Method and system for accelerated collateral review and analysis

• US 20060277141A1
• Filed: 05/31/2006
• Published: 12/07/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 06/02/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Robert Palmer
• Original Assignee: Robert Palmer
• Inventors: Palmer, Robert
• Application Number:
  US11/443,108
• Publication Number:
  US 20060277141A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/38
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/03 Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/16 Real estate

Abstract

A method and system for automated review and analysis of appraisal reports, including receiving and identifying an appraisal report. After identifying the appraisal report, relevant data and/or information contained therein is identified and extracted. The extracted data and/or information are then normalized for subsequent evaluation. Thereafter, the normalized data and/or information is evaluated to determine, for example, whether the appraisal report complies with generally accepted appraisal practices and whether the appraised property represents a low, moderate, high, or very high risk. The method and system also generates an output relating to the appraisal report evaluation.

Claims

1. A method for reviewing and evaluating an appraisal report, the method comprising:

identifying an appraisal report;

identifying relevant data contained in the appraisal report;

extracting the relevant data;

storing the extracted data in a data repository;

normalizing at least a portion of the extracted data;

applying one or more decision rules to the normalized data to identify one or more predetermined events; and

generating an evaluation report including an outcome of the one or more decision rules.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein normalizing the extracted data further comprises:

comparing one or more of the extracted data with known values;

determining whether the one or more extracted data match the known values; and

isolating the relevant data extracted from the appraisal report when the one or more extracted data does not match the known values.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein normalizing at least a portion of the extracted data further comprises:

substituting the one or more extracted data with a known value corresponding to the recognized extracted data.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein identifying the appraisal form is performed using one of optical character recognition and optical mark recognition techniques.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein identifying relevant data contained in the appraisal form is performed using one of optical character recognition and optical mark recognition techniques.

6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

generating one or more notations upon a predetermined outcome of the one or more decision rules.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the one or more notations comprise at least one of a group consisting of a rejection, a condition, a warning, a note, and a comment.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the appraisal report is an appraisal report for residential real property.

9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:

determining fraud in the appraisal report.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein determining fraud in the appraisal report comprises:

extracting a signature from the appraisal report;

identifying the location of the signature on the appraisal report; and

determining whether the signature is a genuine signature.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the step of determining whether the signature is a genuine signature further comprises:

comparing the signature to at least one known signature;

comparing the location of the signature to a known signature location.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein applying one or more decision rules to the normalized data to identify one or more predetermined events further comprises:

applying customizable rules for analyzing the normalized data.

13. The method according to claim 12, wherein applying customizable rules for analyzing the normalized data comprises:

comparing at least one data element of the normalized data to another data element.

14. The method according to claim 12, applying customizable rules for analyzing the normalized data comprises:

comparing at least one data element of the normalized data to a numerical value.

15. A system for reviewing and evaluating an appraisal report, the system comprising:

means for identifying an appraisal report;

means for identifying relevant data contained in the appraisal report;

means for extracting the relevant data;

means for storing the extracted data in a data repository;

means for normalizing at least a portion of the extracted data;

means for applying one or more decision rules to the normalized data to identify one or more predetermined events; and

means for generating an evaluation report including an outcome of the one or more decision rules.

16. A system for reviewing and evaluating an appraisal report, the system comprising:

a processor;

a user interface functioning via the processor; and

a repository accessible by the processor,

wherein an appraisal report is identified,

wherein relevant data contained in the appraisal report is identified,

wherein the relevant data is extracted,

wherein the extracted data is stored in the data repository,

wherein at least a portion of the extracted data is normalized,

wherein one or more decision rules are applied to the normalized data to identify one or more predetermined events, and

wherein an evaluation report is generated including an outcome of the one or more decision rules.

17. The system according to claim 16, wherein the processor is housed on a terminal.

18. The system according to claim 16, wherein the terminal is selected from a group consisting of a personal computer, a minicomputer, a main frame computer, a microcomputer, a hand-held device, and a telephonic device.

19. The system according to claim 16, wherein the processor is housed on a server.

20. The system according to claim 19, wherein the server is selected from a group consisting of a personal computer, a minicomputer, a microcomputer, and a main frame computer.

21. The system according to claim 19, wherein the server is coupled to a network.

22. The system according to claim 21, wherein the network is the Internet.

23. The system according to claim 21, wherein the server is coupled to the network via a coupling.

24. The system according to claim 23, wherein the coupling is selected from a group consisting of a wired connection, a wireless connection, and a fiberoptic connection.

25. The system according to claim 16, wherein the repository is housed on a server.

26. The system according to claim 25, wherein the server is coupled to a network.

27. A computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having control logic stored therein for causing a computer to review and evaluate an appraisal report, the control logic comprising:

first computer readable program code means for identifying an appraisal report;

second computer readable program code means for identifying relevant data contained in the appraisal report;

third computer readable program code means for extracting the relevant data;

fourth computer readable program code means for storing the extracted data in a data repository;

fifth computer readable program code means for normalizing at least a portion of the extracted data;

sixth computer readable program code means for applying one or more decision rules to the normalized data to identify one or more predetermined events; and

seventh computer readable program code means for generating an evaluation report including an outcome of the one or more decision rules.

28. The computer program product according to claim 27, the fifth computer readable program code means for normalizing at least a portion of the extracted data comprising:

eighth computer readable program code means for comparing one or more of the extracted data with known values;

ninth computer readable program code means for recognizing the one or more extracted data when the one or more extracted data matches the known values; and

tenth computer readable program code means for isolating the relevant data extracted from the appraisal report when the one or more extracted data does not match the known values.