Intelligent multimedia user interfaces for intelligence analysis

• US 20070016540A1
• Filed: 07/01/2005
• Published: 01/18/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 07/01/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Sun, Xiaohua, Zhou, Michelle
• Application Number:
  US11/171,388
• Publication Number:
  US 20070016540A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/12
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/045 Explanation of inference; Explainable artificial intelligence [XAI]; Interpretable artificial intelligence

Abstract

Multimedia user interfaces provide an intelligent interaction paradigm that helps analysts to better formulate, validate and manage analyses hypotheses. Spatial-temporal metaphors are proposed to organize and present requested information, and all the information are gradually accumulated based on analysis flow. The analysis flow and the information flow are tightly coupled together, so that at any given point in the analysis process, the analysts are able to link a hypothesis to the relevant information shown in the information space. The analysts can also relate the information presented to a particular hypothesis and its state.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method supporting competitive intelligent analyses of information, comprising the steps of:

generating a display of a hypothesis and simultaneously generating a display of information space that helps to evaluate the hypothesis for interaction by a user;

receiving user actions in the hypothesis space and linking a hypothesis to relevant information in the information space; and

receiving user actions in the information space and linking information displayed in the information space to a particular hypothesis and its state.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the analysis flow and the information flow are tightly coupled so that at any given point of the analysis process, the user is able to link a hypothesis to the relevant information in the information space.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the analysis flow and the information flow are tightly coupled so that at any given point of the analysis process, the user is able to link a piece of information in the information space to a hypothesis in the hypothesis space.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein user actions in the hypothesis space permit manipulations of overall analysis flow.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein user actions in the information space permit an examination of details of the analysis.

6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of linking the hypothesis space and the information space to facilitate question formulation and answer comprehension in context.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of dynamically providing worksheets that helps to direct a human analyst to investigate a hypothesis along desired dimensions.

8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of checking a status of hypotheses in order to automatically remind a human analyst to investigate all possible hypotheses, thereby facilitating a competitive analysis process.

9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of automatically accumulating supporting and refuting evidence for a hypothesis by aggregating a status of the hypothesis marked by an analyst.

10. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of displaying an accumulated evidence matrix that indicates refuting and supporting evidences for every hypothesis that has been explored so far by aggregating a status of the hypothesis marked by an analyst.

11. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step responding to an input by a human analyst to interactively mark a status of a hypothesis by linking the hypothesis to a piece of relevant evidence as either supporting or refuting the hypothesis.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein interaction with a human analyst is by using a question-answer format to gather evidence from online data sources to help validate a hypothesis.

13. The method according to claim 5, wherein human analysts are allowed to directly view all information collected about a person during the analysis process.

14. The method according to claim 5, wherein human analysts are allowed to directly view all information collected about the particular point of time during the analysis process.

15. The method according to claim 5, wherein all retrieved documents about one person are automatically organized and grouped.

16. A computer system supporting competitive intelligent analyses of information, comprising:

a computer display generating a display of a hypothesis and simultaneously generating a display of information space that helps to evaluate the hypothesis for interaction by a user; and

a user interface receiving user actions in the hypothesis space and linking a hypothesis to relevant information in the information space and receiving user actions in the information space and linking information displayed in the information space to a particular hypothesis and its state.

17. The computer system according to claim 16, including a processor wherein the analysis flow and the information flow are tightly coupled so that at any given point of the analysis process, the user is able to link a hypothesis to the relevant information in the information space and link a piece of information in the information space to one or more hypotheses in the hypothesis space.

18. The computer system according to claim 16, wherein the processor links the hypothesis space and the information space to facilitate question formulation and answer comprehension in context.

19. The computer system according to claim 16, further including a database of worksheets that help to direct a human analyst to investigate a hypothesis along desired dimensions, said processor dynamically providing a worksheet to a user of the system.

20. The computer system according to claim 16, further including a display of evidence matrix that presents a human analyst with the correlations of various evidences and all hypotheses that have been explored.

21. The computer system according to claim 16, wherein the processor automatically accumulating supporting and refuting evidence for a hypothesis by aggregating a status of the hypothesis marked by an analyst.

22. The computer system according to claim 16, wherein human analysts are allowed to directly view all information collected about a person on said computer display during the analysis process.

23. The computer system according to claim 16, wherein human analysts are allowed to directly view all information collected about the particular point of time on said computer display during the analysis process.

24. The computer system according to claim 16, wherein all retrieved documents about one person are automatically organized and grouped for viewing on said computer display.

25. A computer readable medium having computer code for implementing a method of supporting competitive intelligent analyses of information, the method comprising the steps of:

generating a display of a hypothesis and simultaneously generating a display of information space that helps to evaluate the hypothesis for interaction by a user;

receiving user actions in the hypothesis space and linking a hypothesis to relevant information in the information space; and

receiving user actions in the information space and linking information displayed in the information space to a particular hypothesis and its state.