System and method for providing integration of service-oriented architecture and Web services

• US 20060235733A1
• Filed: 04/13/2005
• Published: 10/19/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 04/13/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Agilepath Holdings LLC
• Original Assignee: Agilepath Holdings LLC
• Inventors: Marks, Eric A.
• Application Number:
  US11/104,901
• Publication Number:
  US 20060235733A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/108 Remote banking, e.g. home banking

Abstract

A system and method for providing integration of service-oriented architecture (SOA) is provided. Generally, the method comprising the steps of: identifying SOA drivers, thereby determining matters that are driving the company to integrate the SOA and Web services into the company; developing a business initiative roadmap, thereby performing an analysis of current and planned business initiatives and projects of the company, and an analysis of current and potential services that will be required to implement or support the business initiatives during the providing integration of the SOA and Web services; developing an SOA technology roadmap, thereby determining necessary SOA enabling technical solutions that can be implemented to support the developed business initiative roadmap; and prioritizing and sequencing the business initiative roadmap and the SOA technology roadmap, thereby synchronizing the business initiatives and Web service initiatives with implementation of the supporting SOA technical solutions determined during the step of developing the SOA technology roadmap.

Claims

1. A method of providing integration of service-oriented architecture (SOA) and Web services into a company, comprising the steps of:

identifying SOA drivers, thereby determining matters that are driving the company to integrate said SOA and Web services into the company;

developing a business initiative roadmap, thereby performing an analysis of current and planned business initiatives and projects of said company, and an analysis of current and potential services that will be required to implement or support said business initiatives during said providing integration of said SOA and Web services;

developing an SOA technology roadmap, thereby determining necessary SOA enabling technical solutions that can be implemented to support said developed business initiative roadmap; and

prioritizing and sequencing said business initiative roadmap and said SOA technology roadmap, thereby synchronizing said business initiatives and Web service initiatives with implementation of said supporting SOA technical solutions determined during said step of developing said SOA technology roadmap.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of performing an information technology (IT) architecture assessment, thereby performing a review of current IT architecture and needs in said IT architecture for said implementation of said SOA and Web Services.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of performing an IT architecture assessment further comprises the steps of:

performing an SOA assessment of current state IT architecture, thereby determining what IT elements are currently available in said company and whether said IT elements will support said SOA;

determining SOA architecture gaps, thereby determining what SOA core solutions are missing from said IT architecture; and

identifying SOA enablement solutions required to close said architecture gaps.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of identifying SOA drivers further comprises the steps of:

identifying at least one business imperative, wherein said business imperative is required to be fixed or implemented by said company for said company to continue functioning according to a business strategy;

identify at least one IT imperative, wherein said IT imperative is required to be fixed or implemented by said company for said company to continue functioning according to said business strategy;

identifying how SOA and Web services can eliminate said IT imperatives; and

identifying clear business outcomes from integrating said SOA and said Web services, wherein said clear business outcomes are derived from said SOA drivers, said at least one business imperative, and said at least one IT imperative.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of documenting said identified SOA drivers so that said identified SOA drivers may be considered prior to integrating said SOA and said Web services.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of developing a business initiative roadmap, further comprises the steps of:

identifying current and planned business initiatives, where said business initiatives are high level goals that said company may have to address issues required to be fixed or implemented by said company for said company to continue functioning according to a business strategy;

identifying current and planned projects, where said projects are used to accomplish said business initiatives;

identify Web services that would support said projects and said initiatives; and

creating a services map and conceptual services architecture, resulting in a developed Web services portfolio for said company.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said step of creating said services map and conceptual services architecture further comprises the steps of:

developing a value chain for said company;

identifying major business processes relating to said value chain;

identifying major business initiatives planned in the near and medium term by process area, after which said major business initiatives are linked to said identified major business processes;

identifying business concept services; and

identifying business and IT services that comprise said business concept service.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein said step of creating said services map and conceptual services architecture further comprises the steps of:

classifying said identified business concept services into service types;

defining implementation of said identified business concept services, thereby clarifying steps required to implement said identified business concept services; and

prioritizing said identified business concept services.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of prioritizing said identified business concept services further comprises the step of prioritizing said identified business concept services by one of a group consisting of impact, value, complexity, and re-use.

10. The method of claim 6, further comprising the step of prioritizing said Web services by said identified business initiatives and said determined business imperatives.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of developing said SOA technology roadmap further comprises the steps of:

developing a business initiatives roadmap;

developing an SOA technology roadmap enabling infrastructure; and

developing an SOA business case.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said step of developing a business initiative roadmap, further comprises the steps of:

identifying current and planned business initiatives, where said business initiatives are high level goals that said company may have to address issues required to be fixed or implemented by said company for said company to continue functioning according to a business strategy;

identifying current and planned projects, where said projects are used to accomplish said business initiatives;

identify Web services that would support said projects and said initiatives; and

creating a services map and conceptual services architecture, resulting in a developed Web services portfolio for said company.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein said step of developing said SOA technology roadmap enabling infrastructure, further comprises the steps of:

determining needed SOA enablement solutions; and

determining a sequence of SOA enablement solution implementation based on said business initiatives roadmap.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein said step of developing an SOA business case further comprises the step of determining a cost justification for implementing said SOA technology roadmap.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of prioritizing and sequencing said business initiative roadmap and said SOA technology roadmap further comprises the steps of:

prioritizing said business initiative roadmap;

separately prioritizing said SOA technology roadmap; and

synchronizing said business initiative roadmap and said SOA technology roadmap, thereby ensuring that said SOA enabling technology solutions are implemented only when required to support said current and planned business initiatives in said business initiative roadmap.

16. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of developing an SOA governance model and policies, thereby providing enterprise-wide SOA architectural standards definition, control, and enforcement.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein said step of developing said SOA governance model and policies further comprising the steps of:

designing an SOA governance model;

engaging with needed business organizations that are necessary to integrate said SOA and Web services; and

designing an organizational model.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the step of developing a core SOA integration team.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising the step of planning for said core SOA integration team to dissolve over time.

20. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of developing SOA scorecards and SOA metrics, thereby providing a visual solution for ongoing management of said SOA and Web services.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein said step of developing said scorecards and metrics further comprising the steps of:

ensuring that said SOA metrics are required to be identified to support said clear business outcomes;

developing said SOA scorecard to identify, relate, and aggregate said SOA metrics into a single visual solution for ongoing management of said integrated SOA and Web services;

tracking progress of an implemented SOA; and

implementing said SOA scorecard.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein said developed SOA scorecard is software.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein said developed SOA scorecard is a consulting service.