Quantitative EEG as an identifier of learning modality

• US 20060257834A1
• Filed: 05/09/2006
• Published: 11/16/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 05/10/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Nielsen Company (US) LLC (RR Donnelley & Sons Company)
• Original Assignee: Nielsen Company (US) LLC (RR Donnelley & Sons Company)
• Inventors: Lee, Hans C., Hong, Timmie T., Williams, William H., Lee, Linda M., Guiroy, Ilang M., Lee, Michael J.
• Application Number:
  US11/430,555
• Publication Number:
  US 20060257834A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/236
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/16 Devices for psychotechnics using teaching or educational appliances G09B1/00 - G09B7/00; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/377 using evoked responses
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/383 Somatosensory stimuli, e.g. electric stimulation
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/00 Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying F41G3/26
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 23/28 for medicine

Abstract

A quantitative, objective method utilizing physiological data is provided for evaluating the modality of learning for a user and determining in which modality the user is most effective at learning. The method utilizes a session where the user is provided a set of information while wearing sensors for measuring physiological data such as brain electrical activity, and where the physiological data values are then correlated with learning modalities. The process can be performed quickly, without the bias and poor granularity of self-reported learning modality assessments. This method can be employed before the design of teaching curricula to ensure that learners are receiving information in the modality that suits them best and enables them to learn most effectively. This method may also be employed with a testing session to further correlate physiological data, learning modality, and testing performance.

Claims

1. A method for determining a user'"'"'s most effective learning modality comprising:

a. measuring physiological data of a user with a group comprising of a single or plurality of sensors,

b. when measuring the user, providing a learning phase, where a set of information is provided to the user in a predetermined number of different modalities,

c. correlating the physiological data with the modalities in the learning phase,

d. comparing the physiological data of the modalities, whereby the user'"'"'s most effective learning modality can be determined quickly, quantitatively, and objectively.

2. A method of claim 1 wherein the sensors comprises a single or plurality of electroencephalogram sensors.

3. A method of claim 2 wherein the physiological data comprises electrical activity of the brain of the user.

4. A method of claim 3 wherein the electrical activity comprises alpha and theta frequencies.

5. A method of claim 4 further comprising:

a. calculating an alpha energy using said alpha frequencies and calculating a theta energy using said theta frequencies,

b. utilizing the alpha energy and the theta energy as inputs in a formula, where said formula is a measure of mental effort, where the mental effort is used in place of the physiological data for correlating and comparing.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the formula comprises a ratio of alpha energy and theta energy

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said modalities comprises an auditory learning modality.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the set of information provided in the auditory learning modality comprises the user hearing the set of information.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein the set of information provided in the auditory learning modality comprises the user speaking the set of information.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein said modalities comprises a visual learning modality.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the set of information provided in the visual learning modality comprises the user reading the set of information.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein the set of information provided in the visual learning modality comprises the user viewing illustrations of the set of information.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said modalities comprises a tactile learning modality.

14. The method of claim 13 where the set of information provided in the tactile learning modality comprises the user writing the set of information.

15. The method of claim 13 where the set of information provided in the tactile learning modality comprises the user drawing the set of information.

16. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. providing a testing phase where the user is tested on the set of information provided in the learning phase, whereby the testing phase serves to verify the most effective learning modality and correlate the mental effort of each modality with testing performance

17. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a providing a display for displaying the physiological data and correlated modalities.

18. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. utilizing the most effective learning modality in a curriculum for teaching a topic, whereby said curriculum is more effective at teaching said topic because the user learns in the most effective modality

19. The method of claim 18 wherein said curriculum is presented as an interactive video game

20. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. saving to a computer readable storage media the physiological data and correlated modalities

21. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. repeating (a)-(c) of claim 1 an indeterminate number of times over a period of time to obtain a set of physiological data and correlated modalities,

b. comparing the set of physiological data and correlated modalities

22. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. recording the user'"'"'s demographic information

b. repeating (a)-(c) of claim 1 and (a) of claim 22 for an indeterminate number of users to obtain a set of physiological data and correlated modalities

c. comparing the set of physiological data and correlated modalities and demographic information

23. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. ranking the effectiveness of different modalities according to the physiological data