Apparatus, system and method capable of cooperating in a distributed communication wireless network

• US 20070053338A1
• Filed: 09/02/2005
• Published: 03/08/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/02/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Original Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Inventors: Sandhu, Sumeet, Yarvis, Mark, Lin, Xintian, Mulgaonkar, Prasanna
• Application Number:
  US11/218,676
• Publication Number:
  US 20070053338A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 370/349
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 40/10 based on available power or energy
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 88/04 adapted for relaying to or from another terminal or user
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 30/70 in wireless communication networks

Abstract

An embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus, comprising a node capable of cooperating in a distributed communication wireless network and wherein the cooperation is based upon predetermined fairness criteria. In an embodiment of the present invention the predetermined fairness criteria may include algorithms that account for battery life and quality of service (QoS). The wireless network may be a centralized network or de-centralized network.

Claims

1. An apparatus, comprising:

a node capable of cooperating in a distributed communication wireless network; and

wherein said cooperation is based upon predetermined fairness criteria.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said predetermined fairness criteria includes algorithms that account for battery life and quality of service (QoS).

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said wireless network is a centralized network.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein when said node receives a packet for relaying, it first checks whether its own data needs are met and if said node doesn'"'"'t have outstanding packets, it then checks its processing costs and determines if said node will then transmits a relay packet.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said node is capable of receiving a header on a relay packet and determining whether or not to receive a full packet or not.

6. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein said data needs are measured by the length of the application layer packet queue.

7. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein processing costs are measured by a remaining battery power.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said wireless network is a de-centralized networks.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein said nodes are rewarded for spending battery power to assist other nodes.

10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein said rewarding is accomplished by incentive based billing methods to accounts associated with said node.

11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein said incentive based billing methods is performed by one or more of the following methods:

a tiered service plan wherein nodes in said network cooperate with others but do not request cooperation will pay a lowest basic rate;

nodes in said network that do not request cooperation and do not cooperate will be charged a medium rate higher a basic rate;

nodes in said network that cooperate and request cooperation will be charged a medium rate; and

nodes in said network that request cooperation but do not cooperate will be charged a highest premium rate.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said method is enforced by a vendor or service provider of said network by means of a software switch or activation code.

13. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the cooperation by said node in said network is encouraged by usage based incentives, wherein nodes that relay the most packets for other nodes receive compensation at the end of a billing period and is implemented by having a final destination gateway keep track of all relaying addresses when it eventually receives the packet.

14. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the cooperation by said node in said network is encouraged by Usage based points/credits wherein nodes that relay packets for other nodes receive credit points per packet by a local wireless gateway keeping track of packets relayed by each node.

15. A method of node cooperation in a distributed communication wireless network, comprising:

basing cooperation by nodes in said distributed communication wireless network upon predetermined fairness criteria.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising accounting for battery life and quality of service (QoS) in said predetermined fairness criteria.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein said wireless network is a centralized networks.

18. The method of claim 15, further comprising checking first whether its own data needs are met and if said node doesn'"'"'t have outstanding packets, and when said node receives a packet for relaying, checking its processing costs and determining if said node will then transmit a relay packet.

19. The method of claim 15, further comprising receiving a header on a relay packet and determining whether or not to receive a full packet or not.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein said wireless network is a de-centralized networks.

21. The method of claim 15, further comprising rewarding said nodes for spending battery power to assist other nodes.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising using incentive based billing methods to accounts associated with said node.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein said incentive based billing methods is performed by one or more of the following methods:

a tiered service plan wherein nodes in said network cooperate with others but do not request cooperation will pay a lowest basic rate;

nodes in said network that do not request cooperation and do not cooperate will be charged a medium rate higher a basic rate;

nodes in said network that cooperate and request cooperation will be charged a medium rate; and

nodes in said network that request cooperation but do not cooperate will be charged a highest premium rate.

24. The method of claim 15, further comprising encouraging the cooperation by said node in said network by Usage based points/credits wherein nodes that relay packets for other nodes receive credit points per packet by a local wireless gateway keeping track of packets relayed by each node.

25. A system, comprising:

a plurality of nodes capable of cooperating in a distributed communication wireless network, wherein said cooperation is based upon predetermined fairness criteria.

26. The system of claim 25, wherein said predetermined fairness criteria includes algorithms that account for battery life and quality of service (QoS).

27. The system of claim 25, wherein said wireless network is a centralized network.

28. The system of claim 25, wherein said wireless network is a de-centralized network.