act of refining the structured business model into a business specific structured data model based on the accessed business specific data comprises an act of refining the structured business model into an industry specific structured data model based on industry specific data.

7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the act of refining the structured business model into an industry specific structured data model based on industry specific data comprises an act of manipulating data formats of the data model based on the industry specific data.

8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the act of modeling the specified business architecture in accordance with the business specific structured data model comprises an act of modeling an industry specific business architecture in accordance with an industry specific structured data model.

9. At a computer system, a method for composing a business model, the method comprising:

an act of receiving an indication that a business architecture including a set of business components is to be modeled;

an act of identifying that a first portion of the set of business components is included in a first structured business model, the first structured business model being selected from among a plurality of different business models;

an act of extracting the first portion of the set of business components from the first structured business model;

an act of identifying that a second portion of the set of business components is included in a second structured business model, the second structured business model being selected from among the plurality of different business models;

an act of extracting the second portion of the set of business components from the second structured business model; and

an act of composing at least the first portion and second portion of the set of business components into a model of the business architecture.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the act of receiving an indication that a business architecture including a set of business components is to be modeled comprises an act of receiving an indication that a set of business capabilities is to be modeled.

11. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the act of receiving an indication that a business architecture including a set of business components is to be modeled comprises an act of receiving an indication that a business architecture including a set of business components is to be modeled, wherein the set of business components is one of a set of service model components, process flow model components, and organizational model components.

12. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the act of identifying that a first portion of the set of business components is included in a first structured business model comprises an act of identifying that a first portion of a set of business capabilities components is included in a first business capability model.

13. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the act of extracting the second portion of the set of business components from the second structured business model comprises an act of extracting a portion of a set of business components, the set of business components being selected from one of service model components, process flow model components, and organizational model components.

14. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the first structured business model and the second structured business model are different business models for modeling the same type of business components.

15. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the act of composing at least the first portion and second portion of the set of business components into a model of the business architecture comprises an act of composing first business capability components and second different business capability components into a business capability model.

16. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the act of identifying that a first portion of the set of business components is included in a first structured business model comprises an act of identifying that a first portion of the set of business components is included in an industry specific business architecture.

17. A system for manipulating models of business, the system comprising:

one or more processors;

system memory;

one or more computer readable media having stored thereon one or more modules for manipulating business models, the modules including;

a comparison module configured to compare models of business;

a mapping module configured to map between models of business;

a constraint module configured to determine if models of business satisfy constraints;

a refinement module configured to refine models of business based on refinement criteria; and

a composition module configured to compose a model of business form other models of business.

18. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the comparison module configured to compare models of business comprises a comparison module configured to compare business models to best practices business models.

19. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the mapping module configured to map between models of business comprises a mapping module configured to map between models of different business layers.

20. The system as recited in claim 17, the composition module configured to compose a model of business form other models of business comprises a composition module configured to compose a model of business from other models of business modeled in accordance with different data models.