Visualization tool

• US 20070016435A1
• Filed: 08/03/2005
• Published: 01/18/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 08/05/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: William Bevington
• Original Assignee: William Bevington
• Inventors: Bevington, William
• Application Number:
  US11/196,091
• Publication Number:
  US 20070016435A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 345/440
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/00 Administration; Management
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 11/206 Drawing of charts or graphs

Abstract

The disclosure concerns a visualization of a result, such as the outcome of an election, in a domain such as the United States, comprising components such as states, in which each state has a “weight” corresponding to its electoral vote, and the results of the election are represented by portraying the states in relative sizes in accordance with their respective electoral votes. Also disclosed are means of varying the form of the visual representation, for testing hypotheses about the results in particular states, and for gauging the effect of issues, including issues on which the candidates in the election take differing positions. The disclosure also addresses the applicability of the same techniques to be the areas of medicine, finance, academia or transportation.

Claims

1. A method for presenting a visualization of a quantitative overall result in a modeled domain, said result having a plurality of possible outcomes, wherein said domain is comprised of components and each component has a subresult, and said subresults may be aggregated to calculate said overall result, each component having a weight in relation to said result, comprising

representing each of said components in visual proportion to its weight, and

representing the outcome of said overall result as a function of said aggregation.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of said components has an initial, unweighted geometrical relation with respect to said domain, and wherein the representation of said component preserves one or more geometric aspects of said initial relation.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said components are represented as segments of a bar shape, each said segment having a width proportionate to the weight of the corresponding component.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said components are represented as upper and lower sets of substantially parallel, generally vertically aligned shapes, each shape emanating upward or downward from the general vicinity of a common baseline area, the size of each shape being in proportion to the weight of the corresponding component, and the upward or downward orientation of each shape being in accordance with whether the corresponding component contributes to said aggregation either for or against the represented outcome.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising providing the viewer of said representation the option to select among the visualizations described in any of claims 2, 3 or 4.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a plurality of factors which may be measured with respect to each component, providing the ability to select one or more of said factors, and in which each subresult is a function of the measurements of the one or more selected factors.

7. The method of claim 6, in which said function of the measurements of the one or more selected factors comprises a correlation of each said factor with a quantity sought to be measured in said overall result.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein a distinguishing visual attribute is applied to those components whose subresults are within a specified range from the dividing point between one outcome or another.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising a facility for the viewer of said visualization to alter selected ones of said subresults and recalculating said overall result based upon said alterations.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein each subresult has a breakdown of constituent subelements, further comprising visually representing within each component plurality of subareas whose sizes are proportionate to a quantification of said subelements.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising presenting a series of said visualizations, each having more subresults represented therein than in the previous visualization.

12. The method of claim 3, wherein said segments are ordered in accordance with a rule selected from the following set of possibilities:

(a) by weight, or (b) collation order of their respective identifiers.

13. The method of claim 4, wherein said shapes are arranged are in accordance with a rule selected from the following set of possibilities:

(a) by weight, or (b) collation order of their respective identifiers.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein said overall result is an election, said domain is the unit for which the election is being held, said components are voting subunits within said unit, said weights are respective weights of the subunits, said subresults are the outcome of the vote in each subunit, and said overall result is the outcome of said election.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said election is a U.S. presidential election, said domain is the United States, said components are states, said weights are electoral votes, said subresults are the outcome of the popular vote in each state, and said outcome is the winner of said election.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein said visualization is presented in accordance with claim 2, and said states are visually represented as each having a shape similar to the shape it possesses in said initial, unweighted visual representation, while preserving the approximate overall arrangement of said states and keeping said states substantially contiguous in said arrangement, such the visual representation of the United States, while distorted by said weighting, remains recognizable.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein said overall result is the accumulated number of delegates in the U.S. presidential primaries, each component is a state, said weights are number of delegates for the state, and subresults are the candidate tallies for the state.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein each state is represented as a pie chart whose sectors represent the delegate breakdown for the state among candidates in accordance with said state'"'"'s primary.