Malfunction monitoring method and system

• US 20060277448A1
• Filed: 06/06/2006
• Published: 12/07/2006
• Est. Priority Date: 06/06/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: DENSO Corporation
• Original Assignee: DENSO Corporation
• Inventors: Koto, Kazuhiro, Komori, Hirokazu, Nishimura, Tadaharu
• Granted Patent: US 7,496,800 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/55
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/0757 by exceeding a time limit, i.e. time-out, e.g. watchdogs
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1417 Boot up procedures

Abstract

In a method, an interrupt is generated to the processing unit every predetermined period. The predetermined period is shorter than a predetermined timeout period. A watchdog signal is changed in response to each of the generated interrupts. The interrupt generation is disabled, upon the last interrupt being generated over an estimated time when the execution of the program is estimated to be completed.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring a watchdog signal output from a processing unit during execution of a program and of determining that the processing unit is presumed to be malfunctioning, upon lack of change in the monitored watchdog signal within a predetermined timeout period, the method comprising:

generating an interrupt to the processing unit every predetermined period, the predetermined period being shorter than the predetermined timeout period, the watchdog signal being changed in response to each of the generated interrupts; and

disabling the interrupt generation, upon the last interrupt being generated over an estimated time when the execution of the program is estimated to be completed.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the disabling further includes:

setting a determination value, the determination value being obtained by dividing the estimated time by the predetermined period;

counting the number of the interrupts generated by the generating; and

determining that the last interrupt is generated over the estimated time, upon the number of the interrupts generated by the generating exceeding the determination value.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, and the setting includes setting the determination value to each of the programs based on the estimated time thereof, the estimated time corresponding to a time when the execution of each of the programs is estimated to be completed.

4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, the plurality of programs are started from an initiation task, and terminated by a termination task, and the generating includes:

starting the interrupt generation every predetermined period in response to execution of the initiation task; and

terminating the interrupt generation in response to execution of the termination task.

5. A method according to claim 4, further comprising:

executing, as the initiation task, the following tasks;

a first task for changing the watchdog signal;

a second task for setting the determination value based on the estimated time when the execution of the program is estimated to be completed;

a third task for clearing a count value representing the number of the interrupts; and

a fourth task for activating a timer every predetermined period to count, and

executing, as the termination task, the following tasks;

a fifth task for changing the watchdog signal; and

a sixth task for stopping the timer.

6. A method according to claim 2, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, further comprising:

changing the determination value based on an estimated execution time during any one of tasks being executed by the processing unit, the tasks constituting the plurality of programs, the estimated execution time being estimated as an execution time of any one of the tasks.

7. A method according to claim 2, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, further comprising:

changing the predetermined period corresponding to any one of tasks being executed by the processing unit, the tasks constituting the plurality of programs.

8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, the plurality of programs are started from an initiation task, and terminated by a termination task, further comprising:

executing, as the initiation task, the following tasks;

a first task for changing the watchdog signal;

a second task for setting the predetermined period to a first period with respect to at least one of tasks, the tasks constituting the plurality of programs, the at least one of the tasks being executed by the processing unit until the predetermined period is changed;

a third task for setting the determination value to a first determination value, the first determination value being obtained by dividing a first estimated execution time by the first predetermined period, the first estimated execution time being estimated as an execution time of the at least one of the tasks;

a fourth task for clearing a count value representing the number of the interrupts; and

a fifth task for activating a timer every first predetermined period to count, and

executing, as the changing of the predetermined period corresponding to any one of the tasks, the following tasks;

is a sixth task for changing the watchdog signal;

a seventh task for stopping the timer,

an eighth task for setting the predetermined period with respect to any one of the tasks to a second period;

a ninth task for setting the determination value to a second determination value, the second determination value being obtained by dividing a second estimated execution time by the second predetermined period, the second estimated execution time being estimated as an execution time of the at least one of the tasks;

a tenth task for clearing a count value representing the number of the interrupts; and

an eleventh task for activating the timer every second predetermined period to count.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the generating generates an interrupt to the processing unit every predetermined period using a free run counter and at least one of:

overflow interrupt based on overflow of the free run counter;

compare match interrupt based on a count value of the free run counter and a setting value stored in a compare register; and

pulse width modulation periodic interrupt executed every time the count value of the free run counter reaches a pulse width modulation period set to a periodic register upon execution of duty control by the free run counter.

10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the program includes at least one of;

an initialization program to be executed at power-up of the processing unit; and

an off-task program that causes the processing unit to execute various tasks required at power-off of the processing unit.

11. A system for monitoring a watchdog signal output from a processing unit during execution of a program and for determining that the processing unit is presumed to be malfunctioning, upon lack of change in the monitored watchdog signal within a predetermined timeout period, the system comprising:

a generating unit configured to generate an interrupt to the processing unit every predetermined period, the predetermined period being shorter than the predetermined timeout period, the watchdog signal being changed in response to each of the generated interrupts; and

a disabling unit configured to disable the interrupt generation of the generating unit, upon the last interrupt being generated over an estimated time when the execution of the program is estimated to be completed.

12. A system according to claim 11, wherein the disabling unit further comprises;

a setting unit configured to set a determination value, the determination value being obtained by dividing the estimated time by the predetermined period;

a counting unit configured to count the number of the interrupts generated by the generating unit; and

a determining unit configured to determine that the last interrupt is generated over the estimated time, upon the number of the interrupts generated by the generating unit exceeding the determination value.

13. A system according to claim 12, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, and the setting unit is configured to set the determination value to each of the programs based on the estimated time thereof, the estimated time corresponding to a time when the execution of each of the programs is estimated to be completed.

14. A system according to claim 12, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, the plurality of programs are started from an initiation task, and terminated by a termination task, and the generating unit comprises:

a starting unit configured to start the interrupt generation every predetermined period in response to execution of the initiation task; and

a terminating unit configured to terminate the interrupt generation in response to execution of the termination task.

15. A system according to claim 14, further comprising:

a first executing unit configured to execute the initiation task; and

a second execution unit configured to execute the termination task, the first execution unit comprising;

a first unit configured to change the watchdog signal;

a second unit configured to set the determination value based on the estimated time when the execution of the program is estimated to be completed;

a third unit configured to clear a count value representing the number of the interrupts; and

a fourth unit having a timer and configured to activate the timer every predetermined period to count, and

the second execution unit comprising;

a fifth unit configured to change the watchdog signal; and

a sixth unit configured to stop the timer.

16. A system according to claim 12, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, further comprising:

a changing unit configured to change the determination value based on an estimated execution time during any one of tasks being executed by the processing unit, the tasks constituting the plurality of programs, the estimated execution time being estimated as an execution time of any one of the tasks.

17. A system according to claim 12, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, further comprising:

a changing unit configured to change the predetermined period corresponding to any one of tasks being executed by the processing unit, the tasks constituting the plurality of programs.

18. A system according to claim 17, wherein the program is composed of a plurality of programs to be sequentially executed by the processing unit, the plurality of programs are started from an initiation task, and terminated by a termination task, further comprising:

a first executing unit configured to execute the initiation task; and

a second execution unit configured to execute, as the changing of the predetermined period corresponding to any one of the tasks, the first execution unit comprising;

a first unit configured to change the watchdog signal;

a second unit configured to set the predetermined period to a first period with respect to at least one of the tasks, the at least one of the tasks being executed by the processing unit until the predetermined period is changed;

a third unit configured to set the determination value to a first determination value, the first determination value being obtained by dividing a first estimated execution time by the first predetermined period, the first estimated execution time being estimated as an execution time of the at least one of the tasks;

a fourth unit configured to clear a count value representing the number of the interrupts; and

a fifth unit configured to activate a timer every first predetermined period to count, the second execution unit comprising;

a sixth unit configured to change the watchdog signal;

a seventh unit configured to stop the timer,

an eighth unit configured to set the predetermined period with respect to any one of the tasks to a second period;

a ninth unit configured to set the determination value to a second determination value, the second determination value being obtained by dividing a second estimated execution time by the second predetermined period, the second estimated execution time being estimated as an execution time of the at least one of the tasks;

a tenth unit configured to clear a count value representing the number of the interrupts; and

an eleventh unit configured to activate the timer every second predetermined period to count.

19. A system according to claim 11, wherein the generating unit includes a free run counter and is configured to generate an interrupt to the processing unit every predetermined period using the free run counter and at least one of:

overflow interrupt based on overflow of the free run counter;

a compare register and compare match interrupt based on a count value of the free run counter and a setting value stored in the compare register; and

a periodic register and pulse width modulation periodic interrupt executed every time the count value of the free run counter reaches a pulse width modulation period set to the periodic register upon execution of duty control by the free run counter.

20. A system according to claim 11, wherein the program includes at least one of:

an initialization program to be executed at power-up of the processing unit; and

an off-task program that causes the processing unit to execute various tasks required at power-off of the processing unit.