Software for continued evaluation, diagnosis and monitoring of patients on physical therapy

• US 20060276727A1
• Filed: 06/01/2005
• Published: 12/07/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 06/01/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Tim Terrio
• Original Assignee: Tim Terrio
• Inventors: Terrio, Tim
• Application Number:
  US11/141,719
• Publication Number:
  US 20060276727A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/595
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/103 Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes A61B5/08 takes precedence; measuring aids for tailors A41H1/00; measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry A61C19/04
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4824 Touch or pain perception evaluation A61B5/4821 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/20 for electronic clinical trials or questionnaires
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 10/60 for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 15/00 ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof

Abstract

A computer-program-implemented system for creating and maintaining physical therapy patient information and displaying the patient information via a graphical user interface comprised of a series of pages which are interconnected/interlinked. The computer-program-implemented system includes the ability to efficiently evaluate therapy patients in a standardized fashion by receiving, recording and storing patient demographic information in a database, selecting a standardized automated evaluation from a previously generated list of several possible standardized automated evaluations (the selected standardized automated evaluation containing a series of questions), recording responses to said series of questions contained in the selected standardized automated evaluation and storing said responses in said database, and assigning a numerical value or score to said evaluation as a function of said recorded and stored responses.

Claims

1. A computer-program-implemented system for evaluating and monitoring physical therapy patients, the system comprises:

a patient information database for storing detailed patient information;

a graphical user interface for providing the detailed patient information for viewing by a therapist user and a physician, wherein said graphical user interface allows said therapist user to conduct standardized/uniform patient evaluations over the course of therapy and store the results of those patient evaluations in the patient information database such that both the therapist user and the physician can access and monitor the results of those evaluations over a shared network.

2. The computer-program-implemented system of claim 1, wherein the standardized/uniform patient evaluations include function and non-functional evaluations, with a therapist user conducting at least one of each type for each individual patient.

3. The computer-program-implemented system of claim 2, wherein each functional evaluation is assigned a total numerical value or score.

4. The computer-program-implemented system of claim 2, wherein the total numerical value or score assigned to each evaluation is on a scale of 0 to 10, such that as patients are continuously treated and evaluated over the course of their individual therapy, the goal is to continually increase their total numerical value or score as each subsequent functional evaluation is performed.

5. A computer program product for use in providing continued physical therapy to patients, said computer program product comprising:

a computer usable medium having computer readable program code embodied within said medium for causing a computer to;

receive, record and store patient demographic information in a database, said demographic information including the patient name, address, age, injury status, and name of referring physician;

provide a selectable listing of several possible standardized automated evaluations from which a particular standardized automated evaluation may be selected;

displaying a series of questions to be answered in response to said selected standardized automated evaluation;

recording responses to said series of questions and storing said responses to said evaluation in said database for future reference;

assigning a numerical value or score to said evaluation as a function of said recorded and stored responses.

6. The computer program product of claim 5, wherein the computer readable program code embodied within said medium further causes a computer to:

display a PATIENT DETAILS page which includes basic patient demographic information such as the patient'"'"'s name and address, and further wherein said PATIENT DETAILS page further includes a listing of a series of therapy referrals, each referral in the series including a link to a REFERRAL DETAILS page where more specific information about each such referral can be retrieved.

7. The computer program product of claim 6, wherein the computer readable program code embodied within said medium further causes a computer to:

display a REFERRAL DETAILS page when one of the links associated with one of the referrals in the series is selected, said REFERRAL DETAILS page containing specific detailed information about the selected referral.

8. The computer program product of claim 6, wherein the computer readable program code embodied within said medium further causes a computer to:

display a REFERRAL DETAILS page when one of the links associated with one of the referrals in the series is selected, wherein said REFERRAL DETAILS page includes the therapy start date for such selected referral, the injury date (if known) related to the selected referral, any surgery date (where applicable) related to the selected referral, the name of the referring physician for the selected referral, the particular bones or joints involved in the selected referral, and the complexity of the evaluation.

9. The computer program product of claim 7, wherein the REFERRAL DETAILS page further includes information on prior patient evaluations related to such selected referral, including the type of each individual evaluation previously performed, the date such evaluation was performed, and the numerical value assigned to each such evaluation.

10. The computer program product of claim 5, wherein some of the standardized automated evaluations are functional evaluations which contain questions directed toward obtaining subjective information from a patient regarding his or her pain, mobility, dexterity and everyday functional ability.

11. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein the numerical value or score assigned to a functional evaluation is a functional outcome score based upon specific subjective responses given by the patient when completing the functional evaluation.

12. The computer program product of claim 5, wherein some of the standardized automated evaluations are non-functional evaluations which contain questions directed toward recording more objective information, such as measured observations made during the evaluation.

13. The computer program product of claim 12, wherein the numerical value or score assigned to a non-functional evaluation is a range of motion value which is based upon specific mobility and range of motion observed when conducting the non-functional evaluation.

14. A computer-program-implemented graphical user interface comprising:

an EVALUATIONS PAGE designed to allow a physical therapist to conduct a selected standardized automated evaluation of a physical therapy patient as a function of the patient'"'"'s injury;

wherein said EVALUATIONS PAGE includes;

a series of questions designed to provide a standardized automated evaluation of the patient'"'"'s injury;

previously recorded responses to said series of questions;

individual numerical values assigned to each of said recorded responses; and

a total numerical value assigned to the standardized automated evaluation, wherein said total numerical value is determined as a function of each of the individual numerical values assigned to each of said recorded responses.

15. The computer-program-implemented graphical user interface of claim 14, wherein some of the questions in the series of questions include in the EVALUATIONS PAGE are directed toward obtaining subjective information from the patient regarding his or her pain, mobility, dexterity and everyday functional ability.

16. The computer-program-implemented graphical user interface of claim 14, wherein some of the questions in the series of questions included in the EVALUATIONS PAGE are directed toward recording more objective information, such as measured observations made during the evaluation process.

17. A method for evaluating and monitoring of patients in physical therapy, said method comprising:

receiving, recording and storing patient demographic information in a database, said demographic information including the patient name, address, age, injury status, and name of referring physician;

selecting a standardized automated evaluation from a previously generated list of several possible standardized automated evaluations;

displaying a series of questions to be answered in response to said selected standardized automated evaluation;

performing said selected evaluation by recording responses to said series of questions and storing said responses to said evaluation in said database for future reference; and

assigning a numerical value or score to said evaluation as a function of said recorded and stored responses.

18. The computer program product of claim 17, wherein some of the standardized automated evaluations are functional evaluations which contain questions directed toward obtaining subjective information from a patient regarding his or her pain, mobility, dexterity and everyday functional ability.

19. The computer program product of claim 18, wherein the numerical value or score assigned to a functional evaluation is a functional outcome score determined as a function of the specific subjective responses given by the patient when completing the functional evaluation.

20. The computer program product of claim 17, wherein some of the standardized automated evaluations are non-functional evaluations which contain questions directed toward recording more

objective information, such as measured observations made during the evaluation.

21. The computer program product of claim 20, wherein the numerical value or score assigned to a non-functional evaluation is a range of motion value determined as function of the specific mobility and range of motion observed when conducting the non-functional evaluation.

22. The method of claim 17, further comprising the steps of:

plotting the assigned numerical value or score to said selected evaluation on a graph made visible to a user;

reselecting a standardized automated evaluation from a previously generated list of several possible standardized automated evaluations, wherein the reselected automated evaluation is preferably the same as that previously selected;

displaying the same series of questions to be answered in response to said reselected standardized automated evaluation;

performing said reselected evaluation by recording responses to said series of questions and storing said responses to said reselected evaluation in said database for future reference;

assigning a new numerical value or score to said re-selected evaluation as a function of said recorded and stored responses; and

plotting the new numerical value or score to said reselected evaluation on the same graph made visible to said user such that said user can see any difference between the original numerical value and the new numerical value in order to monitor a patient'"'"'s therapy progress.