System and method for enhancing cost performance of mechanical systems

• US 20070050310A1
• Filed: 07/06/2005
• Published: 03/01/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 01/13/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Standard Aero Limited (StandardAero Business Aviation Services LLC)
• Original Assignee: Standard Aero Limited (StandardAero Business Aviation Services LLC)
• Inventors: Wingenter, Ronald
• Application Number:
  US11/175,533
• Publication Number:
  US 20070050310A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/400
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0283 Price estimation or determination

Abstract

This disclosure is directed to a method to enhance cost performance of a mechanical system. The method includes inspecting the mechanical system to determine a primary work scope. The primary work scope is associated with a first subset of the set of modules. The method further includes accessing a computational system configured to determine an enhanced work scope associated with the first subset and a second subset of modules. The enhanced work scope is determined based on expected cost per unit operation time of the mechanical system. The method also includes performing tasks associated with the enhanced work scope on the mechanical system.

Claims

1. A method for enhancing cost performance of a mechanical system, the method comprising:

receiving a primary work scope, the primary work scope comprising a set of tasks associated with maintenance of the mechanical system;

determining an enhanced work scope, the enhanced work scope including the primary work scope and at least one additional task associated with maintenance of the mechanical system, the enhanced work scope configured to enhance a cost performance parameter; and

providing the enhanced work scope.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules, the method further comprising receiving module data associated with individual modules of the set of modules.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cost performance parameter is cost per unit operation time.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the enhanced work scope comprises determining an estimated maintenance free operation time based on the enhanced work scope.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining the enhanced work scope further comprises determining an estimated cost based on the enhanced work scope.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein determining the estimated operation time and determining the estimated costs are performed iteratively for possible work scopes and wherein one of the possible work scopes is selected as the enhanced work scope based on performance criteria.

4-6. -6. (canceled)

10. A method for enhancing cost performance of a mechanical system, the method comprising:

receiving a primary work scope associated with maintenance of the mechanical system; and

determining an enhanced work scope by iteratively;

determining a secondary work scope associated with maintenance of the mechanical system and based on the primary work scope;

determining an expected operation time of the mechanical system based on the secondary work scope; and

determining an expected cost per operation time based on the secondary work scope and the expected operation time; and

providing the enhanced work scope.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the enhanced work scope includes the secondary work scope when the secondary work scope meets cost performance criteria.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the cost performance criteria includes cost per unit operation time and wherein the performance criteria includes selecting the secondary work scope having the lowest cost per unit operation time.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the performance criteria includes selecting the secondary work scope when the expected operation time is above a particular operation time.

14. The method of claim 10, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules and wherein determining the expected operation time of the mechanical system includes determining the expected operation time based on expected performance of each module of the set of modules.

15. The method of claim 10, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules and wherein determining the expected cost per operation time includes determining sunshine costs based on a subset of the set of modules.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the subset of the set of modules is associated with the primary work scope.

17. The method of claim 10, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules and wherein determining the expected cost per operation time includes determining risk cost associated with a module of the set of modules.

18. The method of claim 10, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules and wherein determining the expected cost per operation time includes determining module use cost associated with a module of the set of modules.

19. The method of claim 10, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules and wherein determining the expected cost per operation time includes determining residual module value associated with a module of the set of modules.

20-21. -21. (canceled)

22. A computational system comprising:

a processor; and

memory accessible to the processor, the memory comprising;

a reliability model;

a cost model; and

a work scope engine operable by the processor to determine an enhanced work scope associated with maintenance of a mechanical system, the enhanced work scope selected from a set of work scopes based on expected performance criteria, the work scope engine configured to access the reliability model to determine an expected operational time based on a selected work scope of the set of work scopes and configured to access the cost model to determine a cost per unit operation based on the selected work scope, the work scope engine configured to determine the expected performance criteria from the expected operational time and the cost per unit operation.

23. The computational system of claim 22, wherein the mechanical system includes a set of modules.

24. The computational system of claim 23, wherein the reliability model includes individual reliability models for each module of the set of modules.

25. The computational system of claim 23, wherein the cost model is configured to estimate sunshine costs.

26. The computational system of claim 25, wherein the memory includes a primary work scope and engine module data and wherein the sunshine costs are a function of the primary work scope.

27-33. -33. (canceled)